• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于认知特征的首发精神分裂症和重度抑郁症的神经认知图谱。

Neurocognitive Graphs of First-Episode Schizophrenia and Major Depression Based on Cognitive Features.

机构信息

Mental Health Centre, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.

Huaxi Brain Research Centre, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.

出版信息

Neurosci Bull. 2018 Apr;34(2):312-320. doi: 10.1007/s12264-017-0190-6. Epub 2017 Nov 2.

DOI:10.1007/s12264-017-0190-6
PMID:29098645
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5856717/
Abstract

Neurocognitive deficits are frequently observed in patients with schizophrenia and major depressive disorder (MDD). The relations between cognitive features may be represented by neurocognitive graphs based on cognitive features, modeled as Gaussian Markov random fields. However, it is unclear whether it is possible to differentiate between phenotypic patterns associated with the differential diagnosis of schizophrenia and depression using this neurocognitive graph approach. In this study, we enrolled 215 first-episode patients with schizophrenia (FES), 125 with MDD, and 237 demographically-matched healthy controls (HCs). The cognitive performance of all participants was evaluated using a battery of neurocognitive tests. The graphical LASSO model was trained with a one-vs-one scenario to learn the conditional independent structure of neurocognitive features of each group. Participants in the holdout dataset were classified into different groups with the highest likelihood. A partial correlation matrix was transformed from the graphical model to further explore the neurocognitive graph for each group. The classification approach identified the diagnostic class for individuals with an average accuracy of 73.41% for FES vs HC, 67.07% for MDD vs HC, and 59.48% for FES vs MDD. Both of the neurocognitive graphs for FES and MDD had more connections and higher node centrality than those for HC. The neurocognitive graph for FES was less sparse and had more connections than that for MDD. Thus, neurocognitive graphs based on cognitive features are promising for describing endophenotypes that may discriminate schizophrenia from depression.

摘要

神经认知缺陷在精神分裂症和重度抑郁症(MDD)患者中经常观察到。认知特征之间的关系可以通过基于认知特征的神经认知图来表示,这些图建模为高斯马尔可夫随机场。然而,目前尚不清楚是否可以使用这种神经认知图方法来区分与精神分裂症和抑郁症鉴别诊断相关的表型模式。在这项研究中,我们纳入了 215 名首发精神分裂症(FES)患者、125 名 MDD 患者和 237 名人口统计学匹配的健康对照者(HCs)。所有参与者的认知表现均使用一系列神经认知测试进行评估。图形 LASSO 模型使用一对一方案进行训练,以学习每个组的神经认知特征的条件独立结构。使用最高似然度将保留数据集的参与者分类为不同的组。从图形模型转换出偏相关矩阵,以进一步探索每个组的神经认知图。分类方法确定了个体的诊断类别,对于 FES 与 HC、MDD 与 HC 和 FES 与 MDD 的平均准确率分别为 73.41%、67.07%和 59.48%。FES 和 MDD 的神经认知图都比 HC 具有更多的连接和更高的节点中心度。FES 的神经认知图比 MDD 的神经认知图不那么稀疏,并且具有更多的连接。因此,基于认知特征的神经认知图有望描述可能区分精神分裂症和抑郁症的表型。

相似文献

1
Neurocognitive Graphs of First-Episode Schizophrenia and Major Depression Based on Cognitive Features.基于认知特征的首发精神分裂症和重度抑郁症的神经认知图谱。
Neurosci Bull. 2018 Apr;34(2):312-320. doi: 10.1007/s12264-017-0190-6. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
2
Convergence and divergence of neurocognitive patterns in schizophrenia and depression.精神分裂症和抑郁症中神经认知模式的趋同与发散。
Schizophr Res. 2018 Feb;192:327-334. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2017.06.004. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
3
Subcortical Brain Volumes Relate to Neurocognition in First-Episode Schizophrenia, Bipolar Disorder, Major Depression Disorder, and Healthy Controls.皮层下脑容量与首发精神分裂症、双相情感障碍、重度抑郁症及健康对照者的神经认知相关。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jan 25;12:747386. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.747386. eCollection 2021.
4
Co-morbid depressive disorder is associated with better neurocognitive performance in first episode schizophrenia spectrum.共病抑郁障碍与首发精神分裂症谱系的更好的神经认知表现相关。
J Affect Disord. 2018 Mar 15;229:498-505. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.12.088. Epub 2018 Jan 3.
5
Neurocognitive impairments in individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis: Who will really convert?超高危精神病个体的神经认知障碍:谁会真正转化?
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2015 May;49(5):462-70. doi: 10.1177/0004867414561527. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
6
Transdiagnostic neurocognitive deficits in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia: A 1-year follow-up study.2 型糖尿病、重性抑郁障碍、双相情感障碍和精神分裂症患者的跨诊断神经认知缺陷:一项为期 1 年的随访研究。
J Affect Disord. 2022 Mar 1;300:99-108. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.12.074. Epub 2021 Dec 26.
7
Cognitive and emotional biomarkers of melancholic depression: An iSPOT-D report.忧郁性抑郁症的认知和情感生物标志物:iSPOT-D 报告。
J Affect Disord. 2015 May 1;176:141-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.01.061. Epub 2015 Feb 7.
8
Individualized identification of euthymic bipolar disorder using the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) and machine learning.使用剑桥神经心理测试自动成套系统(CANTAB)和机器学习对双相情感障碍缓解期进行个体化识别。
J Affect Disord. 2016 Mar 1;192:219-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.12.053. Epub 2015 Dec 30.
9
Predictors of neurocognitive impairment at 2years after a first-episode major depressive disorder.首发重性抑郁障碍 2 年后神经认知损伤的预测因素。
Compr Psychiatry. 2016 Jul;68:24-33. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2016.03.009. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
10
Comparison of cognitive deficits among drug-naive patients with schizophrenia and major depressive disorder.初发未用药的精神分裂症患者与重度抑郁症患者认知缺陷的比较。
J Affect Disord. 2015 Apr 1;175:133-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.12.059. Epub 2015 Jan 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial intelligence in mental health care: a systematic review of diagnosis, monitoring, and intervention applications.精神卫生保健中的人工智能:对诊断、监测及干预应用的系统评价
Psychol Med. 2025 Feb 6;55:e18. doi: 10.1017/S0033291724003295.
2
The different impacts of functional network centrality and connectivity on the complexity of brain signals in healthy control and first-episode drug-naïve patients with major depressive disorder.功能网络中心性和连通性对健康对照者及首发未用药的重度抑郁症患者脑信号复杂性的不同影响。
Brain Imaging Behav. 2025 Feb;19(1):111-123. doi: 10.1007/s11682-024-00923-5. Epub 2024 Nov 13.
3
Diagnosis of Schizophrenia Based on the Data of Various Modalities: Biomarkers and Machine Learning Techniques (Review).基于多种模态数据的精神分裂症诊断:生物标志物和机器学习技术(综述)。
Sovrem Tekhnologii Med. 2022;14(5):53-75. doi: 10.17691/stm2022.14.5.06. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
4
Methodological and Quality Flaws in the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Mental Health Research: Systematic Review.心理健康研究中人工智能应用的方法学与质量缺陷:系统评价
JMIR Ment Health. 2023 Feb 2;10:e42045. doi: 10.2196/42045.
5
Networks of Neuropsychological Functions in the Clinical Evaluation of Adult ADHD.成人 ADHD 临床评估中的神经心理学功能网络。
Assessment. 2023 Sep;30(6):1719-1736. doi: 10.1177/10731911221118673. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
6
Eye Movements and Cognitive Functioning in Patients With Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders: Network Analysis.精神分裂症谱系障碍患者的眼动与认知功能:网络分析
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Nov 10;12:736228. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.736228. eCollection 2021.
7
HPA Axis in the Pathomechanism of Depression and Schizophrenia: New Therapeutic Strategies Based on Its Participation.抑郁症和精神分裂症发病机制中的下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺轴:基于其参与作用的新治疗策略
Brain Sci. 2021 Sep 30;11(10):1298. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11101298.
8
Network analysis of cognitive deficit in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders.精神分裂症谱系障碍患者认知缺陷的网络分析
Schizophr Res Cogn. 2021 Aug 19;26:100213. doi: 10.1016/j.scog.2021.100213. eCollection 2021 Dec.
9
Schizophrenia: A Survey of Artificial Intelligence Techniques Applied to Detection and Classification.精神分裂症:人工智能技术在检测和分类中的应用调查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 5;18(11):6099. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18116099.
10
Histamine H receptor deletion in cholinergic neurons induces sensorimotor gating ability deficit and social impairments in mice.胆碱能神经元中组氨酸 H 受体缺失导致小鼠感觉运动门控能力缺陷和社交障碍。
Nat Commun. 2021 Feb 18;12(1):1142. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21476-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of neurocognitive function in major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia in later life: A cross-sectional study of euthymic or remitted, non-demented patients using the Japanese version of the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS-J).老年期单相抑郁障碍、双相障碍和精神分裂症患者神经认知功能的比较:使用日本版简明精神分裂症认知评估量表(BACS-J)对非痴呆、病情缓解或稳定的患者进行的横断面研究。
Psychiatry Res. 2017 Aug;254:205-210. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.04.058. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
2
A Review of the Functional and Anatomical Default Mode Network in Schizophrenia.精神分裂症的功能和解剖默认模式网络综述。
Neurosci Bull. 2017 Feb;33(1):73-84. doi: 10.1007/s12264-016-0090-1. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
3
Cortical thickness and surface area correlates with cognitive dysfunction among first-episode psychosis patients.首发精神病患者的皮质厚度和表面积与认知功能障碍相关。
Psychol Med. 2016 Jul;46(10):2145-55. doi: 10.1017/S0033291716000684. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
4
Molecular, Functional, and Structural Imaging of Major Depressive Disorder.重度抑郁症的分子、功能和结构成像
Neurosci Bull. 2016 Jun;32(3):273-85. doi: 10.1007/s12264-016-0030-0. Epub 2016 May 3.
5
Individualized identification of euthymic bipolar disorder using the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) and machine learning.使用剑桥神经心理测试自动成套系统(CANTAB)和机器学习对双相情感障碍缓解期进行个体化识别。
J Affect Disord. 2016 Mar 1;192:219-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.12.053. Epub 2015 Dec 30.
6
Bilaterally reduced claustral volumes in schizophrenia and major depressive disorder: a morphometric postmortem study.精神分裂症和重度抑郁症患者双侧屏状核体积减小:一项尸体形态学研究
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2016 Feb;266(1):25-33. doi: 10.1007/s00406-015-0597-x. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
7
Large-Scale Network Dysfunction in Major Depressive Disorder: A Meta-analysis of Resting-State Functional Connectivity.重度抑郁症的大规模网络功能障碍:静息态功能连接的荟萃分析。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2015 Jun;72(6):603-11. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.0071.
8
Increased expression of retinoic acid-induced gene 1 in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depression.精神分裂症、双相情感障碍和重度抑郁症患者背外侧前额叶皮质中维甲酸诱导基因 1 的表达增加。
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2015 Feb 4;11:279-89. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S72536. eCollection 2015.
9
Predicting node degree centrality with the node prominence profile.用节点显著度轮廓预测节点度中心度。
Sci Rep. 2014 Nov 28;4:7236. doi: 10.1038/srep07236.
10
Predicting methylphenidate response in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a preliminary study.预测注意力缺陷多动障碍中哌甲酯的反应:一项初步研究。
J Psychopharmacol. 2015 Jan;29(1):24-30. doi: 10.1177/0269881114548438. Epub 2014 Sep 18.