• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成语中字面意义的激活:来自眼动和 ERP 实验的证据。

Activation of Literal Word Meanings in Idioms: Evidence from Eye-tracking and ERP Experiments.

机构信息

University of Tübingen, Germany.

出版信息

Lang Speech. 2021 Sep;64(3):594-624. doi: 10.1177/0023830920943625. Epub 2020 Jul 27.

DOI:10.1177/0023830920943625
PMID:32715872
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8406370/
Abstract

How the language processing system handles formulaic language such as idioms is a matter of debate. We investigated the activation of constituent meanings by means of predictive processing in an eye-tracking experiment and in two ERP experiments (auditory and visual). In the eye-tracking experiment, German-speaking participants listened to idioms in which the final word was excised (). Well before the offset of these idiom fragments, participants fixated on the correct idiom completion () more often than on unrelated distractors (). Moreover, there was an early fixation bias towards semantic associates () of the correct completion, which ended shortly after the offset of the fragment. In the ERP experiments, sentences (spoken or written) either contained complete idioms, or the final word of the idiom was replaced with a semantic associate or with an unrelated word. Across both modalities, ERPs reflected facilitated processing of correct completions across several regions of interest (ROIs) and time windows. Facilitation of semantic associates was only reliably evident in early components for auditory idiom processing. The ERP findings for spoken idioms compliment the eye-tracking data by pointing to early decompositional processing of idioms. It seems that in spoken idiom processing, holistic representations do not solely determine lexical processing.

摘要

语言处理系统如何处理习语等惯用语言是一个有争议的问题。我们通过眼动实验和两个 ERP 实验(听觉和视觉)研究了预测加工中成分意义的激活。在眼动实验中,德语参与者听了最后一个单词被删去的成语()。在这些成语片段结束之前,参与者比不相关的干扰项()更频繁地注视正确的成语完成()。此外,对正确完成的语义联想()存在早期的注视偏向,这种偏向在片段结束后不久就结束了。在 ERP 实验中,句子(口头或书面)要么包含完整的成语,要么成语的最后一个单词被一个语义联想词或一个不相关的词所取代。在两种模态中,ERP 反映了在几个感兴趣区域(ROI)和时间窗口中对正确完成的处理的促进。听觉成语处理中只有早期成分可靠地反映了语义联想的促进作用。口语成语的 ERP 发现通过指向成语的早期分解处理,为眼动数据提供了补充。在口语成语处理中,整体表示似乎并不单独决定词汇处理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3767/8406370/d000b63d1a7b/10.1177_0023830920943625-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3767/8406370/4eebfea983db/10.1177_0023830920943625-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3767/8406370/c2b0b3b3f444/10.1177_0023830920943625-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3767/8406370/d000b63d1a7b/10.1177_0023830920943625-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3767/8406370/4eebfea983db/10.1177_0023830920943625-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3767/8406370/c2b0b3b3f444/10.1177_0023830920943625-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3767/8406370/d000b63d1a7b/10.1177_0023830920943625-fig5.jpg

相似文献

1
Activation of Literal Word Meanings in Idioms: Evidence from Eye-tracking and ERP Experiments.成语中字面意义的激活:来自眼动和 ERP 实验的证据。
Lang Speech. 2021 Sep;64(3):594-624. doi: 10.1177/0023830920943625. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
2
Individual word activation and word frequency effects during the processing of opaque idiomatic expressions.晦涩习语表达处理过程中的单个单词激活和词频效应。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2022 Jun;75(6):1004-1020. doi: 10.1177/17470218211047995. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
3
Spoken idiom recognition: meaning retrieval and word expectancy.口语习语识别:意义检索与词汇预期。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2005 Sep;34(5):465-95. doi: 10.1007/s10936-005-6204-y.
4
Scratching your tête over language-switched idioms: Evidence from eye-movement measures of reading.挠挠头,思考一下那些语言切换的习语:来自阅读眼动测量的证据。
Mem Cognit. 2022 Aug;50(6):1230-1256. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01334-x. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
5
Context-dependent semantic processing in the human brain: evidence from idiom comprehension.人类大脑中语境相关的语义处理:成语理解的证据。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2013 May;25(5):762-76. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00337. Epub 2012 Dec 18.
6
Comprehension of idiomatic expressions: effects of predictability and literality.习语表达的理解:可预测性和字面意义的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1994 Sep;20(5):1126-38. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.20.5.1126.
7
Bilingual and Monolingual Idiom Processing Is Cut from the Same Cloth: The Role of the L1 in Literal and Figurative Meaning Activation.双语和单语习语处理同出一辙:第一语言在字面意义和比喻意义激活中的作用
Front Psychol. 2016 Sep 9;7:1350. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01350. eCollection 2016.
8
Processes of Emotion Idioms Comprehension of Turkish-Speaking People with Wernicke's Aphasia.患有韦尼克失语症的土耳其语使用者对情感习语的理解过程
Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2024;76(4):329-339. doi: 10.1159/000534460. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
9
When the Idiom Advantage Comes Up Short: Eye-Tracking Canonical and Modified Idioms.当习语优势不足时:眼动追踪标准习语和变体习语
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 2;12:675046. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.675046. eCollection 2021.
10
That's the way the cookie bounces: syntactic and semantic components of experimentally elicited idiom blends.事情就是这样:实验诱发的习语混合的句法和语义成分。
Mem Cognit. 1997 Jan;25(1):57-71. doi: 10.3758/bf03197285.

引用本文的文献

1
The processing of familiar English L2 phrasal verbs in neutral and biased sentence contexts.在中性和有偏向性的句子语境中对熟悉的英语二语短语动词的处理。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jun 5;16:1528821. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1528821. eCollection 2025.
2
A mapping-knowledge-domain analysis of ERP research on language processing.关于语言加工的事件相关电位研究的映射知识领域分析。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Jun 12;18:1352753. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1352753. eCollection 2024.
3
A neuro-cognitive model of comprehension based on prediction and unification.

本文引用的文献

1
The Role of Syntactic Variability and Literal Interpretation Plausibility in Idiom Comprehension.句法变异性和字面解释合理性在习语理解中的作用。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2020 Feb;49(1):99-124. doi: 10.1007/s10936-019-09673-8.
2
A Tale of Two Positivities and the N400: Distinct Neural Signatures Are Evoked by Confirmed and Violated Predictions at Different Levels of Representation.两种正性和 N400 的故事:在不同的表征水平上,由确认和违反预测引发的神经信号具有明显差异。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2020 Jan;32(1):12-35. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01465. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
3
Are figurative interpretations of idioms directly retrieved, compositionally built, or both? Evidence from eye movement measures of reading.
一种基于预测和整合的理解神经认知模型。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Apr 9;18:1356541. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1356541. eCollection 2024.
4
The productive processing of formulaic sequences by second language learners in writing.第二语言学习者在写作中对公式化序列的产出性加工。
Front Psychol. 2024 Feb 21;15:1281926. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1281926. eCollection 2024.
5
Different Neural Responses for Unfinished Sentence as a Conventional Indirect Refusal Between Native and Non-native Speakers: An Event-Related Potential Study.母语者与非母语者之间作为传统间接拒绝方式的未完成句子的不同神经反应:一项事件相关电位研究
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 3;13:806023. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.806023. eCollection 2022.
习语的比喻性解释是直接提取的、通过组合构建的,还是两者兼而有之?来自阅读眼动测量的证据。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2019 Dec;73(4):216-230. doi: 10.1037/cep0000175. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
4
Passivizability of Idioms: Has the Wrong Tree Been Barked Up?成语的被动化:是否选错了研究对象?
Lang Speech. 2020 Jun;63(2):404-435. doi: 10.1177/0023830919847691. Epub 2019 May 19.
5
Is All Formulaic Language Created Equal? Unpacking the Processing Advantage for Different Types of Formulaic Sequences.所有公式化语言都一样吗?剖析不同类型公式化序列的加工优势。
Lang Speech. 2020 Mar;63(1):95-122. doi: 10.1177/0023830918823230. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
6
Do 'early' brain responses reveal word form prediction during language comprehension? A critical review.早期大脑反应能否揭示语言理解过程中的词形预测?一项批判性综述。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019 Jan;96:367-400. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.11.019.
7
Dissociating predictability, plausibility and possibility of sentence continuations in reading: evidence from late-positivity ERPs.阅读中句子延续的可预测性、合理性和可能性的分离:来自晚期正电位事件相关电位的证据。
PeerJ. 2018 Oct 12;6:e5717. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5717. eCollection 2018.
8
Representation and processing of multi-word expressions in the brain.大脑中多词表达的表征与处理。
Brain Lang. 2017 Dec;175:111-122. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2017.10.004. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
9
The Role of Multiword Building Blocks in Explaining L1-L2 Differences.多词构建块在解释第一语言与第二语言差异中的作用。
Top Cogn Sci. 2017 Jul;9(3):621-636. doi: 10.1111/tops.12271. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
10
Idiom Variation: Experimental Data and a Blueprint of a Computational Model.习语变体:实验数据与计算模型蓝图
Top Cogn Sci. 2017 Jul;9(3):653-669. doi: 10.1111/tops.12263. Epub 2017 Mar 20.