School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, AUSTRALIA.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018 Mar;50(3):516-524. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001453.
According to cross-sectional and acute experimental evidence, reducing sitting time should improve cardiometabolic health risk biomarkers. Furthermore, the improvements obtained may depend on whether sitting is replaced with standing or ambulatory activities. Based on data from the Stand Up Victoria multicomponent workplace intervention, we examined this issue using compositional data analysis-a method that can examine and compare all activity changes simultaneously.
Participants receiving the intervention (n = 136 ≥ 0.6 full-time equivalent desk-based workers, 65% women, mean ± SD age = 44.6 ± 9.1 yr from seven worksites) were asked to improve whole-of-day activity by standing up, sitting less, and moving more. Their changes in the composition of daily waking hours (activPAL-assessed sitting, standing, and stepping) were quantified then tested for associations with concurrent changes in cardiometabolic risk (CMR) scores and 14 biomarkers concerning body composition, glucose, insulin, and lipid metabolism. Analyses were by mixed models, accounting for clustering (3 months, n = 105-120; 12 months, n = 80-97).
Sitting reduction was significantly (P < 0.05) associated only with lower systolic blood pressure at 3 months, and with CMR scores, weight, body fat, waist circumference, diastolic blood pressure, and fasting triglycerides, total/HDL cholesterol, and insulin at 12 months. Significant differences between standing and stepping were only observed for systolic blood pressure and insulin; both favored stepping. However, replacing sitting with standing was significantly associated only with improvements in CMR scores, whereas replacing sitting with stepping was significantly associated with CMR scores and six biomarkers.
Improvements in several cardiometabolic health risk biomarkers were significantly associated with sitting reductions that occurred in a workplace intervention. The greatest degree and/or widest range of cardiometabolic benefits appeared to occur with long-term changes, and when increasing ambulatory activities.
ACTRN1211000742976.
根据横断面和急性实验证据,减少久坐时间应能改善心血管代谢健康风险生物标志物。此外,所获得的改善可能取决于久坐时间是被站立或活动取代。基于来自维多利亚站立工作场所多组分干预的研究数据,我们使用成分数据分析方法(一种可以同时检查和比较所有活动变化的方法)来研究这个问题。
接受干预的参与者(n=136≥0.6 名全职等效的办公桌工作人员,65%为女性,来自七个工作场所,平均年龄为 44.6±9.1 岁)被要求通过站立、减少久坐和增加活动来改善全天的活动量。他们的日常清醒时间(activPAL 评估的坐姿、站立和行走)组成的变化被量化,然后与心血管代谢风险(CMR)评分和 14 个与身体成分、葡萄糖、胰岛素和脂质代谢有关的生物标志物的变化进行关联测试。分析采用混合模型,考虑了聚类因素(3 个月,n=105-120;12 个月,n=80-97)。
仅在 3 个月时,减少坐姿与收缩压降低显著相关(P<0.05),而在 12 个月时,与 CMR 评分、体重、体脂、腰围、舒张压和空腹甘油三酯、总胆固醇/高密度脂蛋白胆固醇和胰岛素均显著相关。站立和行走之间仅观察到收缩压和胰岛素的显著差异,两者都有利于行走。然而,用站立取代坐姿仅与 CMR 评分的改善显著相关,而用行走取代坐姿与 CMR 评分和六个生物标志物均显著相关。
在一项工作场所干预中,几种心血管代谢健康风险生物标志物的改善与发生的坐姿减少显著相关。在长期变化和增加活动时,似乎能获得最大程度和/或最广泛的心血管代谢益处。
ACTRN1211000742976。