Suppr超能文献

三种不同地区伊蚊采样方法的对比评估——印度尼西亚。

Comparative evaluation of anopheline sampling methods in three localities in Indonesia.

机构信息

Eck Institute for Global Health, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA.

National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.

出版信息

Malar J. 2018 Jan 8;17(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12936-017-2161-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of vector control efforts can vary based on the interventions used and local mosquito behaviour and adaptability. In many settings, biting patterns of Anopheles mosquitoes can shift in response to interventions targeting indoor-biting mosquitoes, often resulting in higher proportions of mosquitoes feeding outside or at times when people are not protected. These behaviourally resistant mosquitoes have been shown to sustain residual malaria transmission and limit control efforts. Therefore, it is important to accurately sample mosquitoes to understand their behaviour.

METHODS

A variety of traps were evaluated in three geographically diverse sites in malaria-endemic Indonesia to investigate local mosquito feeding behaviour and determine effective traps for surveillance.

RESULTS

Eight traps were evaluated in three sites: Canti village, Lampung, Kaliharjo village, Purworejo, and Saketa village, Halmahera, Indonesia, including the gold standard human landing collection (HLC) and a variety of traps targeting host-seeking and resting mosquitoes both indoors and outdoors. Trapping, using indoor and outdoor HLC, the Ifakara tent trap C, goat and human-occupied tents, resting pots and boxes, and CDC miniature light traps was conducted for 16 nights in two sites and 8 nights in a third site, using a Latin square design. Trap efficacy varied by site, with outdoor HLC yielding the highest catch rates in Canti and Kaliharjo and a goat-baited tent trap proving most effective in Saketa. In Canti village, anthropophilic Anopheles sundaicus were caught indoors and outdoors using HLCs, peaking in the early morning. In Kaliharjo, a variety of mosquitoes were caught, mostly outdoors throughout the night. HLC was ineffective in Saketa, the only site where a goat-baited tent trap was tested. This trap was effective in catching zoophilic vectors outdoors before midnight.

CONCLUSIONS

Different trapping methods were suitable for different species, likely reflecting differences in behaviour among species. The three villages, each located on a different island in the Indonesian archipelago, contained mosquito populations with unique behaviours. These data suggest that the effectiveness of specific vector monitoring and control measures may vary by location.

摘要

背景

基于所采用的干预措施以及当地蚊虫行为和适应性,病媒控制工作的效果可能会有所不同。在许多环境中,针对室内叮咬蚊虫的干预措施可能会导致按蚊的叮咬模式发生变化,通常会导致更多比例的蚊虫在户外或人们未受保护的时间进食。这些具有行为抗性的蚊虫已被证明能够维持疟疾的残留传播,并限制控制工作的效果。因此,准确采样蚊虫以了解其行为非常重要。

方法

在印度尼西亚三个地理上不同的疟疾流行地区评估了多种诱捕器,以研究当地蚊虫的觅食行为,并确定用于监测的有效诱捕器。

结果

在印度尼西亚的三个地点评估了 8 种诱捕器:楠榜的 Canti 村、普沃勒佐的 Kaliharjo 村和哈马黑拉的 Saketa 村,包括金标准的人诱捕采集(HLC)和针对室内和室外的宿主寻找和栖息蚊虫的多种诱捕器。在两个地点进行了 16 晚的诱捕,在第三个地点进行了 8 晚的诱捕,使用了室内和室外 HLC、Ifakara 帐篷诱捕器 C、山羊和有人居住的帐篷、栖息盆和盒以及 CDC 微型灯诱捕器,使用拉丁方设计。诱捕器的效果因地点而异,在 Canti 和 Kaliharjo 中,户外 HLC 的捕获率最高,而在 Saketa 中,山羊诱捕的帐篷诱捕器效果最佳。在 Canti 村,使用 HLC 在室内和室外捕获了嗜人按蚊,高峰出现在清晨。在 Kaliharjo,捕获了多种蚊虫,主要在夜间户外。HLC 在 Saketa 无效,这是唯一测试山羊诱捕的帐篷的地点。这种诱捕器在午夜前户外捕获了嗜兽媒介。

结论

不同的诱捕方法适用于不同的物种,这可能反映了物种之间行为的差异。这三个村庄位于印度尼西亚群岛的不同岛屿上,每个村庄都有具有独特行为的蚊虫种群。这些数据表明,特定病媒监测和控制措施的有效性可能因地点而异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ef4/5759267/f68514169003/12936_2017_2161_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验