Caspar Yvan, Maurin Max
Laboratoire de Bactériologie-Hygiène Hospitalière, Département des agents infectieux, Centre National de Référence des Francisella, Institut de Biologie et de Pathologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble AlpesGrenoble, France.
Université Grenoble Alpes, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, TIMC-IMAGGrenoble, France.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017 Apr 11;7:122. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00122. eCollection 2017.
The antibiotic classes that are recommended for tularaemia treatment are the aminoglycosides, the fluoroquinolones and the tetracyclines. However, cure rates vary between 60 and 100% depending on the antibiotic used, the time to appropriate antibiotic therapy setup and its duration, and the presence of complications, such as lymph node suppuration. Thus, antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) of strains remains of primary importance for detection of the emergence of antibiotic resistances to first-line drugs, and to test new therapeutic alternatives. However, the AST methods reported in the literature were poorly standardized between studies and AST data have not been previously evaluated in a comprehensive and comparative way. The aim of the present review was to summarize experimental data on antibiotic susceptibilities of obtained in acellular media, cell models and animal models since the introduction of fluoroquinolones in the treatment of tularaemia in 1989. We compiled MIC data of 33 antibiotics (including aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, tetracyclines, macrolides, β-lactams, chloramphenicol, rifampicin, and linezolid) against 900 strains (504 human strains), including 107 subsp. (type A), 789 subsp. (type B) and four subsp. strains, using various AST methods. Specific culture media were identified or confirmed as unsuitable for AST of . Overall, MICs were the lowest for ciprofloxacin (≤ 0.002-0.125 mg/L) and levofloxacin, and ranged from ≤ 0.016 to 2 mg/L for gentamicin, and 0.064 to 4 mg/L for doxycycline. No resistant strain to any of these antibiotics was reported. Fluoroquinolones also exhibited a bactericidal activity against intracellular and lower relapse rates in animal models when compared with the bacteriostatic compound doxycycline. As expected, lower MIC values were found for macrolides against type A and biovar I type B strains, compared to biovar II type B strains. The macrolides were more effective against grown in phagocytic cells than in acellular media.
推荐用于兔热病治疗的抗生素类别为氨基糖苷类、氟喹诺酮类和四环素类。然而,治愈率在60%至100%之间变化,这取决于所使用的抗生素、开始适当抗生素治疗的时间及其持续时间,以及是否存在并发症,如淋巴结化脓。因此,对菌株进行抗生素敏感性测试(AST)对于检测对一线药物的抗生素耐药性的出现以及测试新的治疗选择仍然至关重要。然而,文献中报道的AST方法在不同研究之间标准化程度较差,并且AST数据此前尚未得到全面和比较性的评估。本综述的目的是总结自1989年氟喹诺酮类药物用于兔热病治疗以来,在无细胞培养基、细胞模型和动物模型中获得的关于抗生素敏感性的实验数据。我们使用各种AST方法汇编了33种抗生素(包括氨基糖苷类、氟喹诺酮类、四环素类、大环内酯类、β-内酰胺类、氯霉素、利福平及利奈唑胺)针对900株兔热病菌株(504株人类菌株)的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)数据,其中包括107株土拉弗朗西斯菌亚种(A型)、789株土拉弗朗西斯菌亚种(B型)和4株土拉弗朗西斯菌亚种菌株。已确定或证实特定培养基不适用于兔热病菌株的AST。总体而言,环丙沙星(≤0.002 - 0.125mg/L)和左氧氟沙星的MIC最低,庆大霉素的MIC范围为≤0.016至2mg/L,多西环素的MIC范围为0.064至4mg/L。未报告对这些抗生素中的任何一种耐药的菌株。与抑菌性化合物多西环素相比,氟喹诺酮类在动物模型中对细胞内兔热病菌也表现出杀菌活性且复发率较低。正如预期的那样,与生物变种II型B菌株相比,大环内酯类对A型和生物变种I型B菌株的MIC值更低。大环内酯类对在吞噬细胞中生长的兔热病菌比对在无细胞培养基中生长的更有效。