• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于医疗数据库的自动安全信号检测与优先级排序系统:一项试点研究。

An Automated System Combining Safety Signal Detection and Prioritization from Healthcare Databases: A Pilot Study.

机构信息

University of Bordeaux, Inserm, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, Pharmacoepidemiology Team, UMR 1219, 146 Rue Léo Saignat, BP 36, 33000, Bordeaux Cedex, France.

CHU de Bordeaux, Pôle de santé publique, Service de pharmacologie médicale, 33000, Bordeaux, France.

出版信息

Drug Saf. 2018 Apr;41(4):377-387. doi: 10.1007/s40264-017-0618-y.

DOI:10.1007/s40264-017-0618-y
PMID:29185236
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Signal detection from healthcare databases is possible, but is not yet used for routine surveillance of drug safety. One challenge is to develop methods for selecting signals that should be assessed with priority.

AIM

The aim of this study was to develop an automated system combining safety signal detection and prioritization from healthcare databases and applicable to drugs used in chronic diseases.

METHODS

Patients present in the French EGB healthcare database for at least 1 year between 2005 and 2015 were considered. Noninsulin glucose-lowering drugs (NIGLDs) were selected as a case study, and hospitalization data were used to select important medical events (IME). Signal detection was performed quarterly from 2008 to 2015 using sequence symmetry analysis. NIGLD/IME associations were screened if one or more exposed case was identified in the quarter, and three or more exposed cases were identified in the population at the date of screening. Detected signals were prioritized using the Longitudinal-SNIP (L-SNIP) algorithm based on strength (S), novelty (N), and potential impact of signal (I), and pattern of drug use (P). Signals scored in the top 10% were identified as of high priority. A reference set was built based on NIGLD summaries of product characteristics (SPCs) to compute the performance of the developed system.

RESULTS

A total of 815 associations were screened and 241 (29.6%) were detected as signals; among these, 58 (24.1%) were prioritized. The performance for signal detection was sensitivity = 47%; specificity = 80%; positive predictive value (PPV) 33%; negative predictive value = 82%. The use of the L-SNIP algorithm increased the early identification of positive controls, restricted to those mentioned in the SPCs after 2008: PPV = 100% versus PPV = 14% with its non-use. The system revealed a strong new signal with dipeptidylpeptidase-4 inhibitors and venous thromboembolism.

CONCLUSION

The developed system seems promising for the routine use of healthcare data for safety surveillance of drugs used in chronic diseases.

摘要

简介

从医疗保健数据库中检测信号是可行的,但尚未用于药物安全性的常规监测。其中一个挑战是开发用于优先评估的信号选择方法。

目的

本研究旨在开发一种自动系统,结合从医疗保健数据库中检测和优先处理药物安全信号,适用于慢性病中使用的药物。

方法

考虑了 2005 年至 2015 年间在法国 EGB 医疗保健数据库中至少存在 1 年的患者。选择非胰岛素类降血糖药物(NIGLD)作为案例研究,并使用住院数据选择重要医疗事件(IME)。从 2008 年到 2015 年,每季度使用序列对称分析进行信号检测。如果在该季度识别出一个或多个暴露病例,并且在筛选日期在人群中识别出三个或更多暴露病例,则筛选 NIGLD/IME 关联。使用基于强度(S)、新颖性(N)和信号潜在影响(I)以及药物使用模式(P)的纵向 SNIP(L-SNIP)算法对检测到的信号进行优先级排序。得分在前 10%的信号被确定为高优先级。基于 NIGLD 产品特性总结(SPC)构建了参考集,以计算所开发系统的性能。

结果

共筛选了 815 个关联,检测到 241 个(29.6%)作为信号;其中 58 个(24.1%)被优先排序。信号检测的性能为敏感性=47%;特异性=80%;阳性预测值(PPV)33%;阴性预测值=82%。使用 L-SNIP 算法可以更早地识别出阳性对照物,这些对照物仅限于 2008 年后 SPC 中提到的对照物:使用 L-SNIP 算法时的 PPV=100%,而不使用时的 PPV=14%。该系统揭示了一种新型的二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂和静脉血栓栓塞的强烈信号。

结论

所开发的系统似乎有望用于慢性病中使用的药物的常规医疗保健数据安全性监测。

相似文献

1
An Automated System Combining Safety Signal Detection and Prioritization from Healthcare Databases: A Pilot Study.基于医疗数据库的自动安全信号检测与优先级排序系统:一项试点研究。
Drug Saf. 2018 Apr;41(4):377-387. doi: 10.1007/s40264-017-0618-y.
2
Application and optimisation of the Comparison on Extreme Laboratory Tests (CERT) algorithm for detection of adverse drug reactions: Transferability across national boundaries.用于检测药物不良反应的极端实验室测试比较(CERT)算法的应用与优化:跨国界的可转移性。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2018 Jan;27(1):87-94. doi: 10.1002/pds.4340. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
3
Useful Interplay Between Spontaneous ADR Reports and Electronic Healthcare Records in Signal Detection.自发不良反应报告与电子健康记录在信号检测中的有益相互作用。
Drug Saf. 2015 Dec;38(12):1201-10. doi: 10.1007/s40264-015-0341-5.
4
A reference standard for evaluation of methods for drug safety signal detection using electronic healthcare record databases.用于评估使用电子医疗记录数据库进行药物安全信号检测方法的参考标准。
Drug Saf. 2013 Jan;36(1):13-23. doi: 10.1007/s40264-012-0002-x.
5
From Big Data to Smart Data for Pharmacovigilance: The Role of Healthcare Databases and Other Emerging Sources.从大数据到药物警戒的智能数据:医疗数据库和其他新兴来源的作用。
Drug Saf. 2018 Feb;41(2):143-149. doi: 10.1007/s40264-017-0592-4.
6
The role of electronic healthcare record databases in paediatric drug safety surveillance: a retrospective cohort study.电子健康记录数据库在儿科药物安全性监测中的作用:一项回顾性队列研究。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Aug;80(2):304-14. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12610. Epub 2015 May 20.
7
Longitudinal medical records as a complement to routine drug safety signal analysis.纵向医疗记录作为常规药物安全信号分析的补充
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2015 May;24(5):486-94. doi: 10.1002/pds.3739. Epub 2015 Jan 27.
8
Time Series Disturbance Detection for Hypothesis-Free Signal Detection in Longitudinal Observational Databases.无假设信号的纵向观察数据库中时间序列干扰检测。
Drug Saf. 2018 Jun;41(6):565-577. doi: 10.1007/s40264-018-0640-8.
9
Evaluating performance of electronic healthcare records and spontaneous reporting data in drug safety signal detection.评估电子健康记录和自发报告数据在药物安全信号检测中的性能。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2015 Feb;37(1):94-104. doi: 10.1007/s11096-014-0044-5. Epub 2014 Dec 9.
10
Structured assessment for prospective identification of safety signals in electronic medical records: evaluation in the health improvement network.用于前瞻性识别电子病历中安全信号的结构化评估:在健康改善网络中的评估
Drug Saf. 2015 Jan;38(1):87-100. doi: 10.1007/s40264-014-0251-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial intelligence in pharmacovigilance: a narrative review and practical experience with an expert-defined Bayesian network tool.药物警戒中的人工智能:一项叙述性综述及使用专家定义的贝叶斯网络工具的实践经验
Int J Clin Pharm. 2025 Aug;47(4):932-944. doi: 10.1007/s11096-025-01975-3. Epub 2025 Jul 30.
2
Exploring the impact of design criteria for reference sets on performance evaluation of signal detection algorithms: The case of drug-drug interactions.探索参考集设计标准对信号检测算法性能评估的影响:以药物相互作用为例。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2023 Aug;32(8):832-844. doi: 10.1002/pds.5609. Epub 2023 Mar 26.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Trends in the incidence of use of noninsulin glucose-lowering drugs between 2006 and 2013 in France.2006年至2013年期间法国非胰岛素降糖药物使用发生率的趋势。
Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Dec;31(6):663-675. doi: 10.1111/fcp.12298. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
2
The national healthcare system claims databases in France, SNIIRAM and EGB: Powerful tools for pharmacoepidemiology.法国的国家医疗保健系统拥有SNIIRAM和EGB数据库:药物流行病学的强大工具。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2017 Aug;26(8):954-962. doi: 10.1002/pds.4233. Epub 2017 May 24.
3
Methods for safety signal detection in healthcare databases: a literature review.
Methods for drug safety signal detection using routinely collected observational electronic health care data: A systematic review.
利用常规收集的观察性电子医疗保健数据检测药物安全信号的方法:系统评价。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2023 Jan;32(1):28-43. doi: 10.1002/pds.5548. Epub 2022 Nov 2.
4
Concomitant Medication Use With Xiyanping Injection and the Risk of Suspected Allergic Reactions: A Nested Case-Control Study Based on China's National Medical Insurance Database.喜炎平注射液的合并用药情况及疑似过敏反应风险:一项基于中国国家医保数据库的巢式病例对照研究
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Jun 21;13:883407. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.883407. eCollection 2022.
5
Hypothesis-free signal detection in healthcare databases: finding its value for pharmacovigilance.医疗保健数据库中的无假设信号检测:探寻其在药物警戒中的价值。
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2019 Aug 5;10:2042098619864744. doi: 10.1177/2042098619864744. eCollection 2019.
医疗保健数据库中安全信号检测的方法:文献综述。
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2017 Jun;16(6):721-732. doi: 10.1080/14740338.2017.1325463. Epub 2017 May 15.
4
Pioglitazone use and risk of bladder cancer: population based cohort study.吡格列酮的使用与膀胱癌风险:基于人群的队列研究。
BMJ. 2016 Mar 30;352:i1541. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i1541.
5
Good Signal Detection Practices: Evidence from IMI PROTECT.良好的信号检测实践:来自IMI PROTECT的证据。
Drug Saf. 2016 Jun;39(6):469-90. doi: 10.1007/s40264-016-0405-1.
6
Statistical Signal Detection as a Routine Pharmacovigilance Practice: Effects of Periodicity and Resignalling Criteria on Quality and Workload.作为常规药物警戒实践的统计信号检测:周期性和重新信号标准对质量和工作量的影响
Drug Saf. 2015 Dec;38(12):1219-31. doi: 10.1007/s40264-015-0345-1.
7
Improved statistical signal detection in pharmacovigilance by combining multiple strength-of-evidence aspects in vigiRank.通过在vigiRank中结合多个证据强度方面来改进药物警戒中的统计信号检测。
Drug Saf. 2014 Aug;37(8):617-28. doi: 10.1007/s40264-014-0204-5.
8
Pharmacological prioritisation of signals of disproportionate reporting: proposal of an algorithm and pilot evaluation.不成比例报告信号的药理学优先级排序:一种算法的提议及初步评估
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2014 May;70(5):617-25. doi: 10.1007/s00228-014-1657-2. Epub 2014 Mar 5.
9
Replication of the OMOP experiment in Europe: evaluating methods for risk identification in electronic health record databases.在欧洲复制 OMOP 实验:评估电子健康记录数据库中风险识别方法。
Drug Saf. 2013 Oct;36 Suppl 1:S159-69. doi: 10.1007/s40264-013-0109-8.
10
A comparison of the empirical performance of methods for a risk identification system.方法在风险识别系统中的实证性能比较。
Drug Saf. 2013 Oct;36 Suppl 1:S143-58. doi: 10.1007/s40264-013-0108-9.