Suppr超能文献

烟草行业试图依据1990年的《美国残疾人法案》将吸烟界定为一种“残疾”。

Tobacco industry attempts to frame smoking as a 'disability' under the 1990 Americans with Disabilities Act.

作者信息

van der Eijk Yvette, Glantz Stanton A

机构信息

Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.

Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies and Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Nov 27;12(11):e0188188. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188188. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

Using the Truth Tobacco Industry Documents Library and Congressional records, we examined the tobacco industry's involvement with the 1990 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). During legislative drafting of the ADA (1989-1990), the Tobacco Institute, the tobacco industry's lobbying and public relations arm at the time, worked with industry lawyers and civil rights groups to include smoking in the ADA's definition of "disability." Focus was on smoking as a perceived rather than actual disability so that tobacco companies could maintain that smoking is not addictive. Language that would have explicitly excluded smoking from ADA coverage was weakened or omitted. Tobacco Institute lawyers did not think the argument that smokers are "disabled" would convince the courts, so in the two years after the ADA was signed into law, the Tobacco Institute paid a lawyer to conduct media tours, seminars, and write articles to convince employers that hiring only non-smokers would violate the ADA. The ultimate goal of these activities was to deter employers from promoting a healthy, tobacco-free workforce and, more broadly, to promote the social acceptability of smoking. Employers and policy makers need to be aware that tobacco use is not protected by the ADA and should not be misled by tobacco industry efforts to insinuate otherwise.

摘要

利用真相烟草行业文件库和国会记录,我们研究了烟草行业在1990年《美国残疾人法案》(ADA)中的参与情况。在ADA的立法起草阶段(1989 - 1990年),当时烟草行业的游说和公关机构烟草研究所,与行业律师及民权组织合作,将吸烟纳入ADA中“残疾”的定义。重点在于将吸烟视为一种被认知的而非实际的残疾,以便烟草公司能够坚称吸烟并非成瘾行为。原本会明确将吸烟排除在ADA覆盖范围之外的措辞被弱化或省略。烟草研究所的律师认为吸烟者“残疾”这一论点无法说服法院,所以在ADA签署成为法律后的两年里,烟草研究所聘请一名律师进行媒体宣传、举办研讨会并撰写文章,以说服雇主们,仅雇佣不吸烟者将违反ADA。这些活动的最终目的是阻止雇主推动建立一个健康、无烟的工作场所,更广泛地说,是为了提升吸烟在社会上的可接受性。雇主和政策制定者需要意识到,烟草使用不受ADA保护,不应被烟草行业暗示相反情况的努力所误导。

相似文献

1
Tobacco industry attempts to frame smoking as a 'disability' under the 1990 Americans with Disabilities Act.
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 27;12(11):e0188188. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188188. eCollection 2017.
3
Lessons learned from the tobacco industry's efforts to prevent the passage of a workplace smoking regulation.
Am J Public Health. 2000 Dec;90(12):1926-30. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.12.1926.
4
The new battleground: California's experience with smoke-free bars.
Am J Public Health. 2001 Feb;91(2):245-52. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.2.245.
5
"A phony way to show sincerity, as we all well know": tobacco industry lobbying against tobacco control in Hong Kong.
Tob Control. 2004 Dec;13 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii13-21. doi: 10.1136/tc.2004.007641.
6
From legitimate consumers to public relations pawns: the tobacco industry and young Australians.
Tob Control. 2003 Dec;12 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):iii71-8. doi: 10.1136/tc.12.suppl_3.iii71.
7
Tobacco control in Namibia: the importance of government capacity, media coverage and industry interference.
Tob Control. 2014 Nov;23(6):518-23. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050725. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
8
Tobacco industry strategy to undermine tobacco control in Finland.
Tob Control. 2003 Dec;12(4):414-23. doi: 10.1136/tc.12.4.414.
9
When tobacco targets direct democracy.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2014 Jun;39(3):537-64. doi: 10.1215/03616878-2682603. Epub 2014 Mar 6.
10
Tobacco industry interference with tobacco control policies in Poland: legal aspects and industry practices.
Tob Control. 2016 Sep;25(5):521-6. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052582. Epub 2015 Sep 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Corporate coalitions and policy making in the European Union: how and why British American Tobacco promoted "Better Regulation".
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2015 Apr;40(2):325-72. doi: 10.1215/03616878-2882231. Epub 2015 Feb 2.
2
The importance of product definitions in US e-cigarette laws and regulations.
Tob Control. 2016 Apr;25(e1):e44-51. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051913. Epub 2014 Dec 14.
4
"They're going to die anyway": smoking shelters at veterans' facilities.
Am J Public Health. 2013 Apr;103(4):604-12. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301022. Epub 2013 Feb 14.
6
Tobacco documents research methodology.
Tob Control. 2011 May;20 Suppl 2(Suppl_2):ii8-11. doi: 10.1136/tc.2010.041921.
8
Political coalitions for mutual advantage: the case of the Tobacco Institute's Labor Management Committee.
Am J Public Health. 2005 Jun;95(6):985-93. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.052126.
9
Tobacco industry efforts to present ventilation as an alternative to smoke-free environments in North America.
Tob Control. 2004 Mar;13 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i41-7. doi: 10.1136/tc.2003.004101.
10
Tobacco industry allegations of "illegal lobbying" and state tobacco control.
Am J Public Health. 2001 Jan;91(1):62-7. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.1.62.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验