a Department of Social Sciences & Health Policy, Division of Public Health Sciences , Wake Forest School of Medicine.
b School of Media and Journalism , University of North Carolina.
Health Commun. 2019 Mar;34(3):343-351. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2017.1407277. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
Adolescents and young adults smoke waterpipe tobacco (WT) and cigarillos, at least in part, based on erroneous beliefs that these products are safer than cigarettes. To address this challenge, we used a systematic, three-phase process to develop a health communication campaign to discourage WT and cigarillo smoking among at-risk (tobacco users and susceptible non-users) 16- to 25-year-olds. In Phase 1, we used a national phone survey (N = 896) to determine salient message beliefs. Participants reported constituents (i.e., harmful chemicals) emitted by the products were worrisome. In Phase 2, we developed and evaluated four message executions, with varying imagery, tone, and unappealing products with the same constituents, using focus groups (N = 38). Participants rated one execution highly, resulting in our development of a campaign where each message: (1) identified a tobacco product and constituent in the smoke; (2) included an image of an unappealing product containing the constituent (e.g., pesticides, gasoline) to grab attention; and (3) used a humorous sarcastic tone. In Phase 3, we tested the campaign messages (17 intervention and six control) with a nationally representative online survey (N = 1,636). Participants rated intervention and control messages highly with few differences between them. Exposure to messages resulted in significant increases in all risk beliefs from pre to post (p < 0.05). For WT, intervention messages increased beliefs about addiction more than control messages (p < 0.05). This systematic, iterative approach resulted in messages that show promise for discouraging WT and cigarillo use.
青少年和年轻人吸食水烟烟草(WT)和小雪茄,至少部分原因是基于错误的信念,即这些产品比香烟更安全。为了解决这一挑战,我们采用了系统的、分三个阶段的方法,制定了一项健康传播运动,以劝阻有风险的(烟草使用者和易受影响的非使用者)16 至 25 岁人群吸食 WT 和小雪茄。在第一阶段,我们使用全国电话调查(N=896)来确定突出的信息信念。参与者报告说,产品散发的成分(即有害化学物质)令人担忧。在第二阶段,我们使用焦点小组(N=38)开发并评估了四个信息执行方案,这些方案在图像、语气和令人不快的产品方面有所不同,但都包含相同的成分。参与者对一个执行方案评价很高,这促使我们开发了一项运动,每个信息都包含以下内容:(1)识别烟雾中的一种烟草产品和成分;(2)包含含有该成分的令人不快产品的图像(如农药、汽油),以引起注意;(3)使用幽默讽刺的语气。在第三阶段,我们使用全国代表性的在线调查(N=1636)测试了运动信息(17 个干预信息和 6 个对照信息)。参与者对干预和对照信息的评价都很高,两者之间几乎没有差异。与干预信息相比,暴露于信息后,所有风险信念都显著增加(p<0.05)。对于 WT,干预信息增加了对成瘾的信念,而对照信息则没有(p<0.05)。这种系统的、迭代的方法产生了一些有希望的信息,可以用来劝阻吸食 WT 和小雪茄。