University of Washington Family Medicine Residency, 331 NE Thornton Place, Seattle, WA, 98125, USA.
Department of Family Medicine-Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Jan 10;18(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-1104-z.
The overarching purpose of this study is to examine the current trends in interprofessional education (IPE) within graduate medical education in the Unites States.
A survey was sent to program directors across with different specialties between March and April 2016. The survey was completed by 233 out of 1757 program directors, which represents a response rate of 13.3%.
IPE is currently being used by over 60% of the GME program directors that completed the survey. The median number of IPE hours is 60. Classroom learning (70.8%) and team-based approaches (70.1%) to patient care are the two most common forms of IPE. The two most prevalent reasons for implementing IPE are improving collaboration (92.2%) and communication (87%). More than half of the program directors agreed or strongly agreed that lack of time both for teachers (54.4) and for residents (51.5%) are barriers to IPE. About one third of the respondents whose programs do not include IPE are interested in implementing some IPE in the future.
IPE in its varying formats has been implemented as a training model by many residency programs. Further studies are needed to explore the comparative effectiveness of the different modalities of IPE.
本研究的总体目的是考察美国研究生医学教育中跨专业教育(IPE)的当前趋势。
2016 年 3 月至 4 月期间,向不同专业的项目主管发送了一份调查。233 名项目主管完成了调查,占完成调查的 1757 名项目主管的 13.3%。
超过 60%的完成调查的 GME 项目主管目前正在使用 IPE。IPE 的中位数时数为 60 小时。课堂学习(70.8%)和以团队为基础的患者护理方法(70.1%)是两种最常见的 IPE 形式。实施 IPE 的两个最常见原因是改善协作(92.2%)和沟通(87%)。超过一半的项目主管同意或强烈同意教师(54.4%)和住院医师(51.5%)缺乏时间是 IPE 的障碍。约三分之一的其项目不包括 IPE 的受访者有兴趣在未来实施一些 IPE。
许多住院医师培训计划以不同的形式实施了 IPE 作为培训模式。需要进一步研究以探讨不同 IPE 模式的相对效果。