Centre National de Référence Francisella tularensis, Laboratoire de Bactériologie-Hygiène Hospitalière, Département des agents infectieux, Institut de Biologie et de Pathologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes, CS 10217, F-38043 Grenoble cedex 9, France.
Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, TIMC-IMAG, F-38000 Grenoble, France.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018 Mar 1;73(3):687-691. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx460.
To determine the in vitro susceptibility to 18 antibiotics of human strains of Francisella tularensis isolated in France between 2006 and 2016, to check the absence of acquired resistance and to evaluate potential therapeutic alternatives.
Fifty-nine clinically unrelated F. tularensis subsp. holarctica strains identified at the French National Reference Centre for Francisella as belonging to the phylogenetic subclade B.FTNF002-00 were used. MICs were determined in CAMHB medium supplemented with 2% PolyViteX®, using the CLSI broth microdilution method.
All strains were susceptible to fluoroquinolones (ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin and moxifloxacin; MIC range: 0.016-0.25 mg/L), aminoglycosides (gentamicin and tobramycin; MIC range: ≤0.03-0.25 mg/L), doxycycline (MIC range: 0.125-0.25 mg/L) and chloramphenicol (MIC range: 0.5-2 mg/L). The erythromycin MIC range (0.5-2 mg/L) confirmed that all isolates belonged to biovar I of F. tularensis subsp. holarctica. Azithromycin and telithromycin displayed lower MIC ranges (0.25-1 and 0.03-0.5 mg/L, respectively). The tigecycline MIC range (0.25-1 mg/L) was slightly higher than that of doxycycline. All strains were resistant to ampicillin, meropenem, daptomycin, clindamycin and linezolid.
F. tularensis strains isolated in France remain susceptible to antibiotic classes recommended for tularaemia treatment. Because fluoroquinolones display the lowest MIC90, have bactericidal activity and have lower therapeutic failure rates compared with doxycycline, they may be advocated as first-line treatment of mild cases of tularaemia, predominant in Europe. MIC data also indicate that azithromycin or telithromycin may be possible therapeutic options against biovar I strains from Western Europe in case of contraindication to first-line antibiotics.
确定 2006 年至 2016 年期间在法国分离的人类弗朗西斯菌属土拉菌的 18 种抗生素的体外敏感性,检查是否存在获得性耐药性,并评估潜在的治疗替代方案。
使用法国国家弗朗西斯菌属参考中心鉴定为属于系统发育亚群 B.FTNF002-00 的 59 株临床无关的弗朗西斯菌属土拉菌亚种冬青亚种菌株。使用 CLSI 肉汤微量稀释法,在补充有 2%PolyViteX®的 CAMHB 培养基中测定 MIC。
所有菌株均对氟喹诺酮类(氧氟沙星、环丙沙星、左氧氟沙星和莫西沙星;MIC 范围:0.016-0.25mg/L)、氨基糖苷类(庆大霉素和妥布霉素;MIC 范围:≤0.03-0.25mg/L)、强力霉素(MIC 范围:0.125-0.25mg/L)和氯霉素(MIC 范围:0.5-2mg/L)敏感。红霉素的 MIC 范围(0.5-2mg/L)证实所有分离株均属于弗朗西斯菌属土拉菌亚种 I 生物型。阿奇霉素和替考拉宁的 MIC 范围分别为(0.25-1mg/L 和 0.03-0.5mg/L)较低。替加环素的 MIC 范围(0.25-1mg/L)略高于强力霉素。所有菌株均对氨苄西林、美罗培南、达托霉素、克林霉素和利奈唑胺耐药。
在法国分离的弗朗西斯菌属菌株对推荐用于土拉菌病治疗的抗生素类别仍保持敏感性。由于氟喹诺酮类药物的 MIC90 最低,具有杀菌活性,与强力霉素相比治疗失败率较低,因此它们可能被推荐作为欧洲主要为轻症土拉菌病的一线治疗药物。MIC 数据还表明,在对一线抗生素有禁忌症的情况下,阿奇霉素或替考拉宁可能是针对西欧 I 生物型菌株的治疗选择。