Suppr超能文献

视觉模拟量表与改良博格量表在运动时呼吸困难测量中的比较。

A comparison of the visual analogue scale and modified Borg scale for the measurement of dyspnoea during exercise.

作者信息

Wilson R C, Jones P W

机构信息

Department of Medicine 1, St George's Hospital Medical School, London.

出版信息

Clin Sci (Lond). 1989 Mar;76(3):277-82. doi: 10.1042/cs0760277.

Abstract
  1. The intensity of breathlessness during exercise was measured in ten normal subjects using a visual analogue scale (VAS) and a Borg scale to compare the use of the scales and their repeatability, both within the duration of a period of exercise and between tests. For each scale, subjects performed two exercise tests separated by a period of 2-6 weeks. Each exercise test consisted of two cycles of progressively increasing and decreasing workload. 2. All subjects felt confidently able to use both scales to quantify their feelings of breathlessness exclusively of other sensation. Equal preference was expressed for use of a particular scale. 3. With both scales there was a large intersubject variation in the relationship between dyspnoea score and minute ventilation (VE) (P less than 0.01), and in the range of the scale used. 4. There was a good correlation between the VAS and Borg scores at each level of VE (r2 = 0.71), but the VAS score was used over a wider range than the Borg score. 5. The relationship between VE and the dyspnoea score measured by the two techniques was predominantly linear. The mean r2 for VAS score/VE was 0.68 (SD 0.19) and for Borg score/VE the mean r2 was 0.75 (SD 0.13). 6. The relationships VAS score/VE and Borg score/VE were unaffected by the direction in which the workload was varied (P greater than 0.05). 7. VE, measured at each work rate, did not differ between the two cycles (P greater than 0.05) or between the 2 days (P greater than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
摘要
  1. 采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)和博格量表对10名正常受试者运动时的呼吸困难强度进行测量,以比较这两种量表的使用情况及其在运动期间和不同测试之间的重复性。对于每种量表,受试者进行两次运动测试,间隔2 - 6周。每次运动测试包括两个逐渐增加和减少工作量的周期。2. 所有受试者都自信地认为能够使用这两种量表专门量化他们的呼吸困难感受,而不受其他感觉影响。对于使用哪种特定量表,他们表达了同等的偏好。3. 两种量表在呼吸困难评分与分钟通气量(VE)之间的关系以及所使用量表的范围方面,受试者之间均存在较大差异(P小于0.01)。4. 在每个VE水平上,VAS和博格评分之间存在良好的相关性(r2 = 0.71),但VAS评分的使用范围比博格评分更广。5. VE与通过这两种技术测量的呼吸困难评分之间的关系主要呈线性。VAS评分/VE的平均r2为0.68(标准差0.19),博格评分/VE的平均r2为0.75(标准差0.13)。6. VAS评分/VE和博格评分/VE的关系不受工作量变化方向的影响(P大于0.05)。7. 在每个工作率下测量的VE,在两个周期之间(P大于0.05)或两天之间(P大于0.05)没有差异。(摘要截短为250字)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验