• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国本土畜牧业甲烷排放的自下而上网格化清单中的差异和不确定性。

Discrepancies and Uncertainties in Bottom-up Gridded Inventories of Livestock Methane Emissions for the Contiguous United States.

机构信息

ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company, Annandale, New Jersey 08801, United States.

出版信息

Environ Sci Technol. 2017 Dec 5;51(23):13668-13677. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b03332. Epub 2017 Nov 22.

DOI:10.1021/acs.est.7b03332
PMID:29094590
Abstract

In this analysis we used a spatially explicit, simplified bottom-up approach, based on animal inventories, feed dry matter intake, and feed intake-based emission factors to estimate county-level enteric methane emissions for cattle and manure methane emissions for cattle, swine, and poultry for the contiguous United States. Overall, this analysis yielded total livestock methane emissions (8916 Gg/yr; lower and upper 95% confidence bounds of ±19.3%) for 2012 (last census of agriculture) that are comparable to the current USEPA estimates for 2012 and to estimates from the global gridded Emission Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR) inventory. However, the spatial distribution of emissions developed in this analysis differed significantly from that of EDGAR and a recent gridded inventory based on USEPA. Combined enteric and manure methane emissions from livestock in Texas and California (highest contributors to the national total) in this study were 36% lesser and 100% greater, respectively, than estimates by EDGAR. The spatial distribution of emissions in gridded inventories (e.g., EDGAR) likely strongly impacts the conclusions of top-down approaches that use them, especially in the source attribution of resulting (posterior) emissions, and hence conclusions from such studies should be interpreted with caution.

摘要

在本分析中,我们使用了一种基于动物清单、饲料干物质摄入量和基于饲料摄入量的排放因子的空间明确、简化的自下而上方法,来估算美国大陆的县一级牛的肠道甲烷排放和牛、猪和家禽的粪便甲烷排放。总体而言,本分析得出了 2012 年(上一次农业普查)的牲畜甲烷总排放量(8916Gg/yr;95%置信区间下限和上限分别为±19.3%),与当前美国环保局对 2012 年的估计以及全球大气研究排放数据库(EDGAR)清单的估计相当。然而,本分析中开发的排放空间分布与 EDGAR 和最近基于美国环保局的网格化清单有显著差异。本研究中,德克萨斯州和加利福尼亚州(对全国总量贡献最大的两个州)的牲畜肠道和粪便甲烷总排放量分别比 EDGAR 的估计低 36%和高 100%。网格化清单中的排放空间分布(例如,EDGAR)可能会强烈影响使用它们的自上而下方法的结论,尤其是在归因于排放的结论中,因此,应谨慎解释此类研究的结论。

相似文献

1
Discrepancies and Uncertainties in Bottom-up Gridded Inventories of Livestock Methane Emissions for the Contiguous United States.美国本土畜牧业甲烷排放的自下而上网格化清单中的差异和不确定性。
Environ Sci Technol. 2017 Dec 5;51(23):13668-13677. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b03332. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
2
Revised methane emissions factors and spatially distributed annual carbon fluxes for global livestock.全球牲畜的修订甲烷排放因子和空间分布年度碳通量
Carbon Balance Manag. 2017 Sep 29;12(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s13021-017-0084-y.
3
Short-term methane emissions from 2 dairy farms in California estimated by different measurement techniques and US Environmental Protection Agency inventory methodology: A case study.加利福尼亚州 2 家奶牛场的短期甲烷排放估算:不同测量技术与美国环境保护署清单方法的比较:一项案例研究。
J Dairy Sci. 2018 Dec;101(12):11461-11479. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13881. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
4
Gridded National Inventory of U.S. Methane Emissions.网格化美国甲烷排放清单
Environ Sci Technol. 2016 Dec 6;50(23):13123-13133. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b02878. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
5
Anthropogenic emissions of methane in the United States.美国人为源甲烷排放。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Dec 10;110(50):20018-22. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1314392110. Epub 2013 Nov 25.
6
A Gridded Inventory of Annual 2012-2018 U.S. Anthropogenic Methane Emissions.网格化的 2012-2018 年美国人为源甲烷排放清单。
Environ Sci Technol. 2023 Oct 31;57(43):16276-16288. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.3c05138. Epub 2023 Oct 19.
7
Global nitrous oxide emissions from livestock manure during 1890-2020: An IPCC tier 2 inventory.全球 1890-2020 年家畜粪便中的氧化亚氮排放:IPCC 第 2 层清单。
Glob Chang Biol. 2024 May;30(5):e17303. doi: 10.1111/gcb.17303.
8
Comparison of emission estimates for non-CO2 greenhouse gases from livestock and poultry in Korea from 1990 to 2010.1990年至2010年韩国畜禽非二氧化碳温室气体排放估算比较。
Anim Sci J. 2016 Apr;87(4):612-23. doi: 10.1111/asj.12456. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
9
Symposium review: Uncertainties in enteric methane inventories, measurement techniques, and prediction models.研讨会综述:肠道甲烷清单、测量技术和预测模型中的不确定性。
J Dairy Sci. 2018 Jul;101(7):6655-6674. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13536. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
10
Prediction of enteric methane emissions from cattle.预测牛的肠道甲烷排放。
Glob Chang Biol. 2014 Jul;20(7):2140-8. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12471. Epub 2014 Apr 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Anthropogenic emission is the main contributor to the rise of atmospheric methane during 1993-2017.人为排放是1993年至2017年期间大气甲烷上升的主要原因。
Natl Sci Rev. 2021 Nov 11;9(5):nwab200. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwab200. eCollection 2022 May.
2
Top-Down Constraints on Methane Point Source Emissions From Animal Agriculture and Waste Based on New Airborne Measurements in the U.S. Upper Midwest.基于美国中西部上空新的航空测量数据对畜牧业和废弃物甲烷点源排放的自上而下约束
J Geophys Res Biogeosci. 2020 Jan;125(1). doi: 10.1029/2019jg005429. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
3
Aircraft-based inversions quantify the importance of wetlands and livestock for Upper Midwest methane emissions.
基于飞机监测的反演技术量化了湿地和牲畜对美国中西部上游地区甲烷排放的重要性。
Atmos Chem Phys. 2021 Jan;21(2):951-971. doi: 10.5194/acp-21-951-2021. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
4
Dietary mitigation of enteric methane emissions from ruminants: A review of plant tannin mitigation options.通过饮食减轻反刍动物肠道甲烷排放:植物单宁减轻排放方案综述
Anim Nutr. 2020 Sep;6(3):231-246. doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2020.05.002. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
5
Revisiting enteric methane emissions from domestic ruminants and their δC source signature.重新审视家畜反刍动物的肠道甲烷排放及其 δC 源特征。
Nat Commun. 2019 Jul 31;10(1):3420. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11066-3.