• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

性格和人格的衡量标准是否不同?来自观察得分和真实得分分析的证据。

Are Measures of Character and Personality Distinct? Evidence From Observed-Score and True-Score Analyses.

机构信息

Fairleigh Dickinson University, Teaneck, NJ, USA.

Oregon Research Institute, Eugene, OR, USA.

出版信息

Assessment. 2020 Jan;27(1):117-135. doi: 10.1177/1073191117738047. Epub 2017 Oct 26.

DOI:10.1177/1073191117738047
PMID:29073771
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5878981/
Abstract

Two studies were conducted to investigate redundancy between the character strengths found in the VIA model of character and familiar personality facets. Study 1 used a community sample ( = 606) that completed a measure of character strengths, four personality inventories, and 17 criterion measures. The second study used Mechanical Turk workers ( = 498) who completed measures of the HEXACO and VIA models and 111 criterion variables. Analyses were conducted using both observed scores and true score estimates, evaluating both predictive and conceptual overlap. Eight of 24 VIA scales proved to be largely redundant with one HEXACO personality facet, but only one VIA scale (Appreciation of Beauty) was largely redundant with Five Factor facets. All strength scales except Spirituality overlapped substantially with at least one personality facet. The results suggest the VIA Classification variables are strongly related to commonly measured personality facets, but the two models are not redundant.

摘要

两项研究旨在探究 VIA 性格模型中的性格优势与熟悉的人格特质之间是否存在冗余。研究 1 采用了社区样本(n=606),他们完成了性格优势量表、四个人格量表和 17 个效标测量。第二项研究使用 Mechanical Turk 工人(n=498),他们完成了 HEXACO 和 VIA 模型以及 111 个效标变量的测量。分析同时使用了观察得分和真实得分估计,评估了预测和概念上的重叠。24 个 VIA 量表中有 8 个与 HEXACO 的一个人格特质维度高度相关,但只有一个 VIA 量表(美感)与五因素人格特质维度高度相关。除了精神性之外,所有的优势量表都与至少一个人格特质维度有很大的重叠。结果表明,VIA 分类变量与常用的人格特质维度密切相关,但这两个模型并不冗余。

相似文献

1
Are Measures of Character and Personality Distinct? Evidence From Observed-Score and True-Score Analyses.性格和人格的衡量标准是否不同?来自观察得分和真实得分分析的证据。
Assessment. 2020 Jan;27(1):117-135. doi: 10.1177/1073191117738047. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
2
How Well Do Big Five Measures Capture HEXACO Scale Variance?大五人格测量与 HEXACO 量表的差异捕捉能力如何?
J Pers Assess. 2019 Nov-Dec;101(6):567-573. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2018.1448986. Epub 2018 Apr 9.
3
The HEXACO Personality Inventory: Validation and Psychometric Properties in the Serbian Language.《HEXACO 人格量表:塞尔维亚语版的验证与心理测量特性》。
J Pers Assess. 2019 Jan-Feb;101(1):25-31. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2017.1370426. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
4
Cross-Validation of the VIA Inventory of Strengths-Revised and its Short Forms.VIA 优势量表修订版及其简式的交叉验证。
J Pers Assess. 2021 Jan-Feb;103(1):120-131. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2019.1705465. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
5
Temperament, character, and personality disorders.气质、性格与人格障碍。
J Pers Disord. 1998 Winter;12(4):362-72. doi: 10.1521/pedi.1998.12.4.362.
6
Scale- and item-level factor analyses of the VIA inventory of strengths.《价值观与行动(VIA)优势问卷》的量表及条目层面的因素分析
Assessment. 2014 Feb;21(1):4-14. doi: 10.1177/1073191112450612. Epub 2012 Aug 1.
7
Construction and preliminary validation of Triarchic Psychopathy Scales from the HEXACO-100.三因素精神变态量表的编制与初步验证:来自 HEXACO-100 的研究。
Psychol Assess. 2019 Aug;31(8):961-973. doi: 10.1037/pas0000716. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
8
Test-retest reliability of the HEXACO-100-And the value of multiple measurements for assessing reliability.HEXACO-100 的重测信度——以及多次测量评估可靠性的价值。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 13;17(1):e0262465. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262465. eCollection 2022.
9
Relations Between Lexical and Biological Perspectives on Personality: New Evidence Based on HEXACO and Affective Neuroscience Theory.人格的词汇和生物视角之间的关系:基于 HEXACO 和情感神经科学理论的新证据。
J Pers Assess. 2020 May-Jun;102(3):325-336. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2018.1553782. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
10
Comparative validity of brief to medium-length Big Five and Big Six Personality Questionnaires.短至中等长度大五和大六人格问卷的比较有效性。
Psychol Assess. 2011 Dec;23(4):995-1009. doi: 10.1037/a0024165. Epub 2011 Aug 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Differences in personality and character traits of occupational therapy researchers and non-researchers: A cross-sectional study.职业治疗研究人员与非研究人员在人格和性格特征上的差异:一项横断面研究。
Aust Occup Ther J. 2025 Apr;72(2):e70015. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.70015.
2
Exploring peculiarities and performance predictors of character strengths in individual and team sports.探索个人和团队运动中性格优势的特点及表现预测因素。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 7;15(1):11833. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-96230-0.
3
The preschool strengths inventory: development and validation.学前优势量表:编制与验证
Front Psychol. 2025 Feb 12;16:1468944. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1468944. eCollection 2025.
4
Character strength traits, states, and emotional well-being: A daily diary study.性格优势特质、状态与情绪幸福感:一项日记研究
J Pers. 2025 Apr;93(2):341-360. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12933. Epub 2024 Apr 15.
5
Is the concept of personality capacious enough to incorporate virtues?人格的概念是否足够宽泛,能够包含各种美德?
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 29;14:1232637. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1232637. eCollection 2023.
6
Experiences and perception of character strengths among patients with breast cancer in China: a qualitative study.中国乳腺癌患者对性格优势的体验和感知:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Oct 28;12(10):e061994. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061994.
7
Character strengths and fluid intelligence.性格优势与流体智力。
J Pers. 2022 Dec;90(6):1057-1069. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12715. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
8
Good Character at College: The Combined Role of Second-Order Character Strength Factors and Motivation in Undergraduate Academic Outcomes.大学良好品德:二阶品格优势因素与动机对本科生学业成果的综合作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 4;18(16):8263. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168263.
9
Towards an Integrative Taxonomy of Social-Emotional Competences.迈向社会情感能力的综合分类法。
Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 11;12:515313. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.515313. eCollection 2021.
10
Incremental Validity of Character Strengths as Predictors of Job Performance Beyond General Mental Ability and the Big Five.性格优势作为工作绩效预测指标相对于一般智力和大五人格的增量效度。
Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 12;12:518369. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.518369. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Much ado about grit: A meta-analytic synthesis of the grit literature.《坚毅研究文献的元分析综合》
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2017 Sep;113(3):492-511. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000102. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
2
Statistically Controlling for Confounding Constructs Is Harder than You Think.对混杂结构进行统计控制比你想象的要难。
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 31;11(3):e0152719. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152719. eCollection 2016.
3
True grit and genetics: Predicting academic achievement from personality.真正的毅力与基因:从个性预测学业成就。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2016 Nov;111(5):780-789. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000089. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
4
Psychometric Properties of the HEXACO Personality Inventory.HEXACO人格量表的心理测量特性。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2004 Apr 1;39(2):329-58. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_8.
5
Meta-analysis of the changes in correlations between depression instruments used in longitudinal studies.纵向研究中使用的抑郁量表相关性变化的Meta分析。
J Affect Disord. 2016 Jan 15;190:733-743. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.10.054. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
6
Liberals think more analytically (more "WEIRD") than conservatives.自由主义者比保守主义者更善于进行分析性思考(更具“西方、受过良好教育、工业化、富有、民主”的特点)。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2015 Feb;41(2):250-67. doi: 10.1177/0146167214563672. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
7
Isms dimensions: toward a more comprehensive and integrative model of belief-system components.主义维度:构建更全面、更具综合性的信仰系统成分模型。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2013 May;104(5):921-39. doi: 10.1037/a0031968.
8
Scale- and item-level factor analyses of the VIA inventory of strengths.《价值观与行动(VIA)优势问卷》的量表及条目层面的因素分析
Assessment. 2014 Feb;21(1):4-14. doi: 10.1177/1073191112450612. Epub 2012 Aug 1.
9
Development of a measure of sense of community for individuals with serious mental illness residing in community settings.为居住在社区环境中的严重精神疾病患者制定一种社区归属感测量方法。
J Community Psychol. 2009 Mar 3;37(3):362-380. doi: 10.1002/jcop.20301.
10
The comparative validity of 11 modern personality inventories: predictions of behavioral acts, informant reports, and clinical indicators.11种现代人格量表的比较效度:行为表现、知情者报告及临床指标的预测
J Pers Assess. 2007 Oct;89(2):167-87. doi: 10.1080/00223890701468568.