• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

你说得倒是轻松:动作识别和言语流畅性。

That's easy for you to say: action identification and speech fluency.

作者信息

Vallacher R R, Wegner D M, Somoza M P

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton 33431-0991.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989 Feb;56(2):199-208. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.56.2.199.

DOI:10.1037//0022-3514.56.2.199
PMID:2926623
Abstract

Action identification theory holds that an action can be identified by the performer in different ways, and that these various act identities differ in their appropriateness for maintaining the action effectively. Optimal action identification exists when a personally easy action is identified in relatively high-level terms (i.e., the action's effects and implications) or a personally difficult action is identified in relatively low-level terms (i.e., the action's mechanical details). To test the optimality hypothesis with respect to speech fluency, subjects were asked to deliver a speech to either an easy-to-persuade audience or a difficult-to-persuade audience and induced to think about the action in either high-level or low-level terms. As predicted, subjects made fewer speech errors and felt more satisfied with their performance when the task was personally easy and identified at high level and when the task was personally difficult and identified at low level. Optimal action identification made things easier for them to say.

摘要

行动识别理论认为,行动者可以通过不同方式识别一个行动,而且这些不同的行动身份在有效维持该行动的适宜性方面存在差异。当一个对个人来说容易的行动以相对高层次的术语(即行动的效果和影响)来识别,或者一个对个人来说困难的行动以相对低层次的术语(即行动的机械细节)来识别时,就存在最佳行动识别。为了检验关于言语流畅性的最佳性假设,要求受试者向易于说服的听众或难以说服的听众发表演讲,并诱导他们从高层次或低层次的角度思考该行动。正如预测的那样,当任务对个人来说容易且从高层次识别,以及当任务对个人来说困难且从低层次识别时,受试者出现的言语错误更少,并且对自己的表现更满意。最佳行动识别让他们更容易表达。

相似文献

1
That's easy for you to say: action identification and speech fluency.你说得倒是轻松:动作识别和言语流畅性。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989 Feb;56(2):199-208. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.56.2.199.
2
The kinesthetic speaker. Putting action into words.动觉型演讲者。将行动转化为言语。
Harv Bus Rev. 2001 Apr;79(4):112-20, 169.
3
Improving patient care and quality of life after laryngectomy/glossectomy.改善喉切除术/舌切除术患者的护理及生活质量。
Br J Nurs. 2005;14(12):634-40. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2005.14.12.18283.
4
What patients say and what they mean.患者所言与所指。
Am J Psychother. 1971 Jul;25(3):428-36. doi: 10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.1971.25.3.428.
5
How to become an authentic speaker. Even sincere speeches often come across as contrived. A four-step process will help you create a true emotional connection with your audience.如何成为一名真诚的演讲者。即使是真诚的演讲往往也会给人一种做作的感觉。一个四步流程将帮助你与听众建立真正的情感联系。
Harv Bus Rev. 2008 Nov;86(11):115-9, 138.
6
Cognitive task demands and discourse performance after traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤后的认知任务需求与话语表现
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2017 Jul;52(4):501-513. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12289. Epub 2016 Nov 27.
7
Coping: 'relax? That's easy for you to say!'.应对方式:“放松?你说得倒轻巧!”
RN. 1980 Jun;43(6):34, 75-80.
8
Selling the brand inside.在内部推广品牌。
Harv Bus Rev. 2002 Jan;80(1):99-101, 103-5, 126.
9
Carry-over fluency induced by extreme prolongations: A new behavioral paradigm.极端延长诱发的延续流畅性:一种新的行为范式。
Med Hypotheses. 2016 Apr;89:102-6. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2016.02.013. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
10
Communicating with the crowd: speakers use abstract messages when addressing larger audiences.与人群交流:演讲者在向更大的听众发表讲话时会使用抽象的信息。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Feb;143(1):351-62. doi: 10.1037/a0032413. Epub 2013 Apr 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Age-related differences in the weighting of kinematic and contextual information during action prediction.动作预测过程中运动学信息与情境信息加权的年龄差异
Front Aging Neurosci. 2025 Aug 18;17:1622569. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2025.1622569. eCollection 2025.
2
Cognitive abstraction increases prosociality when loyalty is valued lowly, but decreases prosociality when loyalty is valued highly.当忠诚度被轻视时,认知抽象会增加亲社会行为,但当忠诚度被高度重视时,认知抽象会减少亲社会行为。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 4;15(1):23869. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-09158-w.
3
Managing university crises through psychological distance and information strategies.
通过心理距离和信息策略应对大学危机。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 2;15(1):22579. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-07307-9.
4
Shifting narrative perspective and construal level shape emotional response and enhance eudaimonic well-being.转变叙事视角和解释水平会塑造情绪反应并提升幸福感。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jun 5;15(1):19778. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-01946-8.
5
Microfoundations of sensing capabilities: From managerial cognition to team behavior.感知能力的微观基础:从管理认知到团队行为
Strateg Organ. 2025 May;23(2):167-194. doi: 10.1177/14761270221142959. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
6
The Role of Abstraction: Construal Level Can Improve Adolescents' Idea Selection in the Domain of Social Creativity.抽象的作用:解释水平能够改善青少年在社会创造力领域的创意选择。
J Intell. 2025 Mar 5;13(3):31. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence13030031.
7
The Wise Mind Balances the Abstract and the Concrete.明智的头脑平衡抽象与具体。
Open Mind (Camb). 2024 Jun 28;8:826-858. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00149. eCollection 2024.
8
A step-by-step method for cultural annotation by LLMs.一种由大语言模型进行文化注释的循序渐进的方法。
Front Artif Intell. 2024 May 1;7:1365508. doi: 10.3389/frai.2024.1365508. eCollection 2024.
9
"It doesn't matter if you are in charge of the trees, you always miss the trees for the forest": Power and the illusion of explanatory depth.“只见树木,不见森林”:权力与解释深度的幻觉。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 16;19(4):e0297850. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297850. eCollection 2024.
10
To each their own: a review of individual differences and metaphorical perspectives on time.因人而异:关于时间的个体差异与隐喻视角综述
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 10;14:1213719. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1213719. eCollection 2023.