• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用间接计算机图像比色法对涂抹在皮肤上的防晒霜的视觉外观进行量化。

Quantifying the visual appearance of sunscreens applied to the skin using indirect computer image colorimetry.

作者信息

Richer Vincent, Kharazmi Pegah, Lee Tim K, Kalia Sunil, Lui Harvey

机构信息

Department of Dermatology and Skin Science, University of British Columbia & Photomedicine Institute, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Departments of Cancer Control Research Program and Integrative Oncology - Imaging Unit, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

出版信息

Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2018 Mar;34(2):130-136. doi: 10.1111/phpp.12361. Epub 2017 Nov 20.

DOI:10.1111/phpp.12361
PMID:29080360
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is no accepted method to objectively assess the visual appearance of sunscreens on the skin.

METHODS

We present a method for sunscreen application, digital photography, and computer analysis to quantify the appearance of the skin after sunscreen application. Four sunscreen lotions were applied randomly at densities of 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 mg/cm to areas of the back of 29 subjects. Each application site had a matched contralateral control area. High-resolution standardized photographs including a color card were taken after sunscreen application. After color balance correction, CIE Lab* color values were extracted from paired sites. Differences in skin appearance attributed to sunscreen were represented by ΔE, which in turn was calculated from the linear Euclidean distance within the Lab* color space between the paired sites.

RESULTS

Sunscreen visibility as measured by median ΔE varied across different products and application densities and ranged between 1.2 and 12.1. The visibility of sunscreens varied according to product SPF, composition (organic vs inorganic), presence of tint, and baseline b* of skin (P < .05 for all).

CONCLUSION

Standardized sunscreen application followed by digital photography and indirect computer-based colorimetry represents a potential method to objectively quantify visibility of sunscreen on the skin.

摘要

背景

目前尚无公认的客观评估防晒霜在皮肤上视觉外观的方法。

方法

我们提出了一种用于涂抹防晒霜、数码摄影和计算机分析的方法,以量化涂抹防晒霜后皮肤的外观。将四种防晒乳液以0.5、1.0、1.5和2.0毫克/平方厘米的密度随机涂抹在29名受试者背部的不同区域。每个涂抹部位都有一个与之匹配的对侧对照区域。涂抹防晒霜后拍摄包括色卡在内的高分辨率标准化照片。在进行色彩平衡校正后,从配对部位提取CIE Lab颜色值。防晒霜导致的皮肤外观差异用ΔE表示,它是根据Lab颜色空间中配对部位之间的线性欧几里得距离计算得出的。

结果

通过中位数ΔE测量的防晒霜可见度因不同产品和涂抹密度而异,范围在1.2至12.1之间。防晒霜的可见度因产品的防晒系数、成分(有机与无机)、是否有色调以及皮肤的基线b*而异(所有P值均<0.05)。

结论

标准化的防晒霜涂抹方法,随后进行数码摄影和基于计算机的间接比色法,是一种客观量化防晒霜在皮肤上可见度的潜在方法。

相似文献

1
Quantifying the visual appearance of sunscreens applied to the skin using indirect computer image colorimetry.使用间接计算机图像比色法对涂抹在皮肤上的防晒霜的视觉外观进行量化。
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2018 Mar;34(2):130-136. doi: 10.1111/phpp.12361. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
2
Subjective and objective assessment of color match of universal tinted sunscreens in Fitzpatrick skin phototypes I-VI.主观和客观评估通用有色防晒霜在 Fitzpatrick 皮肤光型 I-VI 中的颜色匹配度。
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2024 Sep;40(5):e12992. doi: 10.1111/phpp.12992.
3
Broad-spectrum sunscreens containing the TriAsorB™ filter: In vitro photoprotection and clinical evaluation of blue light-induced skin pigmentation.广谱防晒霜中含有 TriAsorB™ 滤光剂:体外对蓝光诱导皮肤色素沉着的光保护作用和临床评估。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2023 Oct;37 Suppl 6:12-21. doi: 10.1111/jdv.19290.
4
Effect of daily versus intermittent sunscreen application on solar simulated UV radiation-induced skin response in humans.每日涂抹防晒霜与间歇性涂抹防晒霜对人体模拟太阳紫外线辐射引起的皮肤反应的影响。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000 Oct;43(4):610-8. doi: 10.1067/mjd.2000.107244.
5
Accumulation of sunscreen in human skin after daily applications: a study of sunscreens with different ultraviolet radiation filters.日常使用防晒霜后在人体皮肤中的累积:不同紫外线过滤剂的防晒霜研究。
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2012 Jun;28(3):127-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0781.2012.00651.x.
6
Factors that influence sunscreen application thickness and potential preservative exposure.影响防晒霜涂抹厚度及潜在防腐剂接触量的因素。
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2015 Jul;31(4):212-23. doi: 10.1111/phpp.12171. Epub 2015 Apr 5.
7
High-SPF sunscreens (SPF ≥ 70) may provide ultraviolet protection above minimal recommended levels by adequately compensating for lower sunscreen user application amounts.高 SPF 防晒霜(SPF≥70)通过充分补偿防晒霜使用者较低的涂抹量,可能会提供高于最低建议水平的紫外线防护。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012 Dec;67(6):1220-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2012.02.029. Epub 2012 Mar 30.
8
Layer Thickness of SPF 30 Sunscreen and Formation of Pre-vitamin D.SPF 30防晒霜的层厚度与前维生素D的形成
Anticancer Res. 2016 Mar;36(3):1409-15.
9
Sunscreen use optimized by two consecutive applications.防晒霜通过连续两次使用来优化效果。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 28;13(3):e0193916. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193916. eCollection 2018.
10
A randomized study to evaluate the efficacy and effectiveness of two sunscreen formulations on Indian skin types IV and V with pigmentation irregularities.一项随机研究,旨在评估两种防晒配方对印度IV型和V型伴有色素沉着异常皮肤类型的疗效和有效性。
Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2019 Mar-Apr;85(2):160-168. doi: 10.4103/ijdvl.IJDVL_932_17.

引用本文的文献

1
A standardized scoring method for measuring white cast of mineral sunscreens and improving user compliance across diverse skin tones.一种用于测量矿物防晒霜白色痕迹并提高不同肤色用户依从性的标准化评分方法。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 26;20(8):e0319891. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319891. eCollection 2025.
2
Assessing Sunscreen Protection Using UV Photography: Descriptive Study.使用紫外线摄影评估防晒霜的防护效果:描述性研究。
JMIR Dermatol. 2021 May 26;4(1):e24653. doi: 10.2196/24653.
3
Color variations during digital imaging of facial prostheses subjected to unfiltered ambient light and image calibration techniques within dental clinics: An in vitro analysis.
在牙科诊所中,未经过滤的环境光和图像校准技术对面部赝复体的数字成像中的颜色变化:一项体外分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 29;17(8):e0273029. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273029. eCollection 2022.