Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University - UNESP, R: José Bonifácio, 1193. Vila Mendonça, Araçatuba, SP, Brazil.
Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University - UNESP, R: José Bonifácio, 1193. Vila Mendonça, Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil.
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 May;22(4):1825-1837. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2278-9. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
This systematic review (PROSPERO register: CRD42016053140) investigated the influence of different types of light on the pulp tissue during dental bleaching.
Two independent authors conducted a systematic search and risk of bias evaluations. An electronic search was undertaken (PubMed/Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other databases) until May 2017. The population, intervention, comparison, outcomes (PICO) question was: "Does the light in dental bleaching change the response of the pulp to the bleaching procedure?" The intervention involved pulp tissue/cells after bleaching with light, while the comparison involved pulp tissue/cells after bleaching without light. The primary outcome was the inflammation/cytotoxicity observed in pulp after bleaching.
Out of 2210 articles found, 12 articles were included in the review; four were in vivo studies (one study in dogs/others in human), and eight were in vitro studies (cell culture/with artificial pulp chamber or not). The light source used was halogen, light-emitting diode (LED), and laser. Only one in vivo study that used heat to simulate light effects showed significant pulp inflammation. Only two in vitro studies demonstrated that light influenced cell metabolism; one using halogen light indicated negative effects, and the other using laser therapy indicated positive effects. Given that animal and in vitro studies have been identified, there remain some limitations for extrapolation to the human situation. Furthermore, different light parameters were used.
The effects of dental bleaching on the pulp are not influenced by different types of light, but different light parameters can influence these properties.
There is insufficient evidence about the influence of different types of light on inflammation/cytotoxicity of the pulp.
本系统评价(PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42016053140)研究了不同类型的光在牙齿漂白过程中对牙髓组织的影响。
两名独立作者进行了系统检索和偏倚风险评估。电子检索(PubMed/Medline、Embase、The Cochrane Library 和其他数据库)截至 2017 年 5 月。人群、干预、比较、结局(PICO)问题为:“牙齿漂白中的光是否会改变牙髓对漂白过程的反应?”干预措施涉及光漂白后的牙髓组织/细胞,而比较措施涉及无光照漂白后的牙髓组织/细胞。主要结局为漂白后牙髓观察到的炎症/细胞毒性。
在 2210 篇文章中,有 12 篇文章被纳入综述;其中 4 篇为体内研究(1 篇在犬中进行,其余在人中进行),8 篇为体外研究(细胞培养/有无人工牙髓腔)。使用的光源为卤素、发光二极管(LED)和激光。只有一项使用热来模拟光效应的体内研究显示出明显的牙髓炎症。只有两项体外研究表明光影响细胞代谢;一项使用卤素光表明存在负面效应,另一项使用激光治疗表明存在正面效应。鉴于已经确定了动物和体外研究,将其外推到人类情况仍存在一些局限性。此外,还使用了不同的光参数。
不同类型的光对牙髓的漂白效果没有影响,但不同的光参数会影响这些特性。
关于不同类型的光对牙髓炎症/细胞毒性的影响,证据不足。