Maeda M, Yokota M, Iwase M, Miyahara T, Hayashi H, Sotobata I
First Department of Internal Medicine, Nagoya University School of Medicine, Japan.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989 Jan;13(1):76-83. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(89)90552-4.
To estimate the accuracy of cardiac output measured by continuous wave Doppler echocardiography from the suprasternal notch and the utility of this method for evaluating left ventricular function during dynamic exercise, simultaneous thermodilution and Doppler cardiac output were measured in 34 patients with coronary artery disease during multistage ergometer exercise in the supine position. Cardiac output was measured at rest and during each stage of exercise. Twenty-five of the 34 patients whose thermodilution curves were adequate for analysis were studied during exercise. The correlation coefficient for the two methods was 0.85 at rest and 0.84 during exercise. Differences between the two methods were not significant at rest but were significant during exercise, with the thermodilution method giving the higher values. Underestimation by the Doppler method is probably due to technical problems and changes in aortic diameter during exercise. The 25 patients were classified into two groups according to pulmonary artery wedge pressure at peak exercise. There were 11 patients in Group 1 pressure (greater than or equal to 20 mm Hg at peak exercise) and 14 in Group 2 pressure (less than 20 mm Hg at peak exercise). There were significant differences in the change in cardiac index and in peak aortic velocity from rest to peak exercise between the two groups. A significant linear correlation between the percent change in peak aortic velocity and in pulmonary artery wedge pressure from rest to peak exercise was observed (r = -0.66, p less than 0.001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
为评估经胸骨上切迹连续波多普勒超声心动图测量心输出量的准确性以及该方法在动态运动期间评估左心室功能的效用,对34例冠心病患者在仰卧位进行多级测力计运动期间同时测量热稀释法和多普勒心输出量。在静息状态及运动的每个阶段测量心输出量。对34例中热稀释曲线适合分析的25例患者在运动期间进行研究。两种方法在静息时的相关系数为0.85,运动时为0.84。两种方法在静息时差异不显著,但在运动时差异显著,热稀释法测得的值更高。多普勒法低估可能是由于技术问题以及运动期间主动脉直径的变化。根据运动峰值时的肺动脉楔压将25例患者分为两组。第1组压力(运动峰值时大于或等于20 mmHg)有11例患者,第2组压力(运动峰值时小于20 mmHg)有14例患者。两组之间静息至运动峰值时心脏指数的变化以及主动脉峰值速度有显著差异。观察到静息至运动峰值时主动脉峰值速度变化百分比与肺动脉楔压之间存在显著线性相关(r = -0.66,p<0.001)。(摘要截短于250字)