School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia.
Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, NSW 2305, Australia.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Dec 16;14(12):1585. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14121585.
Clinicians often ask pregnant women about tobacco smoking, but their practices of asking about other smoking and nicotine exposures are unknown. This study analysed how often clinicians ask pregnant women about their use of e-cigarettes, cannabis, chewing tobacco, and second-hand smoke (SHS) exposure. Two cross-sectional surveys were undertaken. A random sample of 500 General Practitioner (GP) members were invited from the National Faculty of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health (NFATSIH) to complete an on-line survey, and 5571 GP and Obstetrician (OBS) members of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG) were sent a paper survey by mail. Questions on frequency of asking about the exposures used Likert Scales, later dichotomized to "often-always" and "never-sometimes". Logistic regressions estimated associations between clinician type and asking about cannabis, e-cigarettes, chewing tobacco, and SHS. An adjusted model reduced potential confounders of location, guidelines, gender and population. = 378 GPs and OBS participated (6.2% response). In total, 13-14% asked "often-always" about e-cigarettes; 58% cannabis; 38% cannabis with tobacco; 27% SHS, and 10% chewing tobacco-compared to 95% of the sample asking about cigarette smoking. After adjustment, the odds of RANZCOG GPs (OR 0.34) and OBS (OR 0.63) asking about cannabis were lower compared to NFATSIH GPs. Clinician type was non-significant for asking about e-cigarettes, chewing tobacco and SHS. Surveyed Australian GPs and obstetricians asked less frequently about e-cigarettes, chewing, SHS exposure, and cannabis, potentially missing important exposures for mother and child.
临床医生经常询问孕妇有关吸烟的情况,但他们询问其他吸烟和尼古丁暴露情况的做法尚不清楚。本研究分析了临床医生询问孕妇使用电子烟、大麻、咀嚼烟草和二手烟(SHS)暴露情况的频率。进行了两项横断面调查。从国家原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民健康学院(NFATSIH)随机抽取 500 名全科医生(GP)成员参加在线调查,向皇家澳大利亚和新西兰妇产科医师学院(RANZCOG)的 5571 名 GP 和妇产科医生(OBS)成员邮寄纸质调查。关于询问暴露情况的频率问题使用了李克特量表,后来将其分为“经常-总是”和“从不-有时”。逻辑回归估计了医生类型与询问大麻、电子烟、咀嚼烟草和 SHS 之间的关联。调整后的模型减少了位置、指南、性别和人群等潜在混杂因素的影响。共有 378 名 GP 和 OBS 参与(6.2%的应答率)。总的来说,13-14%的人经常询问电子烟;58%的人询问大麻;38%的人询问大麻和烟草;27%的人询问 SHS,10%的人询问咀嚼烟草-而 95%的样本询问香烟吸烟情况。调整后,与 NFATSIH 的 GP 相比,RANZCOG 的 GP(OR 0.34)和 OBS(OR 0.63)询问大麻的可能性较低。询问电子烟、咀嚼烟草和 SHS 的可能性与医生类型无关。调查的澳大利亚全科医生和妇产科医生询问电子烟、咀嚼、SHS 暴露和大麻的频率较低,可能会错过母婴重要的暴露情况。