• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重新构建临床研究中的同意书:基于功能的方法。

Reframing Consent for Clinical Research: A Function-Based Approach.

机构信息

a Emory University School of Medicine.

b Harvard University T H Chan School of Public Health.

出版信息

Am J Bioeth. 2017 Dec;17(12):3-11. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2017.1388448.

DOI:10.1080/15265161.2017.1388448
PMID:29148951
Abstract

Although informed consent is important in clinical research, questions persist regarding when it is necessary, what it requires, and how it should be obtained. The standard view in research ethics is that the function of informed consent is to respect individual autonomy. However, consent processes are multidimensional and serve other ethical functions as well. These functions deserve particular attention when barriers to consent exist. We argue that consent serves seven ethically important and conceptually distinct functions. The first four functions pertain principally to individual participants: (1) providing transparency; (2) allowing control and authorization; (3) promoting concordance with participants' values; and (4) protecting and promoting welfare interests. Three other functions are systemic or policy focused: (5) promoting trust; (6) satisfying regulatory requirements; and (7) promoting integrity in research. Reframing consent around these functions can guide approaches to consent that are context sensitive and that maximize achievable goals.

摘要

虽然知情同意在临床研究中很重要,但对于何时需要知情同意、需要什么内容以及如何获得知情同意,仍存在一些疑问。研究伦理的标准观点认为,知情同意的作用是尊重个人自主权。然而,同意过程是多维度的,也具有其他伦理功能。当存在同意障碍时,这些功能值得特别关注。我们认为,同意有七个具有重要伦理意义且概念上不同的功能。前四个功能主要涉及个体参与者:(1)提供透明度;(2)允许控制和授权;(3)促进与参与者价值观的一致性;(4)保护和促进福利利益。另外三个功能是系统性或政策重点:(5)促进信任;(6)满足监管要求;(7)促进研究的完整性。围绕这些功能重新构建同意,可以指导针对具体情况的同意方法,使可实现的目标最大化。

相似文献

1
Reframing Consent for Clinical Research: A Function-Based Approach.重新构建临床研究中的同意书:基于功能的方法。
Am J Bioeth. 2017 Dec;17(12):3-11. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2017.1388448.
2
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明:临床研究监督
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2377-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.026. Epub 2003 Apr 29.
3
Beyond informed consent: the therapeutic misconception and trust.超越知情同意:治疗性误解与信任。
J Med Ethics. 2008 Mar;34(3):202-5. doi: 10.1136/jme.2006.019406.
4
Is Consent Based on Trust Morally Inferior to Consent Based on Information?基于信任的同意在道德上是否低于基于信息的同意?
Bioethics. 2017 Jul;31(6):432-442. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12342. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
5
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
6
Rethinking research ethics.反思研究伦理。
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Oct;10(10):19-36. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2010.519233.
7
The ethics of informed consent: an overview.知情同意的伦理:概述
Psychiatr J Univ Ott. 1989 Sep;14(3):435-8.
8
Bioethics committees and examining consent within the patient-physician relationship in Turkey.土耳其的生物伦理委员会与医患关系中的知情同意审查
Med Law. 2010 Sep;29(3):403-18.
9
Autonomy and informed consent: a mistaken association?自主性与知情同意:一种错误的关联?
Med Health Care Philos. 2007 Sep;10(3):253-64. doi: 10.1007/s11019-007-9048-4. Epub 2007 Mar 1.
10
The value of respect in human research ethics: a conceptual analysis and a practical guide.尊重在人类研究伦理中的价值:概念分析与实践指南。
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2014 Sep-Dec;32(3-4):232-53. doi: 10.1007/s40592-014-0016-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Towards better enrollment decision-making for perinatal clinical research: Reconsidering recruitment and consent processes to support family values and preferences.迈向更好的围产期临床研究入组决策:重新审视招募和同意程序以支持家庭价值观和偏好。
Semin Perinatol. 2025 Apr;49(3):152055. doi: 10.1016/j.semperi.2025.152055. Epub 2025 May 21.
2
Accelerating implementation of visual key information to improve informed consent in research: a single-institution feasibility study and implementation testing.加速视觉关键信息的实施以改善研究中的知情同意:一项单机构可行性研究与实施测试
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 18;15(3):e092185. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092185.
3
Ethical issues in implementation science: perspectives from a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute workshop.
实施科学中的伦理问题:国家心肺血液研究所研讨会的观点。
Implement Sci. 2024 Nov 19;19(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s13012-024-01403-6.
4
Meaningful and Successful Ethical Enactments: A Proposal from Deliberative Wisdom Theory.有意义且成功的道德实践:来自慎思智慧理论的一项提议
J Bioeth Inq. 2024 Nov 5. doi: 10.1007/s11673-024-10391-7.
5
Individualized clinical decisions within standard-of-care pragmatic clinical trials: Implications for consent.标准治疗实用临床试验中的个体化临床决策:对知情同意的影响。
Clin Trials. 2024 Dec;21(6):659-665. doi: 10.1177/17407745241266155. Epub 2024 Aug 15.
6
Pragmatic Clinical Trials: The Ethics of Conducting Research in the Real World.实用临床试验:在现实世界中开展研究的伦理问题。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2024 Sep;99(9):1369-1373. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2024.05.001. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
7
The ethical value of consulting community members in non-emergency trials conducted with waivers of informed consent for research.在为研究而放弃知情同意的非紧急试验中咨询社区成员的伦理价值。
Clin Trials. 2025 Feb;22(1):100-108. doi: 10.1177/17407745241259360. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
8
Living ethics: a stance and its implications in health ethics.生命伦理学:一种立场及其在健康伦理中的意义。
Med Health Care Philos. 2024 Jun;27(2):137-154. doi: 10.1007/s11019-024-10197-9. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
9
Personalized Trial Ethics and Institutional Review Board Submissions.个性化试验伦理与机构审查委员会提交材料
Harv Data Sci Rev. 2022;2022(Spec Iss 3). doi: 10.1162/99608f92.2ded0fc5. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
10
Informed Consent among Clinical Trial Participants with Different Cancer Diagnoses.不同癌症诊断的临床试验参与者的知情同意。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2024 Jul-Sep;15(3):165-177. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2023.2262992. Epub 2023 Nov 3.