University of Illinois at Chicago, Department of Psychology, Chicago, IL, USA; University of Illinois at Chicago, Department of Psychiatry, Chicago, IL, USA.
University of Illinois at Chicago, Department of Psychology, Chicago, IL, USA; University of Illinois at Chicago, Department of Psychiatry, Chicago, IL, USA; University of Illinois at Chicago, Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology and The Graduate Program in Neuroscience, Chicago, IL, USA; Jesse Brown VA Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Neuropsychologia. 2020 Aug;145:106675. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.02.002. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
Neuroimaging research has characterized underlying neural mechanisms of attentional control and cognitive reappraisal, common implicit and explicit forms of emotion regulation, respectively. This research suggests attentional control and reappraisal may engage similar midline and lateral areas in the prefrontal cortex (PFC); however, findings are largely based on separate studies. Therefore, the extent to which mechanisms of implicit versus explicit regulation are independent or overlapping is not clear. In the current study, 49 healthy participants completed well-validated implicit and explicit regulation tasks in the form of attentional control and cognitive reappraisal during functional magnetic resonance imaging. During implicit regulation, participants identified a target letter in a string of letters superimposed on threatening faces. To manipulate attentional control, the letter string either consisted of all targets ('Threat Low' perceptual load), or was embedded among non-target letters ('Threat High' perceptual load). During cognitive reappraisal, participants were shown aversive images and instructed to use a cognitive approach to down-regulate negative affect ('Reappraise') or to naturally experience emotions without altering them ('Look-Negative'). Order of administration of tasks was counterbalanced across participants. Whole-brain results regarding frontal activity showed ventromedial PFC/rostral anterior cingulate cortex was recruited during Threat Low > Threat High. In contrast, Reappraise > Look-Negative resulted in engagement of the dorsolateral PFC, ventrolateral PFC and dorsomedial PFC. In addition, results showed no relationship between accuracy during attentional control and self-reported negative affect during cognitive reappraisal. Results indicate attentional control in the context of threat distractors and the reappraisal of negative images are supported by discrete, non-overlapping neurocircuitries.
神经影像学研究分别对注意力控制和认知重评这两种情绪调节的常见内隐和外显形式的潜在神经机制进行了描述。这些研究表明,注意力控制和重评可能涉及前额叶皮层(PFC)中的中线和外侧区域;然而,这些发现主要基于单独的研究。因此,内隐和外显调节机制是独立还是重叠尚不清楚。在目前的研究中,49 名健康参与者在功能磁共振成像期间完成了注意力控制和认知重评这两种经过充分验证的内隐和外显调节任务。在内隐调节中,参与者在叠加有威胁面孔的字符串中识别目标字母。为了操纵注意力控制,字母串要么只包含所有目标(“威胁低”知觉负荷),要么嵌入在非目标字母中(“威胁高”知觉负荷)。在认知重评中,参与者观看了令人厌恶的图像,并被指示使用认知方法来降低负面情绪(“重评”)或自然地体验情绪而不改变它们(“看负面”)。任务的实施顺序在参与者之间是平衡的。关于额叶活动的全脑结果显示,腹内侧前额叶皮层/额前扣带皮层在威胁低>威胁高时被激活。相比之下,重评>看负面导致背外侧前额叶皮层、腹外侧前额叶皮层和背内侧前额叶皮层的参与。此外,结果表明,在注意力控制过程中的准确性与认知重评过程中自我报告的负面情绪之间没有关系。结果表明,在威胁分心物的背景下进行注意力控制和对负面图像进行重评,是由离散的、不重叠的神经回路支持的。