Oberste Max, Hartig Philipp, Bloch Wilhelm, Elsner Benjamin, Predel Hans-Georg, Ernst Bernhard, Zimmer Philipp
Department of Molecular and Cellular Sports Medicine, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Department of Circulation Research and Cellular Sports Medicine, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Dec 8;11:600. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00600. eCollection 2017.
Many studies report improvements in cognitive performance following acute endurance exercise compared to control group treatment. These cognitive benefits are interpreted as a result of a physiological response to exercise. However, it was also hypothesized that expectation-driven placebo effects account for these positive effects. The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences between expectations for cognitive benefits toward acute endurance exercise and multiple control group treatments. Healthy individuals ( = 247, 24.26 ± 3.88 years) were randomized to eight different groups watching videos of a moderate, a vigorous exercise treatment or one control group treatment (waiting, reading, video-watching, stretching, myofascial release workout, and very light exercise). Then, they were introduced to three commonly used cognitive test procedures in acute exercise-cognition research (Stroop-test, Trail-Making-test, Free-recall-task). Participants rated the effect they would expect on their performance in those tasks, if they had received the treatment shortly before the task, on an 11-point Likert scale. No significantly different expectations for cognitive benefits toward acute moderate exercise and control group treatments could be revealed. Participants expected significantly worse performance following vigorous exercise compared to following waiting and stretching for all cognitive tests. Significantly worse performance after vigorous exercise compared to after very light exercise was expected for Stroop and Free-recall. For Free-recall, participants expected worse performance after vigorous exercise compared to myofascial release training as well. Our results indicate that expectation-driven placebo effects are unlikely to cause the reported greater cognitive improvements following acute moderate and vigorous endurance exercise compared to following common control group treatments.
许多研究报告称,与对照组治疗相比,急性耐力运动后认知表现有所改善。这些认知益处被解释为运动生理反应的结果。然而,也有人假设,期望驱动的安慰剂效应是这些积极效果的原因。本研究的目的是调查对急性耐力运动与多个对照组治疗的认知益处期望之间的差异。健康个体(n = 247,24.26±3.88岁)被随机分为八个不同组,观看中等强度、高强度运动治疗或一个对照组治疗(等待、阅读、观看视频、伸展、肌筋膜放松训练和极轻度运动)的视频。然后,他们被介绍了急性运动-认知研究中常用的三种认知测试程序(斯特鲁普测试、连线测试、自由回忆任务)。参与者在11点李克特量表上对如果在任务前不久接受了治疗,他们期望该治疗对自己在这些任务中的表现产生的影响进行评分。未发现对急性中等强度运动与对照组治疗的认知益处期望有显著差异。对于所有认知测试,与等待和伸展相比,参与者预计高强度运动后的表现会明显更差。对于斯特鲁普测试和自由回忆任务,预计高强度运动后的表现比极轻度运动后明显更差。对于自由回忆任务,参与者预计高强度运动后的表现也比肌筋膜放松训练后更差。我们的结果表明,与常见对照组治疗相比,期望驱动的安慰剂效应不太可能导致报告的急性中等强度和高强度耐力运动后更大的认知改善。