Suppr超能文献

血液透析和腹膜透析患者肠道微生物组组成的结构和功能差异。

Structural and functional differences in gut microbiome composition in patients undergoing haemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

Division of Transplantation Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 15;7(1):15601. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-15650-9.

Abstract

Complications of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are critically related to inflammation. The gut microbiome is a key driver of inflammation. Since dialysis modalities may differently influence the gut microbiome, we aimed to compare the effects of haemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) on patients' gut microbiome composition and function. We therefore studied faecal microbiome composition and function as well as inflammation and gut permeability in 30 patients with ESRD (15 HD, 15 PD) and compared to 21 healthy controls. We found an increase in potentially pathogenic species and a decrease in beneficial species in patients on HD and to a lesser extend in patients on PD when compared to controls. These changes in taxonomic composition also resulted in differences in predicted metagenome functions of the faecal microbiome. In HD but not in PD, changes in microbiome composition were associated with an increase in c-reactive protein (CRP) but not with intestinal inflammation or gut permeability. In conclusion microbiome composition in ESRD differs from healthy controls but also between modes of dialysis. These differences are associated with systemic inflammation and cannot completely be explained by dialysis vintage. The mode of renal replacement therapy seems to be an important driver of dysbiosis in ESRD.

摘要

终末期肾病(ESRD)的并发症与炎症密切相关。肠道微生物组是炎症的关键驱动因素。由于透析方式可能会对肠道微生物组产生不同的影响,我们旨在比较血液透析(HD)和腹膜透析(PD)对患者肠道微生物组组成和功能的影响。因此,我们研究了 30 名 ESRD 患者(15 名 HD,15 名 PD)的粪便微生物组组成和功能以及炎症和肠道通透性,并与 21 名健康对照进行了比较。与对照组相比,我们发现 HD 组和 PD 组中潜在致病物种的数量增加,有益物种的数量减少。这种分类组成的变化也导致了粪便微生物组预测宏基因组功能的差异。在 HD 组中,但不是在 PD 组中,微生物组组成的变化与 C 反应蛋白(CRP)的增加有关,但与肠道炎症或肠道通透性无关。总之,ESRD 患者的微生物组组成与健康对照组不同,而且在不同的透析模式之间也不同。这些差异与全身炎症有关,不能完全用透析时间来解释。肾脏替代治疗的方式似乎是 ESRD 中菌群失调的一个重要驱动因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d44/5688134/8a1601e6a0b7/41598_2017_15650_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验