Suppr超能文献

心脏手术患者桡动脉张力脉搏分析仪与脉冲多普勒超声心动图衍生血流动力学参数的比较:一项初步研究。

Comparison between radial artery tonometry pulse analyzer and pulsed-Doppler echocardiography derived hemodynamic parameters in cardiac surgery patients: a pilot study.

作者信息

Zayat Rashad, Goetzenich Andreas, Lee Ju-Yeon, Kang HeeJung, Jansen-Park So-Hyun, Schmitz-Rode Thomas, Musetti Giulia, Schnoering Heike, Autschbach Rüdiger, Hatam Nima, Aljalloud Ali

机构信息

Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, RWTH University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany.

Institute of Applied Medical Engineering, Helmholtz Institute, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.

出版信息

PeerJ. 2017 Dec 6;5:e4132. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4132. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bedside non-invasive techniques, such as radial artery tonometry, to estimate hemodynamic parameters have gained increased relevance as an attractive alternative and efficient method to measure hemodynamics in outpatient departments. For our pilot study, we sought to compare cardiac output (CO), and stroke volume (SV) estimated from a radial artery tonometry blood pressure pulse analyzer (BPPA) (DMP-Life, DAEYOMEDI Co., Gyeonggi-do, South Korea) to pulsed-wave Doppler (PWD) echocardiography derived parameters.

METHODS

From January 2015 to December 2016, all patients scheduled for coronary artery bypass (CABG) surgery at our department were screened. Exclusion criteria were, inter alia, moderate to severe aortic- or Mitral valve disease and peripheral arterial disease (PAD) > stage II. One hundred and seven patients were included (mean age 66.1 ± 9.9, 15 females, mean BMI 27.2 ± 4.1 kg/m). All patients had pre-operative transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). We measured the hemodynamic parameters with the BPPA from the radial artery, randomly before or after TTE. For the comparison between the measurement methods we used the Bland-Altman test and Pearson correlation.

RESULTS

Mean TTE-CO was 5.1 ± 0.96 L/min, and the mean BPPA-CO was 5.2 ± 0.85 L/min. The Bland-Altman analysis for CO revealed a bias of -0.13 L/min and SD of 0.90 L/min with upper and lower limits of agreement of -1.91 and +1.64 L/min. The correlation of CO measurements between DMP-life and TTE was poor ( = 0.501,  < 0.0001). The mean TTE-SV was 71.3 ± 16.2 mL and the mean BPPA-SV was 73.8 ± 19.2 mL. SV measurements correlated very well between the two methods ( = 0.900,  < 0.0001). The Bland-Altman analysis for SV revealed a bias of -2.54 mL and SD of ±8.42 mL and upper and lower limits of agreement of -19.05 and +13.96 mL, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our study shows for the first time that the DMP-life tonometry device measures SV and CO with reasonable accuracy and precision of agreement compared with TTE in preoperative cardiothoracic surgery patients. Tonometry BPPA are relatively quick and simple measuring devices, which facilitate the collection of cardiac and hemodynamic information. Further studies with a larger number of patients and with repeated measurements are in progress to test the reliability and repeatability of DMP-Life system.

摘要

背景

诸如桡动脉压力测量法等床旁非侵入性技术,作为一种有吸引力的替代方法和在门诊测量血流动力学的有效手段,其重要性日益增加。在我们的初步研究中,我们试图将通过桡动脉压力测量血压脉搏分析仪(BPPA)(DMP-Life,韩国京畿道DAEYOMEDI公司)估算的心输出量(CO)和每搏输出量(SV)与脉冲波多普勒(PWD)超声心动图得出的参数进行比较。

方法

2015年1月至2016年12月,对在我们科室计划进行冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG)的所有患者进行筛选。排除标准包括中度至重度主动脉或二尖瓣疾病以及外周动脉疾病(PAD)> II期等。纳入107例患者(平均年龄66.1±9.9岁,15名女性,平均BMI 27.2±4.1kg/m²)。所有患者均进行了术前经胸超声心动图(TTE)检查。我们在TTE之前或之后随机通过BPPA从桡动脉测量血流动力学参数。为了比较测量方法,我们使用了布兰德-奥特曼检验和皮尔逊相关性分析。

结果

TTE测量的平均CO为5.1±0.96L/min,BPPA测量的平均CO为5.2±0.85L/min。CO的布兰德-奥特曼分析显示偏差为-0.13L/min,标准差为0.90L/min,一致性界限的上限和下限分别为-1.91和+1.64L/min。DMP-life与TTE测量的CO之间的相关性较差(r = 0.501,p < 0.0001)。TTE测量的平均SV为71.3±16.2mL,BPPA测量的平均SV为73.8±19.2mL。两种方法测量的SV之间相关性非常好(r = 0.900,p < 0.0001)。SV的布兰德-奥特曼分析显示偏差为-2.54mL,标准差为±8.42mL,一致性界限的上限和下限分别为-19.05和+13.96mL。

结论

我们的研究首次表明,在术前心胸外科手术患者中,与TTE相比,DMP-life压力测量设备测量SV和CO具有合理的准确性和一致性精度。压力测量BPPA是相对快速且简单的测量设备,有助于收集心脏和血流动力学信息。正在进行更多患者和重复测量的进一步研究,以测试DMP-Life系统的可靠性和可重复性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f25e/5723137/c0da8b166503/peerj-05-4132-g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验