School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology and Liver Unit, Gastroenterology Area, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Gemelli, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Jan;47(1):26-42. doi: 10.1111/apt.14384. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
The concept of an altered collective gut microbiota rather than identification of a single culprit is possibly the most significant development in inflammatory bowel disease research. We have entered the "omics" era, which now allows us to undertake large-scale/high-throughput microbiota analysis which may well define how we approach diagnosis and treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in the future, with a strong steer towards personalised therapeutics.
To assess current epidemiological, experimental and clinical evidence of the current status of knowledge relating to the gut microbiome, and its role in IBD, with emphasis on reviewing the evidence relating to microbial therapeutics and future microbiome modulating therapeutics.
A Medline search including items 'intestinal microbiota/microbiome', 'inflammatory bowel disease', 'ulcerative colitis', 'Crohn's disease', 'faecal microbial transplantation', 'dietary manipulation' was performed.
Disease remission and relapse are associated with microbial changes in both mucosal and luminal samples. In particular, a loss of species richness in Crohn's disease has been widely observed. Existing therapeutic approaches broadly fall into 3 categories, namely: accession, reduction or indirect modulation of the microbiome. In terms of microbial therapeutics, faecal microbial transplantation appears to hold the most promise; however, differences in study design/methodology mean it is currently challenging to elegantly translate results into clinical practice.
Existing approaches to modulate the gut microbiome are relatively unrefined. Looking forward, the future of microbiome-modulating therapeutics looks bright with several novel strategies/technologies on the horizon. Taken collectively, it is clear that ignoring the microbiome in IBD is not an option.
改变的集体肠道微生物群落的概念,而不是确定单一的罪魁祸首,这可能是炎症性肠病研究中最重要的进展。我们已经进入了“组学”时代,现在可以进行大规模/高通量的微生物组分析,这很可能定义我们未来如何诊断和治疗炎症性肠病(IBD),并朝着个性化治疗方向发展。
评估与肠道微生物群及其在 IBD 中的作用相关的当前知识的现状的当前流行病学、实验和临床证据,重点是回顾与微生物治疗和未来微生物群调节治疗相关的证据。
进行了 Medline 搜索,包括项目“肠道微生物群/微生物组”、“炎症性肠病”、“溃疡性结肠炎”、“克罗恩病”、“粪便微生物移植”、“饮食干预”。
疾病缓解和复发与黏膜和腔样本中的微生物变化有关。特别是,在克罗恩病中广泛观察到物种丰富度的丧失。现有的治疗方法大致可分为 3 类,即:微生物群的获得、减少或间接调节。就微生物治疗而言,粪便微生物移植似乎最有希望;然而,由于研究设计/方法的差异,目前将结果巧妙地转化为临床实践具有挑战性。
调节肠道微生物群的现有方法相对不成熟。展望未来,随着几种新策略/技术的出现,微生物群调节治疗的未来前景一片光明。总的来说,在 IBD 中忽略微生物群是不可能的。