• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无假设信号的纵向观察数据库中时间序列干扰检测。

Time Series Disturbance Detection for Hypothesis-Free Signal Detection in Longitudinal Observational Databases.

机构信息

Pfizer Inc, 235 East 42nd St., New York, NY, USA.

New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Drug Saf. 2018 Jun;41(6):565-577. doi: 10.1007/s40264-018-0640-8.

DOI:10.1007/s40264-018-0640-8
PMID:29468602
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Signal detection remains a cornerstone activity of pharmacovigilance. Routine quantitative signal detection primarily focuses on screening of spontaneous reports. In striving to enhance quantitative signal detection capability further, other data streams are being considered for their potential contribution as sources of emerging signals, one of which is longitudinal observational databases, including electronic medical record (EMR) and transactional insurance claims databases. Quantitative signal detection on such databases is a nascent field-with published methods being primarily based either on individual metrics, which may not effectively represent the complexity of the longitudinal records and their necessary variation for analysis for drug-outcome pairs, or on visualization discovery approaches leveraging multiple aspects of the records, which are not particularly tractable to high-throughput hypothesis-free signal detection. One extensively tested example of the latter is chronographs.

METHODS

We apply a disturbance detection algorithm to chronographs using UK EMR The Health Improvement Network (THIN) data. The algorithm utilizes autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA)-based time series methodology designed to find disturbances that occur outside the normal pattern trends of the ARIMA model for the chronograph. Chronographs currently highlight drug-event pairs as potentially worthy of further clinical assessment, via filter-based increases in disproportionality scores from before to after the index drug exposure, tested across a range of case and control windows.

RESULTS

We replicate the findings on six exemplar chronographs from a previous publication, and show how disturbances can be effectively detected across this set of pairs. Further, 692 disturbances were detected in analysis of all 384 individual READ code outcomes ever recorded 50 or more times for patients prescribed sibutramine. The disturbances are algorithmically further broken into subsets of clinical interest.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the disturbance algorithm approach shows promising capacity for detecting outliers, and shows tractability of the algorithmic approach for large-scale screening. The method offers an array of pattern types for detection and clinical review.

摘要

简介

信号检测仍然是药物警戒的基石活动。常规的定量信号检测主要侧重于自发报告的筛选。为了进一步提高定量信号检测能力,正在考虑其他数据流,以挖掘潜在的新兴信号源,其中之一是纵向观察性数据库,包括电子病历(EMR)和交易性保险索赔数据库。此类数据库的定量信号检测尚处于起步阶段-已发表的方法主要基于单个指标,这些指标可能无法有效反映纵向记录的复杂性及其对药物-结果对进行分析的必要变化,或者基于利用记录多个方面的可视化发现方法,但这些方法不太适合高通量无假设信号检测。后者的一个经过广泛测试的示例是计时图。

方法

我们使用英国电子病历健康改善网络(THIN)数据,使用干扰检测算法对计时图进行分析。该算法利用基于自回归综合移动平均(ARIMA)的时间序列方法学,旨在找到计时图的 ARIMA 模型正常趋势之外的干扰。计时图目前通过在指数药物暴露前后基于过滤的比例失调分数增加来突出显示潜在值得进一步临床评估的药物-事件对,在一系列病例和对照窗口中进行测试。

结果

我们复制了先前出版物中六个范例计时图的发现,并展示了如何在这组对中有效地检测干扰。此外,在对所有 384 个为服用西布曲明的患者记录的 50 次或更多次的 READ 代码结果进行分析中,检测到 692 个干扰。这些干扰是通过算法进一步分为具有临床意义的子集。

结论

总的来说,干扰算法方法显示出检测异常值的良好能力,并且算法方法具有大规模筛选的可操作性。该方法提供了一系列用于检测和临床审查的模式类型。

相似文献

1
Time Series Disturbance Detection for Hypothesis-Free Signal Detection in Longitudinal Observational Databases.无假设信号的纵向观察数据库中时间序列干扰检测。
Drug Saf. 2018 Jun;41(6):565-577. doi: 10.1007/s40264-018-0640-8.
2
Longitudinal medical records as a complement to routine drug safety signal analysis.纵向医疗记录作为常规药物安全信号分析的补充
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2015 May;24(5):486-94. doi: 10.1002/pds.3739. Epub 2015 Jan 27.
3
Structured assessment for prospective identification of safety signals in electronic medical records: evaluation in the health improvement network.用于前瞻性识别电子病历中安全信号的结构化评估:在健康改善网络中的评估
Drug Saf. 2015 Jan;38(1):87-100. doi: 10.1007/s40264-014-0251-y.
4
Useful Interplay Between Spontaneous ADR Reports and Electronic Healthcare Records in Signal Detection.自发不良反应报告与电子健康记录在信号检测中的有益相互作用。
Drug Saf. 2015 Dec;38(12):1201-10. doi: 10.1007/s40264-015-0341-5.
5
An Automated System Combining Safety Signal Detection and Prioritization from Healthcare Databases: A Pilot Study.基于医疗数据库的自动安全信号检测与优先级排序系统:一项试点研究。
Drug Saf. 2018 Apr;41(4):377-387. doi: 10.1007/s40264-017-0618-y.
6
Pharmacovigilance - The next chapter.药物警戒——新篇章。
Therapie. 2019 Dec;74(6):557-567. doi: 10.1016/j.therap.2019.09.004. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
7
Comparison of statistical signal detection methods within and across spontaneous reporting databases.自发报告数据库内部及之间统计信号检测方法的比较。
Drug Saf. 2015 Jun;38(6):577-87. doi: 10.1007/s40264-015-0289-5.
8
A Feasibility Study of Drug-Drug Interaction Signal Detection in Regular Pharmacovigilance.常规药物警戒中药物-药物相互作用信号检测的可行性研究
Drug Saf. 2020 Aug;43(8):775-785. doi: 10.1007/s40264-020-00939-y.
9
Disproportionality Analysis for Pharmacovigilance Signal Detection in Small Databases or Subsets: Recommendations for Limiting False-Positive Associations.药品不良反应信号检测中小数据库或子数据集的不均衡性分析:限制假阳性关联的建议。
Drug Saf. 2020 May;43(5):479-487. doi: 10.1007/s40264-020-00911-w.
10
Contribution of Causality Assessment for an Automated Detection of Safety Signals: An Example Using the French Pharmacovigilance Database.因果关系评估对自动检测安全信号的贡献:用法语药物警戒数据库举例。
Drug Saf. 2020 Mar;43(3):243-253. doi: 10.1007/s40264-019-00887-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Interplay of Spontaneous Reporting and Longitudinal Healthcare Databases for Signal Management: Position Statement from the Real-World Evidence and Big Data Special Interest Group of the International Society of Pharmacovigilance.自发报告与纵向医疗保健数据库在信号管理中的相互作用:国际药物警戒协会真实世界证据与大数据特别兴趣小组的立场声明
Drug Saf. 2025 Apr 13. doi: 10.1007/s40264-025-01548-3.
2
The evolution of the Pharmacovigilance department in the pharmaceutical industry: results of an Italian national survey.制药行业药物警戒部门的发展:一项意大利全国性调查的结果
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2024 Nov 4;15:20420986241293296. doi: 10.1177/20420986241293296. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Methods for safety signal detection in healthcare databases: a literature review.医疗保健数据库中安全信号检测的方法:文献综述。
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2017 Jun;16(6):721-732. doi: 10.1080/14740338.2017.1325463. Epub 2017 May 15.
2
Sequence Symmetry Analysis as a Signal Detection Tool for Potential Heart Failure Adverse Events in an Administrative Claims Database.序列对称性分析作为行政索赔数据库中潜在心力衰竭不良事件的信号检测工具
Drug Saf. 2016 Apr;39(4):347-54. doi: 10.1007/s40264-015-0391-8.
3
Structured assessment for prospective identification of safety signals in electronic medical records: evaluation in the health improvement network.
Optimal Significance Levels and Sample Sizes for Signal Detection Methods Based on Non-constant Hazards.
基于非恒定风险的信号检测方法的最优显著水平和样本量。
Drug Saf. 2024 Nov;47(11):1149-1156. doi: 10.1007/s40264-024-01460-2. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
4
Finding Potential Adverse Events in the Unstructured Text of Electronic Health Care Records: Development of the Shakespeare Method.在电子医疗记录的非结构化文本中发现潜在不良事件:莎士比亚方法的开发。
JMIRx Med. 2021 Aug 11;2(3):e27017. doi: 10.2196/27017.
5
Use of Electronic Health Record Data for Drug Safety Signal Identification: A Scoping Review.利用电子健康记录数据识别药物安全信号:范围综述。
Drug Saf. 2023 Aug;46(8):725-742. doi: 10.1007/s40264-023-01325-0. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
6
Methods for drug safety signal detection using routinely collected observational electronic health care data: A systematic review.利用常规收集的观察性电子医疗保健数据检测药物安全信号的方法:系统评价。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2023 Jan;32(1):28-43. doi: 10.1002/pds.5548. Epub 2022 Nov 2.
7
Generalised weibull model-based approaches to detect non-constant hazard to signal adverse drug reactions in longitudinal data.基于广义威布尔模型的方法,用于在纵向数据中检测非恒定风险以提示药物不良反应。
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Aug 23;13:889088. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.889088. eCollection 2022.
8
Machine Learning in Causal Inference: Application in Pharmacovigilance.机器学习在因果推断中的应用:在药物警戒中的应用。
Drug Saf. 2022 May;45(5):459-476. doi: 10.1007/s40264-022-01155-6. Epub 2022 May 17.
9
Influence of COVID-19 on the Pharmacovigilance Workforce of the Future.新型冠状病毒肺炎对未来药物警戒工作人员的影响。
Clin Ther. 2021 Feb;43(2):369-371. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2020.12.019. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
10
Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Spontaneous Reporting: Global and National Time-series Analyses.新冠疫情对自发报告的影响:全球和国家时间序列分析。
Clin Ther. 2021 Feb;43(2):360-368.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2020.12.008. Epub 2020 Dec 18.
用于前瞻性识别电子病历中安全信号的结构化评估:在健康改善网络中的评估
Drug Saf. 2015 Jan;38(1):87-100. doi: 10.1007/s40264-014-0251-y.
4
Using real-world healthcare data for pharmacovigilance signal detection - the experience of the EU-ADR project.利用真实世界医疗保健数据进行药物警戒信号检测——欧盟药物不良反应(EU-ADR)项目的经验
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Jan;8(1):95-102. doi: 10.1586/17512433.2015.992878.
5
Empirical performance of the calibrated self-controlled cohort analysis within temporal pattern discovery: lessons for developing a risk identification and analysis system.校准的自我对照队列分析在时间模式发现中的经验性能:为开发风险识别和分析系统提供的经验。
Drug Saf. 2013 Oct;36 Suppl 1:S107-21. doi: 10.1007/s40264-013-0095-x.
6
Generalisability of The Health Improvement Network (THIN) database: demographics, chronic disease prevalence and mortality rates.健康改善网络(THIN)数据库的可推广性:人口统计学、慢性病患病率和死亡率
Inform Prim Care. 2011;19(4):251-5. doi: 10.14236/jhi.v19i4.820.
7
Terminological challenges in safety surveillance.安全监测中的术语挑战。
Drug Saf. 2012 Jan 1;35(1):79-84. doi: 10.2165/11598700-000000000-00000.
8
Shrinkage observed-to-expected ratios for robust and transparent large-scale pattern discovery.稳健透明的大规模模式发现的观测到的预期收缩比。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2013 Feb;22(1):57-69. doi: 10.1177/0962280211403604. Epub 2011 Jun 24.
9
EU-ADR healthcare database network vs. spontaneous reporting system database: preliminary comparison of signal detection.欧盟药品不良反应医疗保健数据库网络与自发报告系统数据库:信号检测的初步比较
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011;166:25-30.
10
Bayesian confidence propagation neural network.贝叶斯置信传播神经网络
Drug Saf. 2007;30(7):623-5. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200730070-00011.