• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新泽西州清醒检查站及其他地方酒驾执法项目对交通安全的影响。

Traffic safety effects of sobriety checkpoints and other local DWI programs in New Jersey.

作者信息

Levy D, Shea D, Asch P

机构信息

Department of Economics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08903.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 1989 Mar;79(3):291-3. doi: 10.2105/ajph.79.3.291.

DOI:10.2105/ajph.79.3.291
PMID:2916713
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1349549/
Abstract

We examined the efficacy of three Driving While Intoxicated (DWI) programs in New Jersey from 1980 through 1985, using covariance analysis of county data. Road blocks, the major component of the Strike Force program, were associated with a drop of 10-15 per cent in the single vehicle nighttime crash rate and showed a relatively stable effect over time. DWI Task Force, an education program, was associated with a 6-10 per cent total decline in the crash rate and declining impact over time. SOBER, another education program, was associated with a small effect in the first year and little or no effect thereafter.

摘要

我们运用县数据的协方差分析,研究了1980年至1985年新泽西州的三种酒后驾车(DWI)项目的成效。路障是打击行动项目的主要组成部分,它使单车夜间撞车率下降了10%至15%,且随着时间推移效果相对稳定。酒后驾车特别工作组是一个教育项目,它使撞车率总体下降了6%至10%,且随着时间推移影响逐渐减弱。清醒项目是另一个教育项目,它在第一年有较小影响,之后影响甚微或没有影响。

相似文献

1
Traffic safety effects of sobriety checkpoints and other local DWI programs in New Jersey.新泽西州清醒检查站及其他地方酒驾执法项目对交通安全的影响。
Am J Public Health. 1989 Mar;79(3):291-3. doi: 10.2105/ajph.79.3.291.
2
Primary and secondary prevention of drink driving by the use of alcolock device and program: Swedish experiences.使用酒精锁装置和项目对酒后驾车进行一级和二级预防:瑞典的经验。
Accid Anal Prev. 2005 Nov;37(6):1145-52. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2005.06.020. Epub 2005 Aug 1.
3
Publicized sobriety checkpoint programs: a community guide systematic review.公开的清醒检查站计划:社区指南系统评价
Am J Prev Med. 2014 May;46(5):529-39. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.01.018.
4
Costs and benefits of a community sobriety checkpoint program.社区清醒检查站项目的成本与效益
J Stud Alcohol. 1998 Jul;59(4):462-8. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1998.59.462.
5
Effectiveness of multicomponent programs with community mobilization for reducing alcohol-impaired driving.采用社区动员的多组分项目在减少酒后驾车方面的有效性。
Am J Prev Med. 2009 Oct;37(4):360-71. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.07.005.
6
A 0.05 BAC limit in the United States: an important challenge for policy, health and safety.美国0.05的血液酒精浓度限制:对政策、健康和安全的一项重大挑战。
Addiction. 2014 Jun;109(6):875. doi: 10.1111/add.12421.
7
Deterring the drinking driver: the Stockton experience.威慑酒后驾车者:斯托克顿的经验
Accid Anal Prev. 1987 Apr;19(2):81-90. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(87)90027-3.
8
A note on the effectiveness of the house-arrest alternative for motivating DWI offenders to install ignition interlocks.关于以软禁替代方式激励 DWI 违法者安装点火联锁装置的有效性的说明。
J Safety Res. 2009;40(6):437-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2009.08.004. Epub 2009 Oct 17.
9
Towards a national model for managing impaired driving offenders.迈向全国性的酒驾罪犯管理模式。
Addiction. 2011 Jul;106(7):1221-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03339.x. Epub 2011 Mar 11.
10
Preventing alcohol-impaired driving through community self-regulation training.通过社区自我监管培训预防酒后驾车。
Am J Public Health. 1989 Mar;79(3):287-90. doi: 10.2105/ajph.79.3.287.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of road safety interventions: An evidence and gap map.道路安全干预措施的有效性:证据与差距图。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 3;20(1):e1367. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1367. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
Determining a dosage threshold of drink-driving enforcement operations: A systematic review.确定酒驾执法行动的剂量阈值:系统评价。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2022 Nov;41(7):1610-1620. doi: 10.1111/dar.13519. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
3
Can progress in reducing alcohol-impaired driving fatalities be resumed? Results of a workshop sponsored by the Transportation Research Board, Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Transportation Committee (ANB50).能否恢复在减少酒精影响下驾驶导致的死亡事故方面取得的进展?交通研究委员会酒精、其他药物与交通委员会(ANB50)主办的一次研讨会的结果。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2016 Nov 16;17(8):771-81. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2016.1157592. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
4
Trends in alcohol-related traffic risk behaviors among college students.大学生中与酒精相关的交通危险行为趋势。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2010 Aug;34(8):1472-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2010.01232.x. Epub 2010 Jun 1.
5
Evaluation of seven publicized enforcement demonstration programs to reduce impaired driving: Georgia, Louisiana, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, Indiana, and Michigan.对七个旨在减少酒驾的公开执法示范项目的评估:佐治亚州、路易斯安那州、宾夕法尼亚州、田纳西州、得克萨斯州、印第安纳州和密歇根州。
Ann Adv Automot Med. 2008 Oct;52:23-38.
6
Evaluation of four state impaired driving enforcement demonstration programs: Georgia, Tennessee, Pennsylvania and Louisiana.对四个州的酒驾执法示范项目的评估:佐治亚州、田纳西州、宾夕法尼亚州和路易斯安那州。
Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med. 2005;49:311-26.
7
Drinking histories of fatally injured drivers.致命伤驾驶员的饮酒史。
Inj Prev. 2002 Sep;8(3):221-6. doi: 10.1136/ip.8.3.221.
8
Reducing alcohol-impaired driving in Massachusetts: the Saving Lives Program.减少马萨诸塞州的酒驾行为:拯救生命计划。
Am J Public Health. 1996 Jun;86(6):791-7. doi: 10.2105/ajph.86.6.791.
9
Evaluating community interventions to reduce drunken driving.评估减少酒后驾车的社区干预措施。
Am J Public Health. 1989 Mar;79(3):271. doi: 10.2105/ajph.79.3.271.

本文引用的文献

1
Using roadblocks to reduce drunk driving: public health or law and order?设置路障以减少酒后驾车:是公共卫生问题还是法律与秩序问题?
Am J Public Health. 1984 Sep;74(9):1028-30. doi: 10.2105/ajph.74.9.1028.
2
The relationships among driving while impaired charges, police drinking-driving roadcheck activity, media coverage and alcohol-related casualty traffic accidents.酒后驾车指控、警方酒驾路检活动、媒体报道与酒精相关伤亡交通事故之间的关系。
Accid Anal Prev. 1985 Dec;17(6):467-74. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(85)90042-9.