Shulman Grant P, Holt Natalie R, Hope Debra A, Mocarski Richard, Eyer Joshua, Woodruff Nathan
University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
University of Nebraska-Kearney.
Psychol Sex Orientat Gend Divers. 2017 Sep;4(3):304-313. doi: 10.1037/sgd0000233. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
There is increasing recognition of the need for culturally sensitive services for individuals who identify as transgender or gender non-conforming (TGNC), and only recently have empirical studies appeared in the literature that inform best practices for TGNC people. Competent, culturally appropriate clinical services and research depend upon methodologically sound assessment of key constructs, but it is unclear whether appropriate self-report or clinician-rated assessment tools for adults exist. This paper reviewed existing published measures to identify areas of strength as well as existing gaps in the available research. The search strategy for this systematic review identified any published paper describing a self-report or clinician-rated scale for assessing transgender-related concerns. Each measure was reviewed for information on its scope, reliability, validity, strengths, limitations, and source. The majority of these questionnaires were developed with the TGNC communities and targeted important factors that affect quality of life for TGNC people. Limitations included limited evidence for validity, reliability, and sensitivity to change. Overall, the field is moving in the direction of TGNC-affirming assessment, and promising measures have been created to monitor important aspects of quality of life for TGNC people. Future research should continue to validate these measures for use in assessing clinical outcomes and the monitoring of treatment progress.
对于认同自己为跨性别者或性别不一致者(TGNC)的个体而言,提供具有文化敏感性的服务的必要性正日益得到认可,而直到最近,文献中才出现实证研究,为TGNC人群的最佳实践提供参考。专业的、符合文化背景的临床服务和研究依赖于对关键构念进行方法合理的评估,但目前尚不清楚是否存在适用于成年人的恰当的自我报告或临床医生评定的评估工具。本文回顾了已发表的现有测量方法,以确定其优势领域以及现有研究中的空白。本次系统综述的检索策略确定了任何描述用于评估与跨性别相关问题的自我报告或临床医生评定量表的已发表论文。对每项测量方法都审查了其范围、信度、效度、优势、局限性和来源等信息。这些问卷大多是与TGNC群体共同开发的,针对影响TGNC人群生活质量的重要因素。局限性包括效度、信度和对变化的敏感性方面的证据有限。总体而言,该领域正朝着肯定TGNC的评估方向发展,并且已经创建了有前景的测量方法来监测TGNC人群生活质量的重要方面。未来的研究应继续验证这些测量方法在评估临床结果和监测治疗进展方面的用途。