Suppr超能文献

患者及公众参与健康素养干预措施:一项映射综述

Patient and public involvement in health literacy interventions: a mapping review.

作者信息

Howard Wilsher Stephanie, Brainard Julii, Loke Yoon, Salter Charlotte

机构信息

Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ UK.

出版信息

Res Involv Engagem. 2017 Dec 20;3:31. doi: 10.1186/s40900-017-0081-z. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

PLAIN ENGLISH SUMMARY

If people can read, understand and act on health information to better their health and reduce illness, they are thought to have "adequate" health literacy. Poor health literacy can mean people are less able to access health care and manage their health. Health literacy tends to worsen as adults get older, and is especially poor in adults age 65 and over. Ideally, health literacy interventions target people before age 65, to establish good skills and habits before people have many health problems associated with ageing. It is also good if researchers consult ordinary people, including patients and the public (PPI) when planning a programme to try to improve health literacy. This may help ensure individual needs are catered for.We therefore looked for studies that described any role of patient or public representatives in the research planning stages. We explored how the representatives contributed to each project. We found only 20 studies that included people other than the research team. Lack of reporting and consultation with patient and public representatives may contribute to less success when public health programmes are undertaken.

BACKGROUND

Health literacy is the ability to understand, access and use health care and is a critical mediating factor that affects the health of older adults. Patient and public involvement in health and social care research, policy and design of care delivery is one mechanism that can promote production of better health literacy. This mapping review looks for and describes practices, concepts and methods that have been reported involving patients and public in the development and design of health literacy interventions for older people.

METHODS

Studies for the present review were selected from an inventory of health behaviour studies published between 2003 and 2013. The inventory was created by systematic searches on bibliographic databases (Medline, CINAHL, Scopus, Google) for health literacy interventions involving older people (50+ years) and resulted in screening of 5561 articles, of which 1097 met study inclusion criteria. For the research described in this article 96 of the 1097 studies specifically focused on health literacy and were independently screened by two reviewers to assess involvement of stakeholders other than investigators and participants.

RESULTS

Twenty studies included patient and/or public involvement in at least one research domain: design, management or evaluation. Involvement included volunteers, older people, patients, and/or community representatives.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient and public involvement were rarely reported in studies on health literacy interventions for older people. Future intervention development needs high quality PPI, which is well reported to develop the evidence base and inform practice.

摘要

通俗易懂的总结

如果人们能够阅读、理解健康信息并据此采取行动以改善健康状况和减少疾病,那么他们就被认为具有“足够的”健康素养。健康素养低下可能意味着人们获得医疗保健和管理自身健康的能力较差。随着成年人年龄的增长,健康素养往往会变差,在65岁及以上的成年人中尤其差。理想情况下,健康素养干预措施应针对65岁以下的人群,以便在人们出现许多与衰老相关的健康问题之前就培养良好的技能和习惯。如果研究人员在规划旨在提高健康素养的项目时咨询普通人,包括患者和公众(PPI),这也是有益的。这可能有助于确保满足个人需求。因此,我们寻找了描述患者或公众代表在研究规划阶段所起任何作用的研究。我们探讨了这些代表如何为每个项目做出贡献。我们仅发现20项研究纳入了研究团队以外的人员。缺乏对患者和公众代表的报告及咨询可能导致开展公共卫生项目时成功率较低。

背景

健康素养是理解、获取和使用医疗保健的能力,是影响老年人健康的关键中介因素。患者和公众参与健康与社会护理研究、政策制定以及护理服务设计是促进产生更好健康素养的一种机制。本映射综述旨在寻找并描述在为老年人开发和设计健康素养干预措施过程中涉及患者和公众的已报道的实践、概念和方法。

方法

本次综述的研究是从2003年至2013年发表的健康行为研究清单中选取的。该清单是通过对书目数据库(Medline、CINAHL、Scopus、谷歌)进行系统检索,以查找涉及老年人(50岁及以上)的健康素养干预措施而创建的,共筛选出5561篇文章,其中1097篇符合研究纳入标准。对于本文所述的研究,1097项研究中有96项专门关注健康素养,并由两名评审员独立筛选,以评估调查人员和参与者以外的利益相关者的参与情况。

结果

20项研究纳入了患者和/或公众在至少一个研究领域的参与:设计、管理或评估。参与人员包括志愿者、老年人、患者和/或社区代表。

结论

在针对老年人的健康素养干预措施研究中,很少有关于患者和公众参与的报道。未来的干预措施开发需要高质量的患者和公众参与,并且要有充分的报道,以建立证据基础并为实践提供参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5260/5738234/9c2614df383f/40900_2017_81_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验