Bunlungsup Srichan, Kanthaswamy Sree, Oldt Robert F, Smith David Glenn, Houghton Paul, Hamada Yuzuru, Malaivijitnond Suchinda
Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
School of Mathematical and Natural Sciences, New College of Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences, Arizona State University West Campus, Glendale, Arizona.
Am J Primatol. 2017 Dec;79(12). doi: 10.1002/ajp.22726. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
In the past decade, many researchers have published papers about hybridization between long-tailed and rhesus macaques. These previous works have proposed unidirectional gene flow with the Isthmus of Kra as the zoogeographical barrier of hybridization. However, these reports analyzed specimens of unknown origin and/or did not include specimens from Thailand, the center of the proposed area of hybridization. Collected specimens of long-tailed and rhesus macaques representing all suspected hybridization areas were examined. Blood samples from four populations each of long-tailed and rhesus macaques inhabiting Thailand, Myanmar, and Laos were collected and analyzed with conspecific references from China (for rhesus macaques) and multiple countries from Sundaic regions (for long-tailed macaques). Ninety-six single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers specifically designed to interrogate admixture and ancestry were used in genotyping. We found genetic admixture maximized at the hybrid zone (15-20°N), as well as admixture signals of varying strength in both directions outside of the hybrid zone. These findings show that the Isthmus of Kra is not a barrier to gene flow from rhesus to long-tailed populations. However, to precisely identify a southernmost barrier, if in fact a boundary rather than simple isolation by distance exists, the samples from peninsular Malaysia must be included in the analysis. Additionally, a long-tailed to rhesus gene flow boundary was found between northern Thailand and Myanmar. Our results suggest that selection of long-tailed and rhesus macaques, the two most commonly used non-human primates for biomedical research, should take into account not only the species identification but also the origin of and genetic admixture within and between the species.
在过去十年中,许多研究人员发表了关于长尾猕猴和恒河猴杂交的论文。这些先前的研究提出了单向基因流动,以克拉地峡作为杂交的动物地理屏障。然而,这些报告分析的是来源不明的样本,和/或没有包括来自所提议杂交区域中心泰国的样本。我们检查了收集到的代表所有疑似杂交区域的长尾猕猴和恒河猴样本。采集了分别来自泰国、缅甸和老挝的四个长尾猕猴种群和四个恒河猴种群的血样,并与来自中国的同物种参照样本(用于恒河猴)和巽他地区多个国家的样本(用于长尾猕猴)进行了分析。使用专门设计用于检测混合和祖先的96个单核苷酸多态性(SNP)标记进行基因分型。我们发现基因混合在杂交区域(北纬15 - 20°)达到最大值,并且在杂交区域之外的两个方向都有强度不同的混合信号。这些发现表明,克拉地峡并不是恒河猴向长尾猕猴种群基因流动的障碍。然而,要精确确定最南端的屏障,如果实际上存在的是边界而非简单的距离隔离,那么来自马来西亚半岛的样本必须纳入分析。此外,在泰国北部和缅甸之间发现了从长尾猕猴到恒河猴的基因流动边界。我们的结果表明,在选择长尾猕猴和恒河猴这两种生物医学研究中最常用的非人类灵长类动物时,不仅应考虑物种鉴定,还应考虑物种内部和物种之间的起源及基因混合情况。