Shi Jing, Guo Hua, Liu Sijia, Xue Wei, Fan Fengmei, Li Hui, Fan Hongzhen, An Huimei, Wang Zhiren, Tan Shuping, Yang Fude, Tan Yunlong
Beijing Huilongguan Hospital, Peking University HuiLongGuan Clinical Medical School, Beijing, China.
The Psychiatric Hospital of Zhumadian, Zhumadian, China.
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jan 25;12:747386. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.747386. eCollection 2021.
To explore differences and similarities in relationships between subcortical structure volumes and neurocognition among the four subject groups, including first-episode schizophrenia (FES), bipolar disorder (BD), major depression disorder (MDD), and healthy controls (HCs).
We presented findings from subcortical volumes and neurocognitive analyses of 244 subjects (109 patients with FES; 63 patients with BD, 30 patients with MDD, and 42 HCs). Using the FreeSurfer software, volumes of 16 selected subcortical structures were automatically segmented and analyzed for relationships with results from seven neurocognitive tests from the MATRICS (Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia) Cognitive Consensus Battery (MCCB).
Larger left lateral ventricle volumes in FES and BD, reduced bilateral hippocampus and amygdala volumes in FES, and lower bilateral amygdala volumes in BD and MDD were presented compared with HCs, and both FES and BD had a lower bilateral amygdala volume than MDD; there were seven cognitive dimension, five cognitive dimension, and two cognitive dimension impairments in FES, BD, and MDD, respectively; significant relationships were found between subcortical volumes and neurocognition in FES and BD but not in MDD and HCs; besides age and years of education, some subcortical volumes can predict neurocognitive performances variance.
The different degrees of subcortical volume lessening may contribute to the differences in cognitive impairment among the three psychiatric disorders.
探讨首发精神分裂症(FES)、双相情感障碍(BD)、重度抑郁症(MDD)和健康对照(HCs)这四组研究对象的皮质下结构体积与神经认知之间关系的异同。
我们展示了对244名研究对象(109例FES患者;63例BD患者,30例MDD患者和42例HCs)进行的皮质下体积和神经认知分析结果。使用FreeSurfer软件,自动分割并分析了16个选定皮质下结构的体积,以研究其与精神分裂症认知改善测量与治疗研究(MATRICS)认知共识电池(MCCB)中七项神经认知测试结果之间的关系。
与HCs相比,FES和BD患者左侧侧脑室体积增大,FES患者双侧海马体和杏仁核体积减小,BD和MDD患者双侧杏仁核体积减小,且FES和BD患者双侧杏仁核体积均低于MDD患者;FES、BD和MDD患者分别存在七个认知维度、五个认知维度和两个认知维度的损害;FES和BD患者的皮质下体积与神经认知之间存在显著关系,而MDD和HCs患者则不存在;除年龄和受教育年限外,一些皮质下体积可预测神经认知表现的差异。
不同程度的皮质下体积减小可能导致这三种精神疾病在认知损害方面存在差异。