Department of Sociology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Boston University School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, USA.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2018 Jan;72(1):54-60. doi: 10.1136/jech-2017-209350. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
Alcohol control policy has a fundamental role in limiting negative health, economic and social harm caused by alcohol consumption. However, there is substantial international heterogeneity in country-level policy adoption, implementation and monitoring. Comparative measures so far focused on Europe or the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries.
We created an Alcohol Control Policy Index (ACPI) for 167 countries using five different methodological approaches. National policies were sourced from WHO's Global Information System on Alcohol and Health. We assessed ACPI's criterion-related validity by calculating the strength of the association among the different approaches. As for content validity, we tested whether the resulting scores explained variations in alcohol per capita consumption cross-nationally, controlling for gross domestic product, population age, urbanisation and world region using OLS and random coefficients models.
Index scores and ranks from different methodological approaches are highly correlated (r=0.99). Higher scores were associated with lower consumption across the five methods. For each 1 score increase in the ACPI, the reduction in per capita alcohol consumption varies from -0.024 L (95% CI (-0.043 to -0.004) to -0.014 L (95% CI (-0.034 to 0.005). We obtain larger coefficients and p values <0.005 when estimating random coefficients.
ACPI offers a measure of alcohol control policy across countries that makes use of a larger number of countries than its predecessors, as well as a wider range of methodologies for its calculation, both of which contribute to its validity. Furthermore, it shows that the statutory strictness of alcohol control policies is associated with lower levels of alcohol consumption.
酒精控制政策在限制因饮酒而产生的负面健康、经济和社会危害方面发挥着根本性作用。然而,在国家一级的政策采用、实施和监测方面,存在着大量的国际差异。迄今为止,比较措施主要集中在欧洲或经济合作与发展组织国家。
我们使用五种不同的方法为 167 个国家创建了酒精控制政策指数(ACPI)。国家政策来自世卫组织全球酒精和健康信息系统。我们通过计算不同方法之间的关联强度来评估 ACPI 的准则相关性有效性。至于内容有效性,我们使用 OLS 和随机系数模型,在控制国内生产总值、人口年龄、城市化和世界区域的情况下,检验了所得分数是否能解释各国人均酒精消费的差异。
不同方法的指数得分和排名高度相关(r=0.99)。较高的分数与五种方法中的较低消费相关。ACPI 每增加 1 分,人均酒精消费量的降幅在 0.024L(95%CI(-0.043 至 -0.004)至 0.014L(95%CI(-0.034 至 0.005)之间变化。当估计随机系数时,我们得到了更大的系数和 p 值<0.005。
ACPI 提供了一种衡量各国酒精控制政策的方法,它使用了比其前身更多的国家,以及更广泛的计算方法,这两者都有助于提高其有效性。此外,它表明,酒精控制政策的法定严格程度与较低的酒精消费水平相关。