• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抽象的作用:解释水平能够改善青少年在社会创造力领域的创意选择。

The Role of Abstraction: Construal Level Can Improve Adolescents' Idea Selection in the Domain of Social Creativity.

作者信息

Li Chun, Feng Shuo, Zhang Yue, Peng Hui, Ma Xiaoqing

机构信息

School of Education Science, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, China.

School of Psychology, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250358, China.

出版信息

J Intell. 2025 Mar 5;13(3):31. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence13030031.

DOI:10.3390/jintelligence13030031
PMID:40137063
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11943103/
Abstract

Creative idea selection is an important part of the creative process, but the current research on creative idea selection has not attracted enough attention, and this lack is particularly evident in the research on creativity focusing on adolescents. In view of this, in this study, centered on the creative process, we delved into the effect of the construal level on adolescents' creative idea selection and whether there were domain differences in this effect. The effect of trait-level construals in the general and social creative domains on creative idea selection was examined in Study 1. The results showed that (1) the creativity of the ideas selected by adolescents with high trait-level construals was higher than that of those with low trait-level construals; (2) the creativity and novelty of idea selection in the social creative domain were significantly lower than those in the general creative domain of adolescents. To determine the consistency and stability of the effects of construal level on creative idea selection, Study 2 distinguished between high and low construal levels on the basis of state initiation. It was demonstrated that (1) the creativity and applicability scores for the idea selection of adolescents with high state-level construals were higher than those of adolescents with low state-level construals; (2) the overall creativity and novelty of adolescents' idea selection in the social creative domain were significantly lower than those in the general creative domain. On the basis of the above results, the following conclusions were drawn in this study: (1) the overall creativity and novelty of adolescents' idea selection in the social creative domain are lower than those in the general creative domain, but there are inconsistent results with respect to applicability; (2) both high trait- and state-level construals can promote the creativity and novelty of adolescents' social creative idea selection.

摘要

创意想法选择是创意过程的重要组成部分,但目前关于创意想法选择的研究尚未引起足够的关注,这种不足在以青少年为重点的创造力研究中尤为明显。有鉴于此,在本研究中,我们以创意过程为中心,深入探讨了解构水平对青少年创意想法选择的影响以及这种影响是否存在领域差异。研究1考察了一般和社会创意领域中特质水平的构念对创意想法选择的影响。结果表明:(1)特质水平构念高的青少年所选择想法的创造力高于特质水平构念低的青少年;(2)青少年在社会创意领域的想法选择的创造力和新颖性显著低于其在一般创意领域的想法选择。为了确定构念水平对创意想法选择影响的一致性和稳定性,研究2在状态启动的基础上区分了高、低构念水平。结果表明:(1)状态水平构念高的青少年想法选择的创造力和适用性得分高于状态水平构念低的青少年;(2)青少年在社会创意领域的想法选择的整体创造力和新颖性显著低于其在一般创意领域的想法选择。基于上述结果,本研究得出以下结论:(1)青少年在社会创意领域的想法选择的整体创造力和新颖性低于其在一般创意领域的想法选择,但在适用性方面存在不一致的结果;(2)特质水平和状态水平的高构念都能促进青少年社会创意想法选择的创造力和新颖性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4ae/11943103/263b52b0db74/jintelligence-13-00031-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4ae/11943103/c2847b7f66a4/jintelligence-13-00031-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4ae/11943103/3e176fb1a6ed/jintelligence-13-00031-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4ae/11943103/92fd9dbeb578/jintelligence-13-00031-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4ae/11943103/8a606cebad63/jintelligence-13-00031-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4ae/11943103/bbfb1930c19e/jintelligence-13-00031-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4ae/11943103/263b52b0db74/jintelligence-13-00031-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4ae/11943103/c2847b7f66a4/jintelligence-13-00031-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4ae/11943103/3e176fb1a6ed/jintelligence-13-00031-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4ae/11943103/92fd9dbeb578/jintelligence-13-00031-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4ae/11943103/8a606cebad63/jintelligence-13-00031-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4ae/11943103/bbfb1930c19e/jintelligence-13-00031-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4ae/11943103/263b52b0db74/jintelligence-13-00031-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
The Role of Abstraction: Construal Level Can Improve Adolescents' Idea Selection in the Domain of Social Creativity.抽象的作用:解释水平能够改善青少年在社会创造力领域的创意选择。
J Intell. 2025 Mar 5;13(3):31. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence13030031.
2
Greater psychological distance, better creative-idea selection: the mediating role of construal level.心理距离越大,创意选择越好:解释水平的中介作用
BMC Psychol. 2025 Feb 18;13(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02370-3.
3
The effects of social comparison and self-construal on creative idea generation: An EEG study.社会比较和自我构念对创意想法生成的影响:一项 EEG 研究。
Behav Brain Res. 2023 Jan 5;436:114084. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2022.114084. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
4
Addiction-Prone Personality and Creative Cognitive Styles: A Moderated Mediation Model of Novelty Seeking and Depression Tendency.易成瘾人格与创造性认知风格:寻求新奇和抑郁倾向的调节中介模型
Psychol Rep. 2024 Jun;127(3):1214-1236. doi: 10.1177/00332941221137239. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
5
The creative cliff illusion.创造性悬崖错觉。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Aug 18;117(33):19830-19836. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2005620117. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
6
Self-construals moderate associations between trait creativity and social brain network.自我建构调节特质创造力与社会脑网络之间的关联。
Neuropsychologia. 2018 Mar;111:284-291. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.02.012. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
7
The creative brain in the figural domain: Distinct patterns of EEG alpha power during idea generation and idea elaboration.在图形领域中的创造性大脑:在创意生成和创意阐述期间 EEG 阿尔法功率的独特模式。
Neuropsychologia. 2018 Sep;118(Pt A):13-19. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.02.013. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
8
Conflict side of creativity: Role of supervisory support and team affective tone in facilitating creative idea validation.创造力的冲突面:监管支持和团队情感氛围在促进创意想法验证方面的作用。
Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 20;10:965278. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.965278. eCollection 2022.
9
How subjective idea valuation energizes and guides creative idea generation.主观观念评估如何激发和引导创意产生。
Am Psychol. 2024 Apr;79(3):403-422. doi: 10.1037/amp0001165. Epub 2023 Aug 14.
10
Default and executive networks' roles in diverse adolescents' emotionally engaged construals of complex social issues.默认网络和执行网络在不同青少年对复杂社会问题情绪投入的构建中的作用。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2022 Apr 1;17(4):421-429. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsab108.

本文引用的文献

1
Can the Effect of Problem Solvers' Characteristics on Adolescents' Cooperative Problem Solving Ability Be Improved by Group Sizes?问题解决者特征对青少年合作解决问题能力的影响能否通过小组规模来改善?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 9;19(24):16575. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416575.
2
Construal level shifts integration and segregation of the brain network.构建层次转变整合和大脑网络的分离。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020 Feb;149(2):382-390. doi: 10.1037/xge0000637. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
3
Which construal level combinations generate the most effective interventions? A field experiment on energy conservation.
哪种构建水平组合能产生最有效的干预措施?关于节能的现场实验。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 17;14(1):e0209469. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209469. eCollection 2019.
4
Abstractness and Messages Describing Consequences Promote Healthier Behavioral Intentions.抽象性和描述后果的信息能促进更健康的行为意向。
J Psychol. 2018;152(7):515-527. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2018.1486801. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
5
The Role of Intuition in the Generation and Evaluation Stages of Creativity.直觉在创造力的产生和评估阶段中的作用。
Front Psychol. 2016 Sep 20;7:1420. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01420. eCollection 2016.
6
Brain mechanisms associated with internally directed attention and self-generated thought.与内源性注意力和自我产生的思维相关的脑机制。
Sci Rep. 2016 Mar 10;6:22959. doi: 10.1038/srep22959.
7
Communicating with the crowd: speakers use abstract messages when addressing larger audiences.与人群交流:演讲者在向更大的听众发表讲话时会使用抽象的信息。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Feb;143(1):351-62. doi: 10.1037/a0032413. Epub 2013 Apr 1.
8
Construal Levels and Psychological Distance: Effects on Representation, Prediction, Evaluation, and Behavior.解释水平与心理距离:对表征、预测、评估及行为的影响
J Consum Psychol. 2007;17(2):83-95. doi: 10.1016/S1057-7408(07)70013-X.
9
The strength-of-weak-ties perspective on creativity: a comprehensive examination and extension.弱关系视角下的创造力:全面的检验与拓展。
J Appl Psychol. 2010 May;95(3):592-601. doi: 10.1037/a0018761.
10
Construal-level theory of psychological distance.心理距离的构建层次理论。
Psychol Rev. 2010 Apr;117(2):440-63. doi: 10.1037/a0018963.