• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大脑中多词表达的表征与处理。

Representation and processing of multi-word expressions in the brain.

作者信息

Siyanova-Chanturia Anna, Conklin Kathy, Caffarra Sendy, Kaan Edith, van Heuven Walter J B

机构信息

School of Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.

School of English, University of Nottingham, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Brain Lang. 2017 Dec;175:111-122. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2017.10.004. Epub 2017 Nov 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.bandl.2017.10.004
PMID:29078151
Abstract

Language comprehension is sensitive to the predictability of the upcoming information. Prediction allows for smooth, expedient and successful communication. While general discourse-based constraints have been investigated in detail, more specific phrase-level prediction has received little attention. We address this gap by exploring the ERPs elicited during the comprehension of English binomials - familiar and predictable multi-word expressions. In Experiment 1a, participants read binomial expressions (knife and fork), infrequent strongly associated phrases (spoon and fork), and semantic violations (theme and fork). In Experiment 1b, participants read the same stimuli without "and". Experiment 1a revealed that binomials elicited larger P300s and smaller N400s compared to the other conditions, reflecting the activation of a 'template' that matches the upcoming information (P300) and pointing to easier semantic integration (N400). In contrast, no differences were observed between binomials and associates in Experiment 1b. We conclude that distinct mechanisms underlie the processing of predicable and novel sequences.

摘要

语言理解对即将出现的信息的可预测性很敏感。预测有助于实现流畅、便捷且成功的交流。虽然基于一般话语的限制已得到详细研究,但更具体的短语层面的预测却很少受到关注。我们通过探究在理解英语二项式(熟悉且可预测的多词表达)过程中引发的事件相关电位(ERP)来填补这一空白。在实验1a中,参与者阅读二项式表达(刀叉)、不常见的强关联短语(勺子和叉子)以及语义违反情况(主题和叉子)。在实验1b中,参与者阅读相同的刺激材料,但没有“和”。实验1a表明,与其他条件相比,二项式引发了更大的P300和更小的N400,这反映了与即将出现的信息相匹配的“模板”的激活(P300),并表明语义整合更容易(N400)。相比之下,在实验1b中,二项式和关联短语之间未观察到差异。我们得出结论,可预测序列和新序列的处理背后存在不同的机制。

相似文献

1
Representation and processing of multi-word expressions in the brain.大脑中多词表达的表征与处理。
Brain Lang. 2017 Dec;175:111-122. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2017.10.004. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
2
Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations.句子理解过程中句法与语义的相互作用:句法和语义违反相结合的事件相关电位效应
J Cogn Neurosci. 2003 Aug 15;15(6):883-99. doi: 10.1162/089892903322370807.
3
Prior Context and Individual Alpha Frequency Influence Predictive Processing during Language Comprehension.先前语境和个体阿尔法频率影响语言理解中的预测加工。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2024 Sep 1;36(9):1898-1936. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_02196.
4
Predictive mechanisms in idiom comprehension.成语理解中的预测机制。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Aug;22(8):1682-700. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21293.
5
Neural mechanisms of sentence comprehension based on predictive processes and decision certainty: Electrophysiological evidence from non-canonical linearizations in a flexible word order language.基于预测过程和决策确定性的句子理解神经机制:来自一种词序灵活语言中非规范线性化的电生理证据。
Brain Res. 2016 Feb 15;1633:149-166. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.12.045. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
6
Dissociable effects of prediction and integration during language comprehension: evidence from a large-scale study using brain potentials.语言理解过程中预测和整合的可分离效应:一项使用脑电波的大规模研究证据。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Feb 3;375(1791):20180522. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2018.0522. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
7
Time for prediction? The effect of presentation rate on predictive sentence comprehension during word-by-word reading.是预测的时候了?逐词阅读过程中呈现速度对预测性句子理解的影响。
Cortex. 2015 Jul;68:20-32. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.03.014. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
8
The Truth Before and After: Brain Potentials Reveal Automatic Activation of Event Knowledge during Sentence Comprehension.前后之真相:脑电位揭示句子理解过程中事件知识的自动激活
J Cogn Neurosci. 2015 Nov;27(11):2215-28. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00856. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
9
The processing of number and gender agreement in Spanish: an event-related potential investigation of the effects of structural distance.西班牙语中数和格一致的加工:结构距离影响的事件相关电位研究。
Brain Res. 2012 May 25;1456:49-63. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.03.057. Epub 2012 Mar 31.
10
Right hemisphere activation of joke-related information: an event-related brain potential study.与笑话相关信息的右脑激活:一项事件相关脑电位研究。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Mar;17(3):494-506. doi: 10.1162/0898929053279568.

引用本文的文献

1
Chinese EFL learners' processing of English binomials: the role of interlexical and intralexical factors.中国英语学习者对英语成对词的处理:词间和词内因素的作用。
Front Psychol. 2024 Sep 9;15:1425856. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1425856. eCollection 2024.
2
Does the Processing Advantage of Formulaic Language Persist in Its Nonadjacent Forms? Evidence from Eye Movements of Chinese Collocations.公式语言的加工优势是否在其非相邻形式中持续存在?来自汉语搭配的眼动证据。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2024 Mar 12;53(2):28. doi: 10.1007/s10936-024-10040-5.
3
Individual Differences in Holistic and Compositional Language Processing.
整体与组合式语言处理中的个体差异。
J Cogn. 2023 Jun 28;6(1):29. doi: 10.5334/joc.283. eCollection 2023.
4
Does L2 Proficiency Impact L2-L1 Transfer While Reading L1 Collocations? Evidence From Behavioral and ERP Data.二语能力在阅读一语搭配时会影响二语向一语的迁移吗?来自行为和事件相关电位数据的证据。
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 29;12:673761. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.673761. eCollection 2021.
5
Cross-Language Influences in the Processing of Multiword Expressions: From a First Language to Second and Back.多词表达式加工中的跨语言影响:从母语到第二语言再回归母语
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 24;12:666520. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.666520. eCollection 2021.
6
Activation of Literal Word Meanings in Idioms: Evidence from Eye-tracking and ERP Experiments.成语中字面意义的激活:来自眼动和 ERP 实验的证据。
Lang Speech. 2021 Sep;64(3):594-624. doi: 10.1177/0023830920943625. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
7
How Do We Segment Text? Two-Stage Chunking Operation in Reading.我们如何对文本进行分段?阅读中的两阶段分块操作。
eNeuro. 2020 Jun 11;7(3). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0425-19.2020. Print 2020 May/Jun.
8
Similarities and Differences Between Native and Non-native Speakers' Processing of Formulaic Sequences: A Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) Study.本族语者和非本族语者对惯用序列处理的异同:一项功能近红外光谱 (fNIRS) 研究。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2021 Apr;50(2):397-416. doi: 10.1007/s10936-019-09655-w.
9
The Neural Correlates of Conflict Detection and Resolution During Multiword Lexical Selection: Evidence from Bilinguals and Monolinguals.多词词汇选择过程中冲突检测与解决的神经关联:来自双语者和单语者的证据。
Brain Sci. 2019 May 14;9(5):110. doi: 10.3390/brainsci9050110.
10
Compositionality in animals and humans.动物和人类的组合性。
PLoS Biol. 2018 Aug 15;16(8):e2006425. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2006425. eCollection 2018 Aug.