JMC Consultancy European Office,Aynsley Court,Sandwich,Kent CT13 9DU,UK.
Br J Nutr. 2018 Aug;120(s1):S1-S7. doi: 10.1017/S0007114517002227. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
First promulgated in 1959, the 3Rs of Replacement, Reduction and Refinement have evolved as fundamental principles underlying the use of animals and alternatives in science throughout the modern world. This review describes a contemporary approach to delivering the 3Rs through acknowledging the contribution of new technologies and emphasising that applying the 3Rs can be beneficial to good science as well as to animal welfare. This science-led approach moves the concept of the 3Rs out of an ethical silo where they were often considered by scientists to be an inconvenient obligation. On the contrary, relevant examples demonstrate the opportunity to practise better science using 3Rs technologies which deliver faster, more reproducible and more cost-effective results. Indeed, methods harnessing Replacement approaches may permit discoveries which are simply not feasible using animals and frequently are more flexible and agile since compliance with regulatory oversight requirements is simplified. Although the necessity for rigorous oversight is well recognised, it is important that the associated bureaucracy is not allowed to become prohibitive, causing scientists to avoid pursuing justifiable and important research involving animals. Public support for research is conditional - animals should not suffer unnecessarily and sufficient potential benefit should accrue from the research. However, society also actively seeks pioneering medical and scientific advances which can only be achieved through research. Therefore, a balance must be struck between safeguarding animal welfare whilst enabling high-quality science. It is this balance which promotes and sustains public confidence that animal based research is acceptable and being appropriately managed.
1959 年首次颁布的替代、减少和优化的 3R 原则已发展成为现代世界科学中使用动物和替代物的基本原则。本综述描述了一种通过承认新技术的贡献并强调应用 3R 原则不仅对动物福利有益,而且对科学有益的当代方法。这种以科学为导向的方法将 3R 原则的概念从伦理的孤立状态中转移出来,在这种孤立状态中,科学家们常常认为它们是一种不方便的义务。相反,相关的例子表明,使用 3R 技术可以更好地进行科学研究,从而获得更快、更可重复和更具成本效益的结果。事实上,利用替代方法的方法可以实现使用动物根本不可行的发现,并且通常更灵活和敏捷,因为简化了对监管监督要求的遵守。尽管严格监督的必要性得到了广泛认可,但重要的是,相关的官僚主义不应变得令人生畏,导致科学家避免从事涉及动物的合理和重要的研究。公众对研究的支持是有条件的——动物不应遭受不必要的痛苦,并且应该从研究中获得足够的潜在收益。然而,社会也积极寻求开创性的医学和科学进步,而这些进步只能通过研究来实现。因此,必须在保障动物福利和促进高质量科学之间取得平衡。正是这种平衡促进和维持了公众的信心,即基于动物的研究是可以接受的,并得到了适当的管理。