Banerjee Moitree, Cavanagh Kate, Strauss Clara
School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9QH UK.
Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Sussex Education Centre, Mill View Hospital, Nevill Avenue, Hove, BN3 7HY UK.
Mindfulness (N Y). 2017;8(6):1653-1664. doi: 10.1007/s12671-017-0740-z. Epub 2017 May 25.
In order to increase the cost-efficiency, availability and ease of accessing and delivering mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs), clinical and research interest in mindfulness-based self-help (MBSH) interventions has increased in recent years. Several studies have shown promising results of effectiveness of MBSH. However, like all self-help interventions, dropout rates and disengagement from MBSH are high. The current study explored the facilitators and barriers of engaging in a MBSH intervention. Semi-structured interviews with members of healthcare staff who took part in an MBSH intervention ( = 16) were conducted. A thematic analysis approach was used to derive central themes around engagement from the interviews. Analyses resulted in four overarching themes characterising facilitation and hindrance to engagement in MBSH. These are "attitude towards engagement", "intervention characteristics", "process of change" and "perceived consequences". Long practices, emerging negative thoughts and becoming self-critical were identified as the key hindrances, whilst need for stress reduction techniques, shorter practices and increased sense of agency over thoughts were identified as the key facilitators. Clinical and research implications are discussed.
为了提高基于正念干预措施(MBIs)的成本效益、可用性以及获取和提供的便利性,近年来,临床和研究领域对基于正念的自助(MBSH)干预措施的兴趣有所增加。多项研究表明MBSH具有良好的有效性结果。然而,与所有自助干预措施一样,MBSH的退出率和脱离率很高。本研究探讨了参与MBSH干预的促进因素和障碍。对参与MBSH干预的医护人员(n = 16)进行了半结构化访谈。采用主题分析方法从访谈中得出围绕参与度的核心主题。分析得出了四个总体主题,这些主题表征了参与MBSH的促进因素和阻碍因素。它们分别是“对参与的态度”“干预特征”“改变过程”和“感知后果”。长时间练习、出现消极想法和自我批评被确定为关键阻碍因素,而对减压技巧的需求、较短的练习时间和对思维的控制感增强被确定为关键促进因素。文中还讨论了临床和研究意义。