Klumpp Heide, Bhaumik Runa, Kinney Kerry L, Fitzgerald Jacklynn M
Department of Psychiatry (HK, RB), University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States; Department of Psychology (HK, KLK), University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
Department of Psychiatry (HK, RB), University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
Behav Brain Res. 2018 Feb 15;338:128-133. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2017.10.024. Epub 2017 Oct 20.
Reappraisal, a cognitive approach intended to alter an emotional response, is generally associated with prefrontal cortical recruitment and decreased limbic activity. However, the extent to which neurofunctional activity predicts successful reappraisal is unclear. During fMRI, 60 healthy participants completed a reappraisal paradigm, which included reappraising negative images to reduce emotional reactivity ('ReappNeg') and viewing negative images and experiencing the negative affect they evoke ('LookNeg'). After each trial, participants rated their emotional response on a Likert-type scale where higher values indicated more negative affect. Reappraisal ability was based on a difference value (ΔReappNeg-LookNeg) such that negative values signified successful reappraisal ('SR'; n=38) and positive values, unsuccessful reappraisal ('USR'; n=22). Neural activity based on ReappNeg-LookNeg conditions from 37 regions of interest encompassing cortical and limbic areas was submitted to Principal Component Analysis (PCA). Resulting PCA factors were submitted to discriminant function analysis to evaluate which factor(s) predicted SR and USR groups. Results showed a factor with high loadings for certain frontal areas (e.g., left dorsomedial prefrontal cortex) and limbic regions (e.g., bilateral amygdala) predicted 71.1% of cases in the SR group and 68.2% of cases in the USR group. Additionally, successful reappraisal corresponded with more activation in the factor with high loadings for frontal areas and less activity in the factor associated with limbic regions. Results are consistent with studies of individual differences where more prefrontal engagement and less limbic activity is associated with effectual reappraisal, but for the first time, a neural 'signature' for successful reappraisal has been demonstrated.
重新评价是一种旨在改变情绪反应的认知方法,通常与前额叶皮质的激活和边缘系统活动的减少有关。然而,神经功能活动预测成功重新评价的程度尚不清楚。在功能磁共振成像(fMRI)期间,60名健康参与者完成了一个重新评价范式,其中包括重新评价负面图像以降低情绪反应性(“重新评价负面图像”)以及观看负面图像并体验它们所引发的负面影响(“观看负面图像”)。每次试验后,参与者用李克特量表对他们的情绪反应进行评分,分数越高表明负面影响越大。重新评价能力基于一个差值(重新评价负面图像-观看负面图像),负值表示成功重新评价(“SR”;n = 38),正值表示重新评价失败(“USR”;n = 22)。基于包括皮质和边缘区域在内的37个感兴趣区域的重新评价负面图像-观看负面图像条件的神经活动被提交到主成分分析(PCA)。将得到的主成分分析因子提交到判别函数分析,以评估哪些因子能够预测SR组和USR组。结果显示,在某些额叶区域(如左背内侧前额叶皮质)和边缘区域(如双侧杏仁核)具有高负荷的一个因子预测了SR组71.1%的情况和USR组68.2%的情况。此外,成功的重新评价与额叶区域高负荷因子中更多的激活以及与边缘区域相关因子中更少的活动相对应。这些结果与个体差异研究一致,即更多的前额叶参与和更少的边缘系统活动与有效的重新评价相关,但首次证明了成功重新评价的神经“特征"。