Suppr超能文献

体格检查技术能否辅助慢性疲劳综合征/肌痛性脑脊髓炎患者的诊断?一项诊断准确性研究。

Can physical assessment techniques aid diagnosis in people with chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis? A diagnostic accuracy study.

作者信息

Hives Lucy, Bradley Alice, Richards Jim, Sutton Chris, Selfe James, Basu Bhaskar, Maguire Kerry, Sumner Gail, Gaber Tarek, Mukherjee Annice, Perrin Raymond N

机构信息

School of Dentistry, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.

Department of Neurophysiology, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 13;7(11):e017521. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017521.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess five physical signs to see whether they can assist in the screening of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME) and potentially lead to quicker treatment.

METHODS

This was a diagnostic accuracy study with inter-rater agreement assessment. Participants recruited from two National Health Service hospitals, local CFS/ME support groups and the community were examined by three practitioners on the same day in a randomised order. Two allied health professionals (AHPs) performed independent examinations of physical signs including: postural/mechanical disturbances of the thoracic spine, breast varicosities, tender Perrin's point, tender coeliac plexus and dampened cranial flow. A physician conducted a standard clinical neurological and rheumatological assessment while looking for patterns of illness behaviour. Each examination lasted approximately 20 min.

RESULTS

Ninety-four participants were assessed, 52 patients with CFS/ME and 42 non-CFS/ME controls, aged 18-60. Cohen's kappa revealed that agreement between the AHPs was substantial for presence of the tender coeliac plexus (κ=0.65, p<0.001) and moderate for postural/mechanical disturbance of the thoracic spine (κ=0.57, p<0.001) and Perrin's point (κ=0.56, p<0.001). A McNemar's test found no statistically significant bias in the diagnosis by the experienced AHP relative to actual diagnosis (p=1.0) and a marginally non-significant bias by the newly trained AHP (p=0.052). There was, however, a significant bias in the diagnosis made by the physician relative to actual diagnosis (p<0.001), indicating poor diagnostic utility of the clinical neurological and rheumatological assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

Using the physical signs appears to improve the accuracy of identifying people with CFS/ME and shows agreement with current diagnostic techniques. However, the present study concludes that only two of these may be needed. Examining for physical signs is both quick and simple for the AHP and may be used as an efficient screening tool for CFS/ME. This is a small single-centre study, and therefore, further validation in other centres and larger populations is needed.

摘要

目的

评估五项体征,以确定它们是否有助于慢性疲劳综合征/肌痛性脑脊髓炎(CFS/ME)患者的筛查,并可能带来更快的治疗。

方法

这是一项带有评分者间一致性评估的诊断准确性研究。从两家国民健康服务医院、当地CFS/ME支持小组和社区招募的参与者,由三名从业者在同一天按随机顺序进行检查。两名专职医疗人员(AHP)对体征进行独立检查,包括:胸椎的姿势/机械性紊乱、乳房静脉曲张、佩兰点压痛、腹腔丛压痛和颅血流减弱。一名医生进行标准的临床神经学和风湿病学评估,同时寻找疾病行为模式。每次检查持续约20分钟。

结果

对94名参与者进行了评估,其中52名CFS/ME患者和42名非CFS/ME对照者,年龄在18至60岁之间。科恩kappa系数显示,AHP之间对于腹腔丛压痛的存在一致性较高(κ=0.65,p<0.001),对于胸椎姿势/机械性紊乱(κ=0.57,p<0.001)和佩兰点(κ=0.56,p<0.001)的一致性为中等。麦克尼马尔检验发现,经验丰富的AHP诊断相对于实际诊断无统计学显著偏差(p=1.0),新培训的AHP有轻微非显著偏差(p=0.052)。然而,医生的诊断相对于实际诊断存在显著偏差(p<0.001),表明临床神经学和风湿病学评估的诊断效用较差。

结论

使用这些体征似乎可以提高识别CFS/ME患者的准确性,并与当前诊断技术具有一致性。然而,本研究得出结论,可能仅需要其中两项体征。对于AHP来说,检查体征快速且简单,可作为CFS/ME的有效筛查工具。这是一项小型单中心研究,因此需要在其他中心和更大人群中进行进一步验证。

相似文献

4
Problems in defining post-exertional malaise.定义运动后不适的问题。
J Prev Interv Community. 2015;43(1):20-31. doi: 10.1080/10852352.2014.973239.

引用本文的文献

1
[S1 guideline long/post-COVID syndrome].[S1指南:长期新冠后综合征]
Urologie. 2024 Nov;63(11):1158-1161. doi: 10.1007/s00120-024-02373-9. Epub 2024 Jun 17.
6
Post COVID fatigue: Can we really ignore it?新冠后疲劳:我们真的能忽视它吗?
Indian J Tuberc. 2022 Apr;69(2):238-241. doi: 10.1016/j.ijtb.2021.06.012. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
7
COVID-19 Legacy.新冠疫情遗留问题。
South Med J. 2021 Dec;114(12):751-759. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001337.

本文引用的文献

1
Myalgic encephalomyelitis: International Consensus Criteria.慢性疲劳综合征:国际共识标准。
J Intern Med. 2011 Oct;270(4):327-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2011.02428.x. Epub 2011 Aug 22.
2
Chronic fatigue syndrome, the immune system and viral infection.慢性疲劳综合征、免疫系统与病毒感染。
Brain Behav Immun. 2012 Jan;26(1):24-31. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2011.06.016. Epub 2011 Jul 2.
4
Immunological aspects of chronic fatigue syndrome.慢性疲劳综合征的免疫学方面
Autoimmun Rev. 2009 Feb;8(4):287-91. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2008.08.003. Epub 2008 Sep 16.
8
Chronic fatigue syndrome: a review.慢性疲劳综合征:综述
Am J Psychiatry. 2003 Feb;160(2):221-36. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.2.221.
10
Chronic fatigue syndrome: an update.慢性疲劳综合征:最新进展
Sports Med. 2001;31(3):167-94. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200131030-00003.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验