Tilburg University.
Erasmus Medisch Centrum Rotterdam.
Child Dev. 2018 Nov;89(6):2081-2090. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13002. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
Adolescents' secrecy is intertwined with perception of parents' behaviors as acts of privacy invasion. It is currently untested, however, how this transactional process operates at the within-person level-where these causal processes take place. Dutch adolescents (n = 244, M = 13.84, 38.50% boys) reported three times on perceived parental privacy invasion and secrecy. Cross-lagged panel models (CLPM) confirmed earlier findings. Privacy invasion predicted increased secrecy, but a reverse effect was found from increased secrecy to increased privacy invasion. Controlling for confounding positive group-level associations with a novel random intercept CLPM, negative within-person associations were found. Higher levels of secrecy predicted lower levels of privacy invasive behaviors at the within-person level. These opposing findings within- versus between-persons illustrate a Simpson's paradox.
青少年的隐私与他们对父母行为的看法是交织在一起的，认为父母的行为侵犯了他们的隐私。然而，目前还没有研究表明这种交易过程是如何在个体内部进行的，也就是这些因果过程发生的地方。荷兰青少年（n=244，M=13.84，男生占 38.50%）报告了三次感知到的父母侵犯隐私和隐瞒秘密的行为。交叉滞后面板模型（CLPM）证实了之前的发现。侵犯隐私行为预测了隐瞒行为的增加，但相反，从隐瞒行为的增加到侵犯隐私行为的增加也存在影响。通过控制新的随机截距 CLPM 与混杂的正群体水平关联，发现了个体内部的负相关。个体内部更高水平的隐瞒行为预测了更低水平的侵犯隐私行为。这种个体内与个体间的相反发现说明了辛普森悖论。
