Yu Xueying, Millet Dylan B, Wells Kelley C, Griffis Timothy J, Chen Xin, Baker John M, Conley Stephen A, Smith Mackenzie L, Gvakharia Alexander, Kort Eric A, Plant Genevieve, Wood Jeffrey D
Department of Soil, Water, and Climate, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, Saint Paul, MN, USA.
Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, St. Paul, MN, USA.
J Geophys Res Biogeosci. 2020 Jan;125(1). doi: 10.1029/2019jg005429. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
Agriculture and waste are thought to account for half or more of the U.S. anthropogenic methane source. However, current bottom-up inventories contain inherent uncertainties from extrapolating limited in situ measurements to larger scales. Here, we employ new airborne methane measurements over the U.S. Corn Belt and Upper Midwest, among the most intensive agricultural regions in the world, to quantify emissions from an array of key agriculture and waste point sources. Nine of the largest concentrated animal feeding operations in the region and two sugar processing plants were measured, with multiple revisits during summer (August 2017), winter (January 2018), and spring (May-June 2018). We compare the top-down fluxes with state-of-science bottom-up estimates informed by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency methodology and site-level animal population and management practices. Top-down point source emissions are consistent with bottom-up estimates for beef concentrated animal feeding operations but moderately lower for dairies (by 37% on average) and significantly lower for sugar plants (by 80% on average). Swine facility results are more variable. The assumed bottom-up seasonality for manure methane emissions is not apparent in the aircraft measurements, which may be due to on-site management factors that are difficult to capture accurately in national-scale inventories. If not properly accounted for, such seasonal disparities could lead to source misattribution in top-down assessments of methane fluxes.
农业和废弃物被认为占美国人为甲烷源的一半或更多。然而,当前的自下而上清单存在固有不确定性,即从有限的现场测量外推到更大尺度。在此,我们在美国玉米带和中西部上游地区进行了新的机载甲烷测量,这些地区是世界上农业最密集的地区之一,以量化一系列关键农业和废弃物点源的排放。对该地区九个最大的集中式动物饲养场和两家制糖厂进行了测量,在夏季(2017年8月)、冬季(2018年1月)和春季(2018年5月至6月)进行了多次复测。我们将自上而下的通量与基于美国环境保护局方法以及场地层面动物数量和管理实践得出的科学自下而上估计值进行比较。自上而下的点源排放与牛肉集中式动物饲养场的自下而上估计值一致,但奶牛场的排放略低(平均低37%),制糖厂的排放则显著更低(平均低80%)。养猪场的结果差异更大。飞机测量中未体现出粪便甲烷排放自下而上假定的季节性,这可能是由于现场管理因素,而这些因素在国家尺度清单中难以准确捕捉。如果没有得到妥善考虑,这种季节性差异可能会导致在甲烷通量的自上而下评估中出现源归因错误。