Suppr超能文献

步骤、中等到剧烈的身体活动和心血管代谢特征。

Steps, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, and cardiometabolic profiles.

机构信息

MRC Epidemiology Unit, Institute of Metabolic Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Department of Geography, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.

Department of Geography, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

Prev Med. 2018 Feb;107:69-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.11.007. Epub 2017 Nov 7.

Abstract

The relative benefits of meeting the current moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA) and active step count recommendations are unknown. Using robust linear regressions, we compared cardiometabolic marker differences (blood pressure, lipid levels, Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR), hemoglobin A1C, C-reactive protein (CRP), and body mass index (BMI)) across MVPA (150min/week) and step (10,000 steps/day) thresholds and between step categories (low active: 5000 to 7499, somewhat active: 7500 to 9999, and active: ≥10,000 steps/day vs. inactive: <5000 steps/day) in approximately 6000 Canadian adults (41.5years, SD 14.9). Differences across MVPA and step thresholds were similar but additional benefits were observed for BMI and A1C for the MVPA target (i.e., above vs. below 150min/week MVPA: -1.02kg/m (95% Confidence Interval [CI] -1.25 to -0.80) and -0.04% (95% CI -0.06 to -0.02); above vs. below ≥10,000 steps/day: -0.40kg/m (95% CI -0.63 to -0.16) and 0.01% (95% CI -0.01 to 0.03)). In terms of steps categories, the greatest incremental improvement was achieved at the somewhat active threshold (e.g., somewhat active vs. inactive: -0.90kg/m, 95% CI -1.28 to -0.53; low active vs. inactive: -0.36kg/m, 95% CI -0.73 to 0.02). Additional benefits beyond the 10,000 step/day threshold were limited (e.g., -0.93kg/m, 95% CI -1.30 to -0.57). Given that most benefits to markers of cardiometabolic health were at the ≥7500 step/day threshold and that there was some additional benefit across the 150min/week MVPA threshold compared to a 10,000 steps/day threshold, we suggest aiming for ≥7500 steps/day and then advancing to a 150min/MVPA goal.

摘要

对于达到当前的中等至剧烈强度体力活动(MVPA)和活跃步数推荐的相对益处尚不清楚。我们使用稳健的线性回归,比较了心血管代谢标志物的差异(血压、血脂水平、稳态模型评估的胰岛素抵抗(HOMA-IR)、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1C)、C 反应蛋白(CRP)和体重指数(BMI)),这些差异横跨 MVPA(每周 150 分钟)和步数(每天 10000 步)阈值以及步数类别(低活跃:5000 至 7499 步、有些活跃:7500 至 9999 步和活跃:≥10000 步/天与不活跃:<5000 步/天),大约有 6000 名加拿大成年人(41.5 岁,SD 14.9)参与了研究。MVPA 和步数阈值之间的差异相似,但对于 MVPA 目标,还观察到 BMI 和 A1C 的额外益处(即,每周 150 分钟 MVPA 以上 vs. 以下:-1.02kg/m(95%置信区间[CI] -1.25 至 -0.80)和-0.04%(95%CI -0.06 至 -0.02);每天 10000 步以上 vs. 以下:-0.40kg/m(95%CI -0.63 至 -0.16)和 0.01%(95%CI -0.01 至 0.03))。就步数类别而言,在有些活跃的阈值上取得了最大的增量改善(例如,有些活跃 vs. 不活跃:-0.90kg/m,95%CI -1.28 至 -0.53;低活跃 vs. 不活跃:-0.36kg/m,95%CI -0.73 至 0.02)。超过 10000 步/天阈值的额外益处有限(例如,-0.93kg/m,95%CI -1.30 至 -0.57)。鉴于大多数对心血管代谢健康标志物的益处都在≥7500 步/天的阈值上,并且与 10000 步/天的阈值相比,MVPA 每周 150 分钟的阈值上还有一些额外的益处,因此我们建议达到≥7500 步/天,然后再提高到 150 分钟/MVPA 目标。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
Physical activity-time to take it seriously and regularly.体育活动——是时候认真且规律地对待它了。
Lancet. 2016 Sep 24;388(10051):1254-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31070-4. Epub 2016 Jul 28.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验