Fenny Ama Pokuaa, Kusi Anthony, Arhinful Daniel K, Asante Felix Ankoma
Economics Division, Institute of Statistical, Social and Economic Research (ISSER), University of Ghana, PO Box LG 74, Legon, LG74 Accra, Ghana.
Department of Epidemiology, Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Glob Health Res Policy. 2016 Nov 22;1:18. doi: 10.1186/s41256-016-0018-3. eCollection 2016.
The effort to expand access to healthcare and reduce health inequalities in many low income countries have meant that many have adopted different levels of social health protection mechanisms. Ghana introduced a National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) in 2005 with the aim of removing previous barriers created by the user fees financing system. Although the NHIS has made health accessible to some category of people, the majority of Ghanaians (60 %) are not enroled on the scheme. Earlier studies have looked at various factors that account for this low uptake. However, we recognise that this qualitative study will nuance the depth of these barriers to enrolment.
Minimally structured, qualitative interviews were conducted with key stakeholders at the district, regional and national levels. Focus group discussions were also undertaken at the community level. Using an inductive and content analytic approach, the transcripts were analyzed to identify and define categories that explain low uptake of health insurance.
The results are presented under two broad themes: sociocultural and systemic factors. Sociocultural factors identified were 1) vulnerability within certain groups such as the aged and the disabled groups which impeded access to the NHIS 2) cultural and religious norms which discouraged enrolment into the scheme. System-wide factors were 1) inadequate distribution of social infrastructure such as healthcare facilities, 2) weak administrative processes within the NHIS, and 3) poor quality of care.
Mapping the interplay of these dynamic relations between the NHIS, its clients and service providers, the study identifies critical factors at the policy-making level, service provider level, and client level (reflective in household and community level institutional arrangements) that affect enrolment in the scheme. Our findings inform a number of potential reforms in the area of distribution of health resources and cost containment to expand coverage, increase choices and meeting the needs of the end user.
在许多低收入国家,为扩大医疗保健服务的可及性并减少健康不平等所做的努力意味着许多国家采用了不同层次的社会健康保护机制。加纳于2005年推出了国家健康保险计划(NHIS),旨在消除此前使用者付费融资系统造成的障碍。尽管国家健康保险计划已使某些人群能够获得医疗服务,但大多数加纳人(60%)并未加入该计划。早期研究考察了导致参保率低的各种因素。然而,我们认识到这项定性研究将细化这些参保障碍的深度。
对地区、区域和国家层面的关键利益相关者进行了结构松散的定性访谈。还在社区层面开展了焦点小组讨论。采用归纳和内容分析方法,对访谈记录进行分析,以识别和界定解释健康保险参保率低的类别。
结果分为两个宽泛的主题呈现:社会文化因素和系统因素。识别出的社会文化因素有:1)某些群体(如老年人和残疾人群体)的脆弱性阻碍了他们加入国家健康保险计划;2)文化和宗教规范不鼓励人们加入该计划。系统层面的因素有:1)医疗保健设施等社会基础设施分布不足;2)国家健康保险计划内部行政流程薄弱;3)医疗服务质量差。
通过梳理国家健康保险计划、其客户和服务提供者之间这些动态关系的相互作用,该研究确定了在政策制定层面、服务提供者层面和客户层面(反映在家庭和社区层面的机构安排中)影响该计划参保率的关键因素。我们的研究结果为健康资源分配和成本控制领域的一些潜在改革提供了参考,以扩大覆盖范围、增加选择并满足最终用户的需求。