Suppr超能文献

基于五名健康个体的辐照外周血样本,分析1000毫戈瑞及以下剂量照射后双着丝粒染色体和染色体易位的剂量反应曲线。

Dose-response curves for analyzing of dicentric chromosomes and chromosome translocations following doses of 1000 mGy or less, based on irradiated peripheral blood samples from five healthy individuals.

作者信息

Abe Yu, Yoshida Mitsuaki A, Fujioka Kurumi, Kurosu Yumiko, Ujiie Risa, Yanagi Aki, Tsuyama Naohiro, Miura Tomisato, Inaba Toshiya, Kamiya Kenji, Sakai Akira

机构信息

Department of Radiation Life Sciences, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, 1 Hikarigaoka, Fukushima, 960-1295, Japan.

Department of Radiation Biology, Institute of Radiation Emergency Medicine, Hirosaki University, Hirosaki, 036-8564, Japan.

出版信息

J Radiat Res. 2018 Jan 1;59(1):35-42. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrx052.

Abstract

In terms of biological dosimetry at the time of radiation exposure, the dicentric chromosome (Dic) assay (DCA) is the gold standard for assessing for the acute phase and chromosome translocation (Tr) analysis is the gold standard for assessing the chronic phase. It is desirable to have individual dose-response curves (DRCs) for each laboratory because the analysis criteria differ between laboratories. We constructed the DRCs for radiation dose estimation (with three methods) using peripheral blood (PB) samples from five healthy individuals. Aliquots were irradiated with one of eight gamma-ray doses (0, 10, 20, 50, 100, 200, 500 or 1000 mGy), then cultured for 48 h. The number of chromosome aberrations (CAs) was analyzed by DCA, using Giemsa staining and centromere-fluorescence in situ hybridization (centromere-FISH) and by chromosome painting (chromosome pairs 1, 2 and 4) for Tr analysis. In DCA, there was large variation between individuals in the frequency of Dics formed, and the slopes of the DRCs were different. In Tr analysis, although variation was observed in the frequency of Tr, the slopes of the DRCs were similar after adjusting the background for age. Good correlation between the irradiation dose and the frequency of CAs formed was observed with these three DRCs. However, performing three different biological dosimetry assays simultaneously on PB from five donors nonetheless results in variation in the frequency of CAs formed, especially at doses of 50 mGy or less, highlighting the difficulty of biological dosimetry using these methods. We conclude that it might be difficult to construct universal DRCs.

摘要

在辐射暴露时的生物剂量测定方面,双着丝粒染色体(Dic)分析(DCA)是评估急性期的金标准,染色体易位(Tr)分析是评估慢性期的金标准。由于各实验室的分析标准不同,因此每个实验室都需要有各自的个体剂量反应曲线(DRC)。我们使用来自五名健康个体的外周血(PB)样本,构建了用于辐射剂量估计的DRC(采用三种方法)。将等分试样用八种γ射线剂量(0、10、20、50、100、200、500或1000 mGy)之一进行照射,然后培养48小时。通过DCA分析染色体畸变(CA)的数量,采用吉姆萨染色和着丝粒荧光原位杂交(着丝粒-FISH),并通过染色体涂染(第1、2和4号染色体对)进行Tr分析。在DCA中,形成的双着丝粒染色体频率在个体之间存在很大差异,DRC的斜率也不同。在Tr分析中,虽然观察到易位频率存在差异,但在根据年龄调整背景后,DRC的斜率相似。用这三种DRC观察到照射剂量与形成的CA频率之间具有良好的相关性。然而,同时对来自五个供体的PB进行三种不同的生物剂量测定分析,仍然会导致形成的CA频率出现差异,尤其是在50 mGy或更低剂量时,这突出了使用这些方法进行生物剂量测定的困难。我们得出结论,构建通用的DRC可能很困难。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3865/5786284/000c2b38be17/rrx052f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验