• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

积极唤醒会增加个体对风险的偏好。

Positive Arousal Increases Individuals' Preferences for Risk.

作者信息

Galentino Andrea, Bonini Nicolao, Savadori Lucia

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Cognitive Sciences, University of Trento, Trento, Italy.

Fondazione Bruno Kessler, Trento, Italy.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2017 Dec 11;8:2142. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02142. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02142
PMID:29312030
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5732211/
Abstract

Much is known about the effect of negative arousal on decision making, but little is known about the effect of positive arousal. In this study, we manipulated positive arousal and measured individual choices under risk using an incentivized task. Participants were randomly assigned to either a low arousal or a high arousal condition and asked to choose between pairs of two-outcome monetary lotteries with the same expected value but different risk in terms of outcome variance. The probability was set at 50% for each lottery. Participants in the high arousal group selected the riskier lottery more often and took more time to make choices than participants in the low arousal group. This finding shows that introducing a pleasant arousing cue as part of the decision context shifts an individual's preferences toward the risky economic option and away from the safer one.

摘要

关于负面唤醒对决策的影响,我们了解很多,但对于正面唤醒的影响却知之甚少。在本研究中,我们操纵了正面唤醒,并使用一项激励任务来测量个体在风险情境下的选择。参与者被随机分配到低唤醒组或高唤醒组,并被要求在两组具有相同期望值但结果方差风险不同的双结果货币彩票中进行选择。每张彩票的概率设定为50%。高唤醒组的参与者比低唤醒组的参与者更频繁地选择风险更高的彩票,并且做出选择花费的时间更长。这一发现表明,在决策情境中引入一个令人愉悦的唤醒线索会使个体的偏好从更安全的经济选项转向风险更高的选项。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f4e/5732211/1c8a2335eef3/fpsyg-08-02142-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f4e/5732211/342a10648f9f/fpsyg-08-02142-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f4e/5732211/1c8a2335eef3/fpsyg-08-02142-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f4e/5732211/342a10648f9f/fpsyg-08-02142-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f4e/5732211/1c8a2335eef3/fpsyg-08-02142-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Positive Arousal Increases Individuals' Preferences for Risk.积极唤醒会增加个体对风险的偏好。
Front Psychol. 2017 Dec 11;8:2142. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02142. eCollection 2017.
2
Threat affects risk preferences in movement decision making.威胁会影响运动决策中的风险偏好。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2015 Jun 9;9:150. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00150. eCollection 2015.
3
Emotion and decision-making under uncertainty: Physiological arousal predicts increased gambling during ambiguity but not risk.不确定性下的情绪与决策:生理唤醒预示着在模糊情境而非风险情境下赌博行为的增加。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Oct;145(10):1255-1262. doi: 10.1037/xge0000205.
4
The interplay of experience-based affective and probabilistic cues in decision making: arousal increases when experience and additional cues conflict.决策中基于经验的情感线索与概率线索的相互作用:当经验与其他线索冲突时,唤醒水平会增加。
Exp Psychol. 2011;58(2):132-41. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000078.
5
Multiple timescales of temporal context in risky choice: Behavioral identification and relationships to physiological arousal.风险选择中的多个时间尺度的时间背景:行为识别及其与生理唤醒的关系。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 19;19(1):e0296681. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296681. eCollection 2024.
6
Hypoxia and risk preferences: Mild hypoxia impacts choices for low-probability high-payoff bets.缺氧与风险偏好:轻度缺氧影响对低概率高回报赌注的选择。
Front Physiol. 2022 Aug 29;13:960773. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.960773. eCollection 2022.
7
Social Comparisons are Associated with Poorer and Riskier Financial Decision Making, no Matter whether Encounters are Sporadic or Repeated.社会比较与较差和风险较高的财务决策相关,无论这种比较是偶尔发生还是反复出现。
Span J Psychol. 2016 Sep 20;19:E57. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2016.55.
8
Social interaction effects: The impact of distributional preferences on risky choices.社会互动效应:分配偏好对风险选择的影响。
J Risk Uncertain. 2018;56(2):141-164. doi: 10.1007/s11166-018-9275-5. Epub 2018 May 8.
9
The dissolution of temporal distance increases risk-taking: experimental evidence.时间距离的消解会增加冒险行为:实验证据。
Sci Rep. 2018 Nov 8;8(1):16565. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-34780-2.
10
Brain correlates of risky decision-making.大脑与冒险决策的关联。
Neuroimage. 2010 Jan 15;49(2):1886-94. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.08.068. Epub 2009 Sep 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Solving problems with an Aha! increases risk preference.通过顿悟来解决问题会增加风险偏好。
Think Reason. 2024;30(3):509-530. doi: 10.1080/13546783.2023.2259552. Epub 2023 Sep 19.
2
The impact of emotions on shopping behavior during epidemic. What a business can do to protect customers.疫情期间情绪对购物行为的影响。企业可为保护顾客做些什么。
J Consum Behav. 2021 Jan-Feb;20(1):48-60. doi: 10.1002/cb.1853. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
3
Aroused and Impulsive Effects of Colour Stimuli on Lateral and Logical Abilities.颜色刺激对横向和逻辑能力的激发及冲动效应。

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of stress on decisions under uncertainty: A meta-analysis.压力对不确定性下决策的影响:一项元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2016 Sep;142(9):909-933. doi: 10.1037/bul0000060.
2
The Impact of Sexual Arousal on Sexual Risk-Taking and Decision-Making in Men and Women.性唤起对男性和女性性冒险行为及决策的影响。
Arch Sex Behav. 2016 Jan;45(1):33-42. doi: 10.1007/s10508-015-0589-y. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
3
Acute Exercise Increases Sex Differences in Amateur Athletes' Risk Taking.急性运动增加了业余运动员冒险行为中的性别差异。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2021 Feb 7;11(2):24. doi: 10.3390/bs11020024.
Int J Sports Med. 2015 Oct;36(10):858-63. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1398677. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
4
Gender differences in sleep deprivation effects on risk and inequality aversion: evidence from an economic experiment.睡眠剥夺对风险和不平等厌恶影响的性别差异:来自一项经济实验的证据。
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 20;10(3):e0120029. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120029. eCollection 2015.
5
Social anxiety, acute social stress, and reward parameters interact to predict risky decision-making among adolescents.社交焦虑、急性社交压力和奖励参数相互作用,以预测青少年的冒险决策。
J Anxiety Disord. 2015 Jan;29:25-34. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2014.10.001. Epub 2014 Nov 3.
6
Acute stress affects risk taking but not ambiguity aversion.急性应激会影响冒险行为,但不会影响对模糊性的厌恶。
Front Neurosci. 2014 May 6;8:82. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2014.00082. eCollection 2014.
7
Sexual picture processing interferes with decision-making under ambiguity.色情图片处理会干扰在模糊情境下的决策。
Arch Sex Behav. 2014 Apr;43(3):473-82. doi: 10.1007/s10508-013-0119-8. Epub 2013 Jun 4.
8
I'm too calm--let's take a risk! On the impact of state and trait arousal on risk taking.我太冷静了——让我们冒险吧!论状态和特质唤醒对冒险行为的影响。
Psychophysiology. 2013 May;50(5):498-503. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12032. Epub 2013 Feb 19.
9
Individual differences in delay discounting under acute stress: the role of trait perceived stress.急性应激下延迟折扣的个体差异:特质性感知应激的作用。
Front Psychol. 2012 Jul 19;3:251. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00251. eCollection 2012.
10
Can Victoria's Secret change the future? A subjective time perception account of sexual-cue effects on impatience.维多利亚的秘密能改变未来吗?性线索对急躁的影响的主观时间感知解释。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 May;142(2):328-35. doi: 10.1037/a0028954. Epub 2012 Jun 11.