Human Nutrition Unit, School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland 1010, New Zealand.
High-Value Nutrition National Science Challenge, Auckland 1010, New Zealand.
Nutrients. 2017 Nov 22;9(11):1273. doi: 10.3390/nu9111273.
Prediabetes can be defined by the presence of impaired fasting glucose (IFG) and/or impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), or glycated haemoglobin (Hb) to identify individuals at increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes (T2D). The World Health Organization (WHO, 1999) and the American Diabetes Association (ADA, 2003) utilise different cut-off values for IFG (WHO: 6.1-6.9 mmol/L; ADA: 5.6-6.9 mmol/L) but the same cut-off values for IGT (7.8-11.0 mmol/L). This review investigates whether there are differences in prevalence of IFG, IGT, and combined IFG&IGT between ethnicities, in particular Asian Chinese and European Caucasians. In total, we identified 19 studies using the WHO classification, for which the average proportional prevalence for isolated (i)-IFG, i-IGT, and combined IFG&IGT were 43.9%, 41.0%, and 13.5%, respectively, for Caucasian and 29.2%, 49.4%, and 18.2%, respectively, for Asian. For the 14 studies using ADA classification, the average proportional i-IFG, i-IGT, and combined IFG&IGT prevalences were 58.0%, 20.3%, and 19.8%, respectively, for Caucasian; 48.1%, 27.7%, and 20.5%, respectively, for Asian. Whilst not statistically different, there may be clinically relevant differences in the two populations, with our observations for both classifications indicating that prevalence of i-IFG is higher in Caucasian cohorts whilst i-IGT and combined IFG&IGT are both higher in Asian cohorts.
糖尿病前期可通过空腹血糖受损(IFG)和/或葡萄糖耐量受损(IGT)以及糖化血红蛋白(Hb)来定义,以识别出发生 2 型糖尿病(T2D)风险增加的个体。世界卫生组织(WHO,1999 年)和美国糖尿病协会(ADA,2003 年)使用不同的 IFG 截断值(WHO:6.1-6.9mmol/L;ADA:5.6-6.9mmol/L),但 IGT 的截断值相同(7.8-11.0mmol/L)。本综述研究了在不同种族(特别是亚洲华裔和欧洲白种人)之间,IFG、IGT 和 IFG&IGT 联合的患病率是否存在差异。我们共确定了 19 项使用 WHO 分类的研究,对于白人,孤立性(i)-IFG、i-IGT 和 IFG&IGT 的平均比例患病率分别为 43.9%、41.0%和 13.5%,而对于亚洲人则分别为 29.2%、49.4%和 18.2%。对于使用 ADA 分类的 14 项研究,白人的 i-IFG、i-IGT 和 IFG&IGT 的平均比例患病率分别为 58.0%、20.3%和 19.8%;亚洲人分别为 48.1%、27.7%和 20.5%。虽然没有统计学差异,但这两个人群可能存在临床相关的差异,我们对两种分类的观察结果表明,i-IFG 在白人群体中的患病率较高,而 i-IGT 和 IFG&IGT 在亚洲人群中均较高。