• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于人类威胁条件作用研究的贝叶斯假设检验:介绍与condir R包

Bayesian hypothesis testing for human threat conditioning research: an introduction and the condir R package.

作者信息

Krypotos Angelos-Miltiadis, Klugkist Irene, Engelhard Iris M

机构信息

Department of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Department of Methodology and Statistics, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2017 May 16;8(sup1):1314782. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2017.1314782. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1080/20008198.2017.1314782
PMID:29038683
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5632775/
Abstract

Threat conditioning procedures have allowed the experimental investigation of the pathogenesis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. The findings of these procedures have also provided stable foundations for the development of relevant intervention programs (e.g. exposure therapy). Statistical inference of threat conditioning procedures is commonly based on -values and Null Hypothesis Significance Testing (NHST). Nowadays, however, there is a growing concern about this statistical approach, as many scientists point to the various limitations of -values and NHST. As an alternative, the use of Bayes factors and Bayesian hypothesis testing has been suggested. In this article, we apply this statistical approach to threat conditioning data. In order to enable the easy computation of Bayes factors for threat conditioning data we present a new R package named condir, which can be used either via the R console or via a Shiny application. This article provides both a non-technical introduction to Bayesian analysis for researchers using the threat conditioning paradigm, and the necessary tools for computing Bayes factors easily.

摘要

威胁条件作用程序使得对创伤后应激障碍发病机制的实验研究成为可能。这些程序的研究结果也为相关干预项目(如暴露疗法)的发展提供了坚实的基础。威胁条件作用程序的统计推断通常基于p值和零假设显著性检验(NHST)。然而,如今人们对这种统计方法的担忧日益增加,因为许多科学家指出了p值和NHST的各种局限性。作为一种替代方法,有人建议使用贝叶斯因子和贝叶斯假设检验。在本文中,我们将这种统计方法应用于威胁条件作用数据。为了能够轻松计算威胁条件作用数据的贝叶斯因子,我们提出了一个名为condir的新R包,它既可以通过R控制台使用,也可以通过一个Shiny应用程序使用。本文既为使用威胁条件作用范式的研究人员提供了贝叶斯分析的非技术性介绍,也提供了轻松计算贝叶斯因子的必要工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b48/5632775/e4f6773551fb/ZEPT_A_1314782_F0004_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b48/5632775/8641633ff41d/ZEPT_A_1314782_F0001_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b48/5632775/7febc394ed46/ZEPT_A_1314782_F0002_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b48/5632775/e62fe32988ec/ZEPT_A_1314782_F0003_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b48/5632775/e4f6773551fb/ZEPT_A_1314782_F0004_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b48/5632775/8641633ff41d/ZEPT_A_1314782_F0001_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b48/5632775/7febc394ed46/ZEPT_A_1314782_F0002_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b48/5632775/e62fe32988ec/ZEPT_A_1314782_F0003_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b48/5632775/e4f6773551fb/ZEPT_A_1314782_F0004_C.jpg

相似文献

1
Bayesian hypothesis testing for human threat conditioning research: an introduction and the condir R package.用于人类威胁条件作用研究的贝叶斯假设检验:介绍与condir R包
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2017 May 16;8(sup1):1314782. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2017.1314782. eCollection 2017.
2
Bayesian alternatives to null hypothesis significance testing in biomedical research: a non-technical introduction to Bayesian inference with JASP.贝叶斯替代零假设检验在生物医学研究中的应用:使用 JASP 进行贝叶斯推理的非技术性介绍
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Jun 5;20(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-00980-6.
3
Bayesian alternatives for common null-hypothesis significance tests in psychiatry: a non-technical guide using JASP.精神医学中常见的虚无假设显著性检验的贝叶斯替代方法:使用 JASP 的非技术性指南。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Jun 7;18(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1761-4.
4
fbst: An R package for the Full Bayesian Significance Test for testing a sharp null hypothesis against its alternative via the e value.fbst:一个 R 包,用于全贝叶斯显著性检验,通过 e 值对尖锐零假设与其备择假设进行检验。
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Jun;54(3):1114-1130. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01613-6. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
5
An Introduction to Calculating Bayes Factors in JASP for Speech, Language, and Hearing Research.JASP 中用于言语、语言和听觉研究的贝叶斯因子计算简介。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 Dec 10;62(12):4523-4533. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-H-19-0183. Print 2019 Dec 18.
6
Bayesian inference of population prevalence.贝叶斯推断种群流行率。
Elife. 2021 Oct 6;10:e62461. doi: 10.7554/eLife.62461.
7
Bayesian analysis for nurse and midwifery research: statistical, practical and ethical benefits.护士与助产研究中的贝叶斯分析:统计、实践及伦理方面的益处
Nurse Res. 2023 Jan 19. doi: 10.7748/nr.2023.e1852.
8
A Simple Method for Teaching Bayesian Hypothesis Testing in the Brain and Behavioral Sciences.一种在脑科学与行为科学中教授贝叶斯假设检验的简单方法。
J Undergrad Neurosci Educ. 2018 Jun 15;16(2):A126-A130. eCollection 2018 Spring.
9
A review of issues about null hypothesis Bayesian testing.对零假设贝叶斯检验相关问题的综述。
Psychol Methods. 2019 Dec;24(6):774-795. doi: 10.1037/met0000221. Epub 2019 May 16.
10
Complementing the P-value from null-hypothesis significance testing with a Bayes factor from null-hypothesis Bayesian testing.用零假设贝叶斯检验的贝叶斯因子对零假设显著性检验的P值进行补充。
Nurse Res. 2020 Nov 4. doi: 10.7748/nr.2020.e1756.

引用本文的文献

1
Methodological implications of sample size and extinction gradient on the robustness of fear conditioning across different analytic strategies.样本量和灭绝梯度对不同分析策略下恐惧条件反射稳健性的方法学意义。
PLoS One. 2022 May 24;17(5):e0268814. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268814. eCollection 2022.
2
Systematic search of Bayesian statistics in the field of psychotraumatology.对心理创伤学领域贝叶斯统计学的系统检索。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2017 Oct 31;8(sup1):1375339. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2017.1375339. eCollection 2017.
3
Modification of episodic memories by novel learning: a failed replication study.

本文引用的文献

1
A Primer on Bayesian Analysis for Experimental Psychopathologists.实验心理病理学家的贝叶斯分析入门
J Exp Psychopathol. 2017;8(2):140-157. doi: 10.5127/jep.057316.
2
The Bayesian New Statistics: Hypothesis testing, estimation, meta-analysis, and power analysis from a Bayesian perspective.贝叶斯新统计:从贝叶斯视角看假设检验、估计、元分析和功效分析。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Feb;25(1):178-206. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1221-4.
3
Default Bayes Factors for Model Selection in Regression.回归模型选择中的默认贝叶斯因子
通过新学习对情景记忆的修改:一项失败的重复研究。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2017 May 16;8(sup1):1315291. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2017.1315291. eCollection 2017.
Multivariate Behav Res. 2012 Nov;47(6):877-903. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2012.734737.
4
Sequential hypothesis testing with Bayes factors: Efficiently testing mean differences.贝叶斯因子的序贯假设检验:高效检验均值差异。
Psychol Methods. 2017 Jun;22(2):322-339. doi: 10.1037/met0000061. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
5
Effects of Approach-Avoidance Training on the Extinction and Return of Fear Responses.趋避训练对恐惧反应消退及重现的影响。
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 22;10(7):e0131581. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131581. eCollection 2015.
6
Bayesian Assessment of Null Values Via Parameter Estimation and Model Comparison.贝叶斯方法通过参数估计和模型比较来评估缺失值。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011 May;6(3):299-312. doi: 10.1177/1745691611406925.
7
Statistical Evidence in Experimental Psychology: An Empirical Comparison Using 855 t Tests.实验心理学中的统计证据:使用 855 个 t 检验的实证比较。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011 May;6(3):291-8. doi: 10.1177/1745691611406923.
8
Bayesian Versus Orthodox Statistics: Which Side Are You On?贝叶斯统计与经典统计:你站在哪一边?
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011 May;6(3):274-90. doi: 10.1177/1745691611406920.
9
Analyzing small data sets using Bayesian estimation: the case of posttraumatic stress symptoms following mechanical ventilation in burn survivors.使用贝叶斯估计分析小数据集:烧伤幸存者机械通气后创伤后应激症状的案例。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2015 Mar 11;6:25216. doi: 10.3402/ejpt.v6.25216. eCollection 2015.
10
Updated meta-analysis of classical fear conditioning in the anxiety disorders.焦虑症中经典恐惧条件作用的更新荟萃分析。
Depress Anxiety. 2015 Apr;32(4):239-53. doi: 10.1002/da.22353. Epub 2015 Feb 20.