Instituto de Química, Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho"- UNESP, R. Prof. Francisco Degni 55, P.O. Box 355, 14801-970, Araraquara, SP, Brazil.
Instituto de Química de São Carlos, Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Trabalhador São-carlense, 400, 13566-590, São Carlos, SP, Brazil.
Anal Chim Acta. 2018 Jan 2;997:16-23. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2017.10.018. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
In this paper, we describe a validated paper-based microfluidic analytical device for the simultaneous quantification of two important biomarkers of renal function in urine. This paper platform provides an inexpensive, simple, and easy to use colorimetric method for the quantification of creatinine (CRN) and uric acid (UA) in urine samples. The microfluidic paper-based analytical device (μPAD) consists of a main channel with three identical arms, each containing a circular testing zone and a circular uptake zone. Creatinine detection is based on the Jaffé reaction, in which CRN reacts with picrate to form an orange-red product. Uric acid quantification is based on the reduction of Fe to Fe by UA, which is detected in a colorimetric reaction using 1,10-phenanthroline. Under optimum conditions, obtained through chemometrics, the concentrations of the analytes showed good linear correlations with the effective intensities, and the method presented satisfactory repeatability. The limits of detection and the linear ranges, respectively, were 15.7 mg L and 50-600 mg L for CRN and 16.5 mg L and 50-500 mg L for UA. There were no statistically significant differences between the results obtained using the μPAD and a chromatographic comparative method (Student's t-test at 95% confidence level).
本文介绍了一种经过验证的基于纸质的微流控分析装置,用于同时定量尿液中两种重要的肾功能生物标志物。该纸基平台提供了一种经济、简单且易于使用的比色法,用于定量尿液样本中的肌酐 (CRN) 和尿酸 (UA)。微流控纸质分析装置 (μPAD) 由一个主通道组成,该通道有三个相同的分支,每个分支都包含一个圆形测试区和一个圆形吸收区。肌酐检测基于 Jaffé 反应,其中 CRN 与苦味酸反应形成橙红色产物。尿酸定量是基于 UA 将 Fe 还原为 Fe,这在使用 1,10-菲啰啉的比色反应中进行检测。在通过化学计量学获得的最佳条件下,分析物的浓度与有效强度呈良好的线性相关,该方法表现出令人满意的重复性。分别为 CRN 的 15.7 mg/L 和 50-600 mg/L 以及 UA 的 16.5 mg/L 和 50-500 mg/L。使用 μPAD 和色谱比较方法(置信水平为 95%的学生 t 检验)获得的结果之间没有统计学上的显著差异。