Departments of Geriatrics, Gerontology and Psychology, New Jersey Institute for Successful Aging, Rowan University-School of Osteopathic Medicine, Stratford, NJ, USA.
Department of Behavioral Sciences and the Rush Alzheimer's Disease Center, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;61(3):917-928. doi: 10.3233/JAD-170555.
Working memory (WM) is often assessed with serial order tests such as repeating digits backward. In prior dementia research using the Backward Digit Span Test (BDT), only aggregate test performance was examined.
The current research tallied primacy/recency effects, out-of-sequence transposition errors, perseverations, and omissions to assess WM deficits in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI).
Memory clinic patients (n = 66) were classified into three groups: single domain amnestic MCI (aMCI), combined mixed domain/dysexecutive MCI (mixed/dys MCI), and non-MCI where patients did not meet criteria for MCI. Serial order/WM ability was assessed by asking participants to repeat 7 trials of five digits backwards. Serial order position accuracy, transposition errors, perseverations, and omission errors were tallied.
A 3 (group)×5 (serial position) repeated measures ANOVA yielded a significant group×trial interaction. Follow-up analyses found attenuation of the recency effect for mixed/dys MCI patients. Mixed/dys MCI patients scored lower than non-MCI patients for serial position 3 (p < 0.003) serial position 4 (p < 0.002); and lower than both group for serial position 5 (recency; p < 0.002). Mixed/dys MCI patients also produced more transposition errors than both groups (p < 0.010); and more omissions (p < 0.020), and perseverations errors (p < 0.018) than non-MCI patients.
The attenuation of a recency effect using serial order parameters obtained from the BDT may provide a useful operational definition as well as additional diagnostic information regarding working memory deficits in MCI.
工作记忆(WM)通常通过序列顺序测试进行评估,例如倒背数字。在先前使用倒背数字广度测试(BDT)的痴呆症研究中,仅检查了综合测试性能。
当前研究通过计算首位/近因效应、非顺序转位错误、持续和遗漏,来评估轻度认知障碍(MCI)患者的 WM 缺陷。
记忆诊所患者(n=66)分为三组:单一域遗忘型 MCI(aMCI)、混合域/执行功能障碍型 MCI(混合/dys MCI)和非 MCI,患者不符合 MCI 标准。通过要求参与者倒背 7 次 5 位数字来评估序列顺序/WM 能力。计算序列顺序位置准确性、转位错误、持续和遗漏错误。
3(组)×5(序列位置)重复测量方差分析得出了显著的组×试验交互作用。后续分析发现混合/dys MCI 患者的近因效应减弱。混合/dys MCI 患者在序列位置 3(p<0.003)和序列位置 4(p<0.002)上的得分低于非 MCI 患者;在序列位置 5(近因)上的得分也低于两组(p<0.002)。混合/dys MCI 患者的转位错误也多于两组(p<0.010);遗漏(p<0.020)和持续(p<0.018)错误也多于非 MCI 患者。
使用 BDT 获得的序列顺序参数衰减的近因效应可能为 MCI 的工作记忆缺陷提供有用的操作定义以及额外的诊断信息。