Wu Mon-Ju, Passos Ives Cavalcante, Bauer Isabelle E, Lavagnino Luca, Cao Bo, Zunta-Soares Giovana B, Kapczinski Flávio, Mwangi Benson, Soares Jair C
UT Center of Excellence on Mood Disorder, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, The University of Texas Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
UT Center of Excellence on Mood Disorder, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, The University of Texas Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA; Bipolar Disorder Program and Laboratory of Molecular Psychiatry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
J Affect Disord. 2016 Mar 1;192:219-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.12.053. Epub 2015 Dec 30.
Previous studies have reported that patients with bipolar disorder (BD) present with cognitive impairments during mood episodes as well as euthymic phase. However, it is still unknown whether reported neurocognitive abnormalities can objectively identify individual BD patients from healthy controls (HC).
A total of 21 euthymic BD patients and 21 demographically matched HC were included in the current study. Participants performed the computerized Cambridge Neurocognitive Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) to assess cognitive performance. The least absolute shrinkage selection operator (LASSO) machine learning algorithm was implemented to identify neurocognitive signatures to distinguish individual BD patients from HC.
The LASSO machine learning algorithm identified individual BD patients from HC with an accuracy of 71%, area under receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.7143 and significant at p=0.0053. The LASSO algorithm assigned individual subjects with a probability score (0-healthy, 1-patient). Patients with rapid cycling (RC) were assigned increased probability scores as compared to patients without RC. A multivariate pattern of neurocognitive abnormalities comprising of affective Go/No-go and the Cambridge gambling task was relevant in distinguishing individual patients from HC.
Our study sample was small as we only considered euthymic BD patients and demographically matched HC.
Neurocognitive abnormalities can distinguish individual euthymic BD patients from HC with relatively high accuracy. In addition, patients with RC had more cognitive impairments compared to patients without RC. The predictive neurocognitive signature identified in the current study can potentially be used to provide individualized clinical inferences on BD patients.
既往研究报道,双相情感障碍(BD)患者在情绪发作期以及心境正常期均存在认知障碍。然而,所报道的神经认知异常是否能够客观地将BD患者个体与健康对照(HC)区分开来仍不清楚。
本研究共纳入21例心境正常的BD患者和21例人口统计学匹配的HC。参与者进行了计算机化的剑桥神经认知测试自动成套测验(CANTAB)以评估认知表现。采用最小绝对收缩选择算子(LASSO)机器学习算法来识别神经认知特征,以区分BD患者个体与HC。
LASSO机器学习算法区分BD患者个体与HC的准确率为71%,受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.7143,p=0.0053时具有显著性。LASSO算法为个体受试者分配一个概率分数(0-健康,1-患者)。与非快速循环(RC)患者相比,快速循环(RC)患者被分配的概率分数更高。由情感Go/No-go和剑桥赌博任务组成的神经认知异常多变量模式与区分患者个体与HC相关。
我们的研究样本较小,因为我们仅考虑了心境正常的BD患者和人口统计学匹配的HC。
神经认知异常能够以相对较高的准确率区分心境正常的BD患者个体与HC。此外,与非RC患者相比,RC患者存在更多的认知障碍。本研究中确定的预测性神经认知特征可能潜在地用于为BD患者提供个体化的临床推断。