McCafferty Sean, Levine Jason, Schwiegerling Jim, Enikov Eniko T
Intuor Technolgies, LLC, 6422 E. Speedway Blvd. Tucson, Suite 100, Tucson, AZ, 85710, USA.
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Arizona College of Medicine, 655 n alvernon, Tucson, AZ, 85710, USA.
BMC Ophthalmol. 2017 Nov 25;17(1):215. doi: 10.1186/s12886-017-0608-y.
Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) error relative to intracameral intraocular pressure (IOP) has not been examined comparatively in both human cadaver eyes and in live human eyes. Futhermore, correlations to biomechanical corneal properties and positional changes have not been examined directly to intracameral IOP and GAT IOP.
Intracameral IOP was measured via pressure transducer on fifty-eight (58) eyes undergoing cataract surgery and the IOP was modulated manometrically on each patient alternately to 10, 20, and 40 mmHg. IOP was measured using a Perkins tonometer in the supine position on 58 eyes and upright on a subset of 8 eyes. Twenty one (21) fresh human cadaver globes were Intracamerally IOP adjusted and measured via pressure transducer. Intracameral IOP ranged between 5 and 60 mmHg. IOP was measured in the upright position with a Goldmann Applanation Tonometer (GAT) and supine position with a Perkins tonometer. Central corneal thickness (CCT) was also measured.
The Goldmann-type tonometer error measured on live human eyes was 5.2 +/-1.6 mmHg lower than intracameral IOP in the upright position and 7.9 +/- 2.3 mmHg lower in the supine position (p < .05). CCT also indicated a sloped correlation to error (correlation coeff. = 0.18). Cadaver eye IOP measurements were 3.1+/-2.5 mmHg lower than intracameral IOP in the upright position and 5.4+/- 3.1 mmHg in the supine position (p < .05).
Goldmann IOP measures significantly lower than true intracameral IOP by approximately 3 mmHg in vitro and 5 mmHg in vivo. The Goldmann IOP error is increased an additional 2.8 mmHg lower in the supine position. CCT appears to significantly affect the error by up to 4 mmHg over the sample size.
尚未在人类尸体眼和活人眼中对与前房内眼压(IOP)相关的Goldmann压平眼压测量法(GAT)误差进行比较研究。此外,尚未直接研究与生物力学角膜特性和位置变化与前房内眼压和GAT眼压之间的相关性。
通过压力传感器对58只接受白内障手术的眼睛测量前房内眼压,并对每位患者交替进行压力调节,使眼压分别达到10、20和40 mmHg。使用Perkins眼压计在仰卧位对58只眼睛进行眼压测量,在8只眼睛的子集上进行直立位测量。对21只新鲜人类尸体眼球进行前房内眼压调节,并通过压力传感器进行测量。前房内眼压范围为5至60 mmHg。使用Goldmann压平眼压计(GAT)在直立位测量眼压,使用Perkins眼压计在仰卧位测量眼压。还测量了中央角膜厚度(CCT)。
在活人眼中测量的Goldmann型眼压计误差在直立位比前房内眼压低5.2±1.6 mmHg,在仰卧位低7.9±2.3 mmHg(p<0.05)。CCT也显示出与误差呈斜率相关性(相关系数=0.18)。尸体眼眼压测量值在直立位比前房内眼压低3.1±2.5 mmHg,在仰卧位低5.4±3.1 mmHg(p<0.05)。
Goldmann眼压测量值在体外比真实前房内眼压显著低约3 mmHg,在体内低5 mmHg。Goldmann眼压误差在仰卧位时再降低2.8 mmHg。在整个样本量范围内,CCT似乎对误差有显著影响,高达4 mmHg。