a Department of Anthropology , University of Maryland , College Park , USA.
Glob Public Health. 2018 Aug;13(8):982-996. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2018.1423701. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
In biomedical, public health, and popular discourses, the 'end of AIDS' has emerged as a predominant way to understand the future of HIV research and prevention. This approach is predicated on structuring and responding to HIV in ways that underscore its presumed lifelong nature. In this article, I examine the phenomenon of HIV chronicity that undergirds the 'end of AIDS' discourse. In particular, I explore how the logic of HIV chronicity, induced by technological advances in treatment and global financial and political investments, intensifies long-term uncertainty and prolonged crisis. Focusing on over 10 years of anthropological and public health research in the United States, I argue that HIV chronicity, and subsequently, the 'end of AIDS' discourse, obscure the on-going HIV crisis in particular global communities, especially among marginalised and ageing populations who live in under-resourced areas. By tracing the 'end of AIDS' discourse in my field sites and in other global locations, I describe how HIV chronicity signals a continuing global crisis and persistent social precarity rather than a 'break' with a hopeless past or a promising future free from AIDS.
在生物医学、公共卫生和大众话语中,“艾滋病终结”已成为理解 HIV 研究和预防未来的主要方式。这种方法的前提是从结构和应对 HIV 的角度出发,强调其假定的终身性质。在本文中,我探讨了支撑“艾滋病终结”话语的 HIV 慢性现象。具体来说,我探讨了治疗技术的进步以及全球金融和政治投资所引发的 HIV 慢性逻辑如何加剧了长期的不确定性和持续的危机。我主要关注了美国长达 10 多年的人类学和公共卫生研究,认为 HIV 慢性以及随后的“艾滋病终结”话语掩盖了特定全球社区中持续存在的 HIV 危机,尤其是在资源匮乏地区处于边缘和老龄化的人群中。通过追踪我在实地和其他全球地点的“艾滋病终结”话语,我描述了 HIV 慢性如何标志着持续的全球危机和持续的社会脆弱性,而不是与无望的过去或没有艾滋病的充满希望的未来的“突破”。